Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] SMMU 52-bit address support
Hi Robin, On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:58:49PM +, Robin Murphy wrote: > Here's a (hopefully final) update of 52-bit SMMU support. The only > material changes from v1[1] are a small cosmetic tweak to patch #1, > and correction of the silly error in patch #2 as reported by Nate in > testing. This generally looks pretty good, but I have some review comments that I think we should address before merging. Cheers, Will ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
[PATCH v2 0/4] SMMU 52-bit address support
Hi all, Here's a (hopefully final) update of 52-bit SMMU support. The only material changes from v1[1] are a small cosmetic tweak to patch #1, and correction of the silly error in patch #2 as reported by Nate in testing. Robin. [1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2017-November/025073.html Robin Murphy (4): iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Clean up address masking iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Support 52-bit physical address iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support 52-bit physical address iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support 52-bit virtual address drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c| 76 ++ drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 65 ++-- 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) -- 2.13.4.dirty ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
