Re: [PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:10 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang wangyij...@huawei.com This looks fine and seems to boot OK. Acked-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au (powerpc) cheers ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
[PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq
Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang wangyij...@huawei.com --- arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c | 14 -- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c index 71bd161..01781a4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ #include asm/machdep.h -int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) +static int ppc_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) { if (!ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs || !ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs) { pr_debug(msi: Platform doesn't provide MSI callbacks.\n); @@ -27,7 +27,17 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) return ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, type); } -void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev) +static void ppc_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev) { ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs(dev); } + +static struct msi_chip ppc_msi_chip = { + .setup_irqs = ppc_setup_msi_irqs, + .teardown_irqs = ppc_teardown_msi_irqs, +}; + +struct msi_chip *arch_find_msi_chip(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + return ppc_msi_chip; +} -- 1.7.1 ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq
Hello. On 9/5/2014 2:10 PM, Yijing Wang wrote: Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang wangyij...@huawei.com --- arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c | 14 -- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c index 71bd161..01781a4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c [...] @@ -27,7 +27,17 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) return ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, type); } -void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev) +static void ppc_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev) Shouldn't this function take IRQ # instead? { ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs(dev); } + +static struct msi_chip ppc_msi_chip = { + .setup_irqs = ppc_setup_msi_irqs, + .teardown_irqs = ppc_teardown_msi_irqs, +}; + +struct msi_chip *arch_find_msi_chip(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + return ppc_msi_chip; +} WBR, Sergei ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu