Re: [PATCH] x86/iommu: Fix two minimal issues in check_iommu_entries()
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:04 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > > check_iommu_entries() checks for cyclic dependency in iommu entries > > and fixes the cyclic dependency by setting x->depend to NULL. But > > this repairing isn't correct if q is in front of p, there will be > > "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID!" report following. Fix it by NULLing > > whichever in the front. > > > > The second issue is about the report of exectuion order reverse, > > the order is reversed incorrectly in the report, fix it. > > Heya! > > When you debugged this, did you by any chance save the > serial logs and the debug logs to double-check it? Hi Konrad, The iommu_table_entry is sorted by sort_iommu_table() and check_iommu_entries() finds nothing abnormal, so there is no related logs to check. Sorry for my poor english, I'm not saying there is order reverse, even if there is, it will be repaired by sort_iommu_table(). Then check_iommu_entries() report nothing. What I mean is about check_iommu_entries() itself, below printk isn't correct. printk(KERN_ERR "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID! %pS should be called before %pS!\n", p->detect, q->detect); Should be: printk(KERN_ERR "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID! %pS should be called before %pS!\n", q->detect, p->detect); Regards Zhenzhong ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH] x86/iommu: Fix two minimal issues in check_iommu_entries()
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> check_iommu_entries() checks for cyclic dependency in iommu entries
> and fixes the cyclic dependency by setting x->depend to NULL. But
> this repairing isn't correct if q is in front of p, there will be
> "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID!" report following. Fix it by NULLing
> whichever in the front.
>
> The second issue is about the report of exectuion order reverse,
> the order is reversed incorrectly in the report, fix it.
Heya!
When you debugged this, did you by any chance save the
serial logs and the debug logs to double-check it?
Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c | 7 +--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> index 2e9006c..40c8249 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,10 @@ void __init check_iommu_entries(struct iommu_table_entry
> *start,
> printk(KERN_ERR "CYCLIC DEPENDENCY FOUND! %pS depends
> on %pS and vice-versa. BREAKING IT.\n",
> p->detect, q->detect);
> /* Heavy handed way..*/
> - x->depend = NULL;
> + if (p > q)
> + q->depend = NULL;
> + else
> + p->depend = NULL;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -68,7 +71,7 @@ void __init check_iommu_entries(struct iommu_table_entry
> *start,
> q = find_dependents_of(p, finish, p);
> if (q && q > p) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID! %pS should be
> called before %pS!\n",
> -p->detect, q->detect);
> +q->detect, p->detect);
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH] x86/iommu: Fix two minimal issues in check_iommu_entries()
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:02 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > > check_iommu_entries() checks for cyclic dependency in iommu entries > > and fixes the cyclic dependency by setting x->depend to NULL. But > > this repairing isn't correct if q is in front of p, there will be > > "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID!" report following. Fix it by NULLing > > whichever in the front. > > When does "q is in front of p" happen? How does it happen? Sorry, just realized it never happen. > > > The second issue is about the report of exectuion order reverse, > > the order is reversed incorrectly in the report, fix it. > > I have no clue what that means. I mean if p depends on q, then q->detect should be called before p->detect. The message generated by printk() is wrong. Regards Zhenzhong ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH] x86/iommu: Fix two minimal issues in check_iommu_entries()
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > check_iommu_entries() checks for cyclic dependency in iommu entries > and fixes the cyclic dependency by setting x->depend to NULL. But > this repairing isn't correct if q is in front of p, there will be > "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID!" report following. Fix it by NULLing > whichever in the front. When does "q is in front of p" happen? How does it happen? > The second issue is about the report of exectuion order reverse, > the order is reversed incorrectly in the report, fix it. I have no clue what that means. Plese structure your commit message something like this: Problem is A. It happens because of B. Fix it by doing C. (Potentially do D). For more detailed info, see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, Section "2) Describe your changes". Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
