Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] iommu: mtk_iommu: Introduce new flag TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173

2022-06-12 Thread Yong Wu via iommu
On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 12:40 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> In preparation for adding support for MT6795, add a new flag named
> TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173 and use that instead of checking for m4u_plat
> type in mtk_iommu_hw_init() to avoid seeing a long list of m4u_plat
> checks there in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delre...@collabora.com>

Retitle to: iommu/mediatek: Xxx, then

Reviewed-by: Yong Wu 

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 6 --
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 0ea0848581e9..8611cf8e4bd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
>  #define IFA_IOMMU_PCIE_SUPPORT   BIT(16)
>  /* IOMMU I/O (r/w) is enabled using PERICFG_IOMMU_1 register */
>  #define HAS_PERI_IOMMU1_REG  BIT(17)
> +#define TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173   BIT(18)
>  
>  #define MTK_IOMMU_HAS_FLAG_MASK(pdata, _x, mask) \
>   pdata)->flags) & (mask)) == (_x))
> @@ -960,7 +961,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct
> mtk_iommu_data *data, unsigned int ban
>* Global control settings are in bank0. May re-init these
> global registers
>* since no sure if there is bank0 consumers.
>*/
> - if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173) {
> + if (MTK_IOMMU_HAS_FLAG(data->plat_data,
> TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173)) {
>   regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
>F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR_MT8173;
>   } else {
> @@ -1437,7 +1438,8 @@ static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data
> mt8167_data = {
>  static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8173_data = {
>   .m4u_plat = M4U_MT8173,
>   .flags= HAS_4GB_MODE | HAS_BCLK | RESET_AXI |
> - HAS_LEGACY_IVRP_PADDR | MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM,
> + HAS_LEGACY_IVRP_PADDR | MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM |
> + TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173,
>   .inv_sel_reg  = REG_MMU_INV_SEL_GEN1,
>   .banks_num= 1,
>   .banks_enable = {true},

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


[PATCH v3 2/3] iommu: mtk_iommu: Introduce new flag TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173

2022-06-09 Thread AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
In preparation for adding support for MT6795, add a new flag named
TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173 and use that instead of checking for m4u_plat
type in mtk_iommu_hw_init() to avoid seeing a long list of m4u_plat
checks there in the future.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 

---
 drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 6 --
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index 0ea0848581e9..8611cf8e4bd5 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
 #define IFA_IOMMU_PCIE_SUPPORT BIT(16)
 /* IOMMU I/O (r/w) is enabled using PERICFG_IOMMU_1 register */
 #define HAS_PERI_IOMMU1_REGBIT(17)
+#define TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173 BIT(18)
 
 #define MTK_IOMMU_HAS_FLAG_MASK(pdata, _x, mask)   \
pdata)->flags) & (mask)) == (_x))
@@ -960,7 +961,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data 
*data, unsigned int ban
 * Global control settings are in bank0. May re-init these global 
registers
 * since no sure if there is bank0 consumers.
 */
-   if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173) {
+   if (MTK_IOMMU_HAS_FLAG(data->plat_data, TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173)) {
regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
 F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR_MT8173;
} else {
@@ -1437,7 +1438,8 @@ static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8167_data = {
 static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8173_data = {
.m4u_plat = M4U_MT8173,
.flags= HAS_4GB_MODE | HAS_BCLK | RESET_AXI |
-   HAS_LEGACY_IVRP_PADDR | MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM,
+   HAS_LEGACY_IVRP_PADDR | MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM |
+   TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173,
.inv_sel_reg  = REG_MMU_INV_SEL_GEN1,
.banks_num= 1,
.banks_enable = {true},
-- 
2.35.1

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu