Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
>
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
> sme_me_mask to EXPORT_SYBMOL:
> commit 87df26175e67 ("x86/mm: Unbreak modules that rely on external
> PAGE_KERNEL availability")
> commit 9d5f38ba6c82 ("x86/mm: Unbreak modules that use the DMA API")
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> Cc: Dave Hansen
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra
> Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen
> Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky
Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
On 7/28/21 8:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote: >> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be >> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like >> sev_active(), etc. >> >> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will >> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active(). >> >> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the >> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and > > None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into > random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through > sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can > tell. Ok, let me make sure of that and I'll change to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL if that's the case. Thanks, Tom > ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote: > Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be > used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like > sev_active(), etc. > > While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will > also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active(). > > The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the > same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can tell. ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
