Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)
If you are a commercial license holder, why not contact the support team? What's the point of paying commercial support? I always found their help very useful. Le lun. 6 sept. 2021 à 18:50, Alexander Dyagilev a écrit : > Hi guys :) > > Sorry, I didn't mean to offend anyone :) > > What I meant is that this bug *should* be easy fixable for the author of > that component. > > But I can understand that I can be wrong and it's not that easy... > > Anyway, thanks you all for your good work on Qt project :) > > > On 9/3/2021 3:06 PM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > > Hello :) > > > > I think this bug is easy to fix, but yet, it's still theme for almost > > of 5 years! > > > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58335 > > > > One just forgot to use encodeURIComponent/decodeURIComponent in proper > > places... > > > > I think this is a must to fix bug for upcoming Qt 6.2 :) > > > ___ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
Re: [Interest] Another Qt disappointment
Which bug are you talking about? This one: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-87288 Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 16:45, Jason H a écrit : > I have a load cell. It's a sensor that measures weight. I wanted to make a > quick UI for it in Qt. > That went as expected. Then I wanted to put the app on a spare Amazon Fire > tablet rather than tie up a computer with it. > > I was running with Qt 5.15.2, but there's. bug with Bearer in Qt 5.15.2, > so I went to update it, and lo and behold, there is no 5.15.3. It's > apparently, commercial-only. So I figured I'd finally update to Qt 6, > except that after installing, it turns out Qt 6.0 doesn't have > androidextras. > > It's not just me that is disappointed, everyone in the comments at > https://www.qt.io/blog/commercial-lts-qt-5.15.3-released seems > disappointed that 5.15.3 is commercial-only. > > So as I sit here waiting for Qt 6 and Qt 5.15 to uninstall, and Qt 5.12 to > install, I figured that I'd drop this note about how things are going the > wrong way. > > > > > > > ___ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
Re: [Interest] Customizing the output library name in Android builds
Hi, I just gave a try with Qbs and it's possible to keep the old (Qt < 5.14) naming (without the arch suffix). I just tried with the addressbook example and it works. Qbs just needs to trick androiddeployqt a bit. If that's a feature users can be interested in then it's possible to add it as an option. Raph ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
[Interest] Subject: Re: Customizing the output library name in Android builds
Hi, I just gave a try with Qbs and it's possible to keep the old (Qt < 5.14) naming (without the arch suffix). I just tried with the addressbook example and it works. Qbs just needs to trick androiddeployqt a bit. If that's a feature users can be interested in then it's possible to add it as an option. Raph ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
