Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker writes: > The document shepherd writeup says: > > -- > 15. Should any informative references be normative or vice-versa? > > Yes. > -- > > I'm assuming the shepherd just ran over the question too quickly. > But, if you really meant "Yes" here, what's the plan to fix it?
No, the document did have incorrect split when I reviewed the document during the shepherd writeup, as can be seen from my email to authors: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/eua5PlKQtlWA6Ni7PJRHukPbmsg/ but I still sent the document forward as this is something that can be fixed later, and did not want to delay publication while waiting the authors to fix these kind of issues. The authors published -06 version immediately after that which fixed the normative and informative references split: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-05&url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-06&difftype=--html -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
