Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
All right ;-) Johannes: Thanks for details about lighhtpd's internals. Julien.P 2011/4/27 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Pauli wrote: I'm +1 with that list. I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just tell it... lighty's API for that is FastCGI. There is an native API, but plugging in PHP there would be bad in regards to lighty's event-based architecture. What about apache2filter SAPI ? What what? I didn't here from people who are using or maintaining it ... so it's on the i don't know list. johannes Julien.P 2011/4/24 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com: On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it in) but apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
I'm +1 with that list. I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just tell it... What about apache2filter SAPI ? Julien.P 2011/4/24 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com: On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it in) but apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Pauli wrote: I'm +1 with that list. I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just tell it... lighty's API for that is FastCGI. There is an native API, but plugging in PHP there would be bad in regards to lighty's event-based architecture. What about apache2filter SAPI ? What what? I didn't here from people who are using or maintaining it ... so it's on the i don't know list. johannes Julien.P 2011/4/24 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com: On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it in) but apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. 2011/4/23 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de: Hi, we have quite a few SAPIs where I expect that nobody looked at them for years. Anybody objects from dropping them from trunk? This brings less stuff to document and less confusion for users. I suggest dropping: aolserver caudium continuity milter phttpd pi3web roxen thttpd tux webjames I'm not sure about: apache_hooks apache2filter isapi (is FastCGI now preferred on Win?) That leaves: apache apache2handler cgi cli embed fpm litespeed nsapi johannes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com: On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it in) but apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
isapi (is FastCGI now preferred on Win?) Pls don't remove ISAPI, as it still workswindofor 5.3 even if deprecated. We still use it as part of third-party x64 Windows builds. -- Sandy -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
Hi, we have quite a few SAPIs where I expect that nobody looked at them for years. Anybody objects from dropping them from trunk? This brings less stuff to document and less confusion for users. I suggest dropping: aolserver caudium continuity milter phttpd pi3web roxen thttpd tux webjames I'm not sure about: apache_hooks apache2filter isapi (is FastCGI now preferred on Win?) That leaves: apache apache2handler cgi cli embed fpm litespeed nsapi johannes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
On 4/22/11 6:08 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote: apache_hooks We can drop apache_hooks as well. I think I was the only one ever to use it. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
