[PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] PHP Namespace in core
śr., 3 cze 2020 o 09:49 Michał Brzuchalski napisał(a): > pt., 22 maj 2020 o 08:14 Michał Brzuchalski > napisał(a): > >> Hi Internals, >> >> We have just opened the vote on the PHP namespace in core RFC. The voting >> will be >> open for two weeks, until 2020-06-05 06:00 UTC. >> > > Heads-up. We will end the vote soon. > If anyone may have not decided yet or would like to change their mind, > this is the last moment. > You're the one who rocks here! > Voting is now closed. The proposed RFC was rejected with 19 votes in favour and 24 against. Thank you all for participating. Cheers, Michał Brzuchalski
[PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] PHP Namespace in core
pt., 22 maj 2020 o 08:14 Michał Brzuchalski napisał(a): > Hi Internals, > > We have just opened the vote on the PHP namespace in core RFC. The voting > will be > open for two weeks, until 2020-06-05 06:00 UTC. > Heads-up. We will end the vote soon. If anyone may have not decided yet or would like to change their mind, this is the last moment. You're the one who rocks here! Cheers, Michał Brzuchalski
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] PHP Namespace in core
On 22/05/2020 19:32, Rowan Tommins wrote: * They might even prefer your RFC, which is still marked "Under Discussion": https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php_namespace_policy Even though the two RFCs were seperate and created without each others knowledge, I don't know how people would feel about holding a similar one if this one was voted down. If this one passed it was my intention to immediately vote on my own, which would change the policy to require sub-namespaces and limit it to autoloadable components. Which wouldn't make sense if \PHP was still denied. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] PHP Namespace in core
On 22/05/2020 18:30, Mark Randall wrote: Should this vote fail, \PHP effectively changes from a reserved namespace, to a dead namespace. I don't see how you get from the text of this RFC to that conclusion. There are a number of reasons why people who vote against this RFC might vote for an alternative, such as: * They would prefer *more* classes to be in \PHP * They would prefer fewer classes, but not none * They would prefer a similar number of classes, but a different definition * They would prefer a guideline with "should" or "may" rather than "must" * They like the definition, but would prefer a plan to rename existing classes that meet it, for consistency (I don't have a vote, but I might well vote No on this basis) * They would prefer a concrete proposal on how to structure the namespace, which this RFC explicitly is not * They might even prefer your RFC, which is still marked "Under Discussion": https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php_namespace_policy It is possible that "officially declare that we won't use the \PHP namespace" would get a majority, but that's not what this vote asks. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins (né Collins) [IMSoP] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] PHP Namespace in core
On 22/05/2020 07:14, Michał Brzuchalski wrote: Hi Internals, We have just opened the vote on the PHP namespace in core RFC. The voting will be open for two weeks, until 2020-06-05 06:00 UTC. Link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php-namespace-in-core#vote Cheers, Michał Marcin Brzuchalski I hope that those voting look to the long term, the next 10 to 20 years, and the potentially hundreds of new classes that they may bring. I hope those voting don't choose to place a senseless blanket limitation on the options available to all future RFC authors, even before those authors have had an opportunity to make their case for their individual usage of \PHP. Should this vote fail, \PHP effectively changes from a reserved namespace, to a dead namespace. Mark Randall -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
