Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations

2020-09-21 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:18:57 +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness
> annotations:
> 
> arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64
> arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype]
> arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype]
> arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst
> arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent
> arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
> src
> arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
> arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst
> arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long *
> arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
> src
> arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |=
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
> types)
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
> strtab
> arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr
> 
> [...]

Applied to will (for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates), thanks!

[1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations
  https://git.kernel.org/will/c/376cdf66f624

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations

2020-09-18 Thread Jean-Philippe Brucker
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:02:26PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-09-18 15:18, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness
> > annotations:
> > 
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base 
> > types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype]
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype]
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
> > types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] 
> > dst
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
> > types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
> > src
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
> > types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] 
> > dst
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long *
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
> > types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
> > src
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |=
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different 
> > base types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different 
> > base types)
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] 
> > *[assigned] strtab
> > arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr
> > 
> > While harmless, they are incorrect and could hide actual errors during
> > development. Fix them.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy 

Thanks!

> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker 
> > ---
> > 
> > There is another false positive due to passing INT_MIN to cmpxchg, and
> > __cmpxchg* to truncate them to u8 and u16:
> > 
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from 
> > constant value (8000 becomes 0)
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from 
> > constant value (8000 becomes 0)
> > 
> > I haven't found a satisfying fix so far, except adding __force to
> > __cmpxchg_case* which could hide actual bugs.
> 
> I guess that's a general issue with the switch(sizeof()) idiom of sparse not
> being aware that those cases are unreachable?

Precisely. I wondered if _Generic could help, but it looks like the
problem is the same.

Thanks,
Jean

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations

2020-09-18 Thread Robin Murphy

On 2020-09-18 15:18, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:

When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness
annotations:

arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64
arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype]
arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype]
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long *
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |=
arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64
arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long
arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst
arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab
arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
strtab
arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr

While harmless, they are incorrect and could hide actual errors during
development. Fix them.


Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy 


Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker 
---

There is another false positive due to passing INT_MIN to cmpxchg, and
__cmpxchg* to truncate them to u8 and u16:

arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from 
constant value (8000 becomes 0)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from 
constant value (8000 becomes 0)

I haven't found a satisfying fix so far, except adding __force to
__cmpxchg_case* which could hide actual bugs.


I guess that's a general issue with the switch(sizeof()) idiom of sparse 
not being aware that those cases are unreachable?


Robin.


---
  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c 
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index c192544e874b..83acc1e5888e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void queue_write(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t 
n_dwords)
*dst++ = cpu_to_le64(*src++);
  }
  
-static void queue_read(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords)

+static void queue_read(u64 *dst, __le64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
  {
int i;
  
@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,

arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, _cmd);
  }
  
-static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(u64 *strtab, unsigned int nent)

+static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent)
  {
unsigned int i;
  


___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix endianness annotations

2020-09-18 Thread Jean-Philippe Brucker
When building with C=1, sparse reports some issues regarding endianness
annotations:

arm-smmu-v3.c:221:26: warning: cast to restricted __le64
arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:expected restricted __le64 [usertype]
arm-smmu-v3.c:221:24:got unsigned long long [usertype]
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:20:got unsigned long long [usertype] *ent
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src
arm-smmu-v3.c:229:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *[assigned] dst
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:20:got unsigned long long *
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] src
arm-smmu-v3.c:396:25:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *
arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32: warning: invalid assignment: |=
arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:left side has type restricted __le64
arm-smmu-v3.c:1349:32:right side has type unsigned long
arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:expected restricted __le64 [usertype] *dst
arm-smmu-v3.c:1396:53:got unsigned long long [usertype] *strtab
arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base 
types)
arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:expected unsigned long long [usertype] *[assigned] 
strtab
arm-smmu-v3.c:1424:39:got restricted __le64 [usertype] *l2ptr

While harmless, they are incorrect and could hide actual errors during
development. Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker 
---

There is another false positive due to passing INT_MIN to cmpxchg, and
__cmpxchg* to truncate them to u8 and u16:

arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from 
constant value (8000 becomes 0)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:172:1: warning: cast truncates bits from 
constant value (8000 becomes 0)

I haven't found a satisfying fix so far, except adding __force to
__cmpxchg_case* which could hide actual bugs.
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c 
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index c192544e874b..83acc1e5888e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void queue_write(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t 
n_dwords)
*dst++ = cpu_to_le64(*src++);
 }
 
-static void queue_read(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
+static void queue_read(u64 *dst, __le64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
 {
int i;
 
@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct 
arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, _cmd);
 }
 
-static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(u64 *strtab, unsigned int nent)
+static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(__le64 *strtab, unsigned int nent)
 {
unsigned int i;
 
-- 
2.28.0

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu