Hi Shameer,
On 12/3/20 7:42 PM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: kvmarm-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> [mailto:kvmarm-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Auger Eric
>> Sent: 01 December 2020 13:59
>> To: wangxingang
>> Cc: Xieyingtai ; jean-phili...@linaro.org;
>> k...@vger.kernel.org; m...@kernel.org; j...@8bytes.org; w...@kernel.org;
>> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
>> vivek.gau...@arm.com; alex.william...@redhat.com;
>> zhangfei@linaro.org; robin.mur...@arm.com;
>> kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger@gmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
>> unmanaged ASIDs
>>
>> Hi Xingang,
>>
>> On 12/1/20 2:33 PM, Xingang Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Eric
>>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:21:43, Eric Auger wrote:
@@ -1710,7 +1710,11 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void
>> *cookie)
* insertion to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be
* careful, 007.
*/
- if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
+ if (ext_asid >= 0) { /* guest stage 1 invalidation */
+ cmd.opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_ASID;
+ cmd.tlbi.asid = ext_asid;
+ cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid;
+ } else if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
>>>
>>> Found a problem here, the cmd for guest stage 1 invalidation is built,
>>> but it is not delivered to smmu.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for the report. I will fix that soon. With that fixed, have
>> you been able to run vSVA on top of the series. Do you need other stuff
>> to be fixed at SMMU level?
>
> I am seeing another issue with this series. This is when you have the vSMMU
> in non-strict mode(iommu.strict=0). Any network pass-through dev with iperf
> run
> will be enough to reproduce the issue. It may randomly stop/hang.
>
> It looks like the .flush_iotlb_all from guest is not propagated down to the
> host
> correctly. I have a temp hack to fix this in Qemu wherein CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_ASID
> will result in a CACHE_INVALIDATE with IOMMU_INV_GRANU_PASID flag and archid
> set.
Thank you for the analysis. Indeed the NH_ASID was not properly handled
as asid info was not passed down. I fixed domain invalidation and added
asid based invalidation.
Thanks
Eric
>
> Please take a look and let me know.
>
> As I am going to respin soon, please let me
>> know what is the best branch to rebase to alleviate your integration.
>
> Please find the latest kernel and Qemu branch with vSVA support added here,
>
> https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/tree/5.10-rc4-2stage-v13-vsva
> https://github.com/hisilicon/qemu/tree/v5.2.0-rc1-2stage-rfcv7-vsva
>
> I have done some basic minimum vSVA tests on a HiSilicon D06 board with
> a zip dev that supports STALL. All looks good so far apart from the issues
> that have been already reported/discussed.
>
> The kernel branch is actually a rebase of sva/uacce related patches from a
> Linaro branch here,
>
> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/tree/uacce-devel-5.10
>
> I think going forward it will be good(if possible) to respin your series on
> top of
> a sva branch with STALL/PRI support added.
>
> Hi Jean/zhangfei,
> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
> patches
> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of
> Eric's series?
> Please share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> ___
>> kvmarm mailing list
>> kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
>
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
