Re: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/tegra: Add IOMMU group support

2017-12-12 Thread Alex Williamson 
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:53:43 +0100
Thierry Reding  wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:50:53AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding 
> > 
> > Hi Joerg,
> > 
> > Both patches in this series are built-time dependent and therefore it
> > would be easiest if they went in via the same tree (either the IOMMU
> > tree, or the Tegra tree with your Acked-by on patch 1). Alternatively,
> > I could put patch two in a separate branch and provide a stable tag for
> > you to pull in, in order to resolve the dependency.
> > 
> > Do you have any preference?
> > 
> > Thierry
> > 
> > Thierry Reding (2):
> >   iommu/tegra: Allow devices to be grouped
> >   memory: tegra: Create SMMU display groups  
> 
> I just realized that these are actually in the wrong order. The second
> patch adds the data fields that the first patch uses. Depending on which
> merge strategy you prefer I can reorder when applying or resend in the
> correct order.


Hi Thierry,

Joerg is on paternity leave through the end of the year and I'm
handling the IOMMU tree in the interim.  Given the low traffic on
iommu/tegra-smmu.c, I'm going to suggest we take the merge path through
the Tegra tree and I'll Ack the first patch to help that along.  Please
do the necessary re-order when applying.  Thanks,

Alex

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/tegra: Add IOMMU group support

2017-11-27 Thread Thierry Reding 
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:50:53AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding 
> 
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> Both patches in this series are built-time dependent and therefore it
> would be easiest if they went in via the same tree (either the IOMMU
> tree, or the Tegra tree with your Acked-by on patch 1). Alternatively,
> I could put patch two in a separate branch and provide a stable tag for
> you to pull in, in order to resolve the dependency.
> 
> Do you have any preference?
> 
> Thierry
> 
> Thierry Reding (2):
>   iommu/tegra: Allow devices to be grouped
>   memory: tegra: Create SMMU display groups

I just realized that these are actually in the wrong order. The second
patch adds the data fields that the first patch uses. Depending on which
merge strategy you prefer I can reorder when applying or resend in the
correct order.

Thierry


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

[PATCH 0/2] iommu/tegra: Add IOMMU group support

2017-11-27 Thread Thierry Reding 
From: Thierry Reding 

Hi Joerg,

Both patches in this series are built-time dependent and therefore it
would be easiest if they went in via the same tree (either the IOMMU
tree, or the Tegra tree with your Acked-by on patch 1). Alternatively,
I could put patch two in a separate branch and provide a stable tag for
you to pull in, in order to resolve the dependency.

Do you have any preference?

Thierry

Thierry Reding (2):
  iommu/tegra: Allow devices to be grouped
  memory: tegra: Create SMMU display groups

 drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c  | 124 ++--
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra114.c |  15 +
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c |  17 ++
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210.c |  15 +
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra30.c  |  15 +
 include/soc/tegra/mc.h  |   9 +++
 6 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.15.0

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu