Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:18:57 +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness > annotations: > > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64 > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype] > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] > src > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long * > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] > src > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |= > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64 > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base > types) > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] > strtab > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr > > [...] Applied to will (for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates), thanks! [1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations https://git.kernel.org/will/c/376cdf66f624 Cheers, -- Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:02:26PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2020-09-18 15:18, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness > > annotations: > > > > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64 > > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base > > types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] > > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype] > > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base > > types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] > > dst > > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent > > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base > > types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] > > src > > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * > > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base > > types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] > > dst > > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long * > > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base > > types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] > > src > > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |= > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64 > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different > > base types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different > > base types) > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] > > *[assigned] strtab > > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr > > > > While harmless, they are incorrect and could hide actual errors during > > development. Fix them. > > Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker > > --- > > > > There is another false positive due to passing INT_MIN to cmpxchg, and > > __cmpxchg* to truncate them to u8 and u16: > > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from > > constant value (8000 becomes 0) > > arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from > > constant value (8000 becomes 0) > > > > I haven't found a satisfying fix so far, except adding __force to > > __cmpxchg_case* which could hide actual bugs. > > I guess that's a general issue with the switch(sizeof()) idiom of sparse not > being aware that those cases are unreachable? Precisely. I wondered if _Generic could help, but it looks like the problem is the same. Thanks, Jean ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations
On 2020-09-18 15:18, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness annotations: arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64 arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype] arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long * arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |= arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64 arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] strtab arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr While harmless, they are incorrect and could hide actual errors during development. Fix them. Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker --- There is another false positive due to passing INT_MIN to cmpxchg, and __cmpxchg* to truncate them to u8 and u16: arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000 becomes 0) arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000 becomes 0) I haven't found a satisfying fix so far, except adding __force to __cmpxchg_case* which could hide actual bugs. I guess that's a general issue with the switch(sizeof()) idiom of sparse not being aware that those cases are unreachable? Robin. --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index c192544e874b..83acc1e5888e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void queue_write(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords) *dst++ = cpu_to_le64(*src++); } -static void queue_read(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords) +static void queue_read(u64 *dst, __le64 *src, size_t n_dwords) { int i; @@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid, arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, _cmd); } -static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(u64 *strtab, unsigned int nent) +static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent) { unsigned int i; ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations
When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness annotations: arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64 arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype] arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long * arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] * arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |= arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64 arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] strtab arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr While harmless, they are incorrect and could hide actual errors during development. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker --- There is another false positive due to passing INT_MIN to cmpxchg, and __cmpxchg* to truncate them to u8 and u16: arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000 becomes 0) arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000 becomes 0) I haven't found a satisfying fix so far, except adding __force to __cmpxchg_case* which could hide actual bugs. --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index c192544e874b..83acc1e5888e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void queue_write(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords) *dst++ = cpu_to_le64(*src++); } -static void queue_read(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords) +static void queue_read(u64 *dst, __le64 *src, size_t n_dwords) { int i; @@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid, arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, _cmd); } -static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(u64 *strtab, unsigned int nent) +static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent) { unsigned int i; -- 2.28.0 ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu