Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function

2021-08-17 Thread Tom Lendacky via iommu 
On 8/17/21 5:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> This one wants to be part of the previous patch.
> 
> ... and the three following patches too - the treewide patch does a
> single atomic :) replacement and that's it.

Ok, I'll squash those all together.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function

2021-08-17 Thread Borislav Petkov 
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> This one wants to be part of the previous patch.

... and the three following patches too - the treewide patch does a
single atomic :) replacement and that's it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function

2021-08-17 Thread Borislav Petkov 
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:28AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
> so remove the implementation.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky 
> ---
>  include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 4 
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
>  
>  #include 
>  
> -#else/* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
> -
> -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
> -
>  #endif   /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> -- 

This one wants to be part of the previous patch.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

[PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function

2021-08-13 Thread Tom Lendacky via iommu 
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.

Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel 
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky 
---
 include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644
--- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
 
 #include 
 
-#else  /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
-
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
-
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
-- 
2.32.0

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu