Re: push apps failing in Android until you disable IPv6
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Jeroen Massar wrote: From: Jeroen Massar <jer...@massar.ch> On 2016-05-09 19:28, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no <mailto:t...@fud.no>> wrote: Even a ULA PIO could be problematic if Android's source address selection algorithm isn't updated to RFC6724 defaults. RFC3484 predates ULAs, so it treats them the same as other globally scoped addresses. Android's source address selection was updated to RFC 6724 in early 2013 [commit <https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/378b0e1ea298ab4b8653e4b95e24d0cc0029414c>]. I think that went into 4.3. And how many devices will thus actually receive such an update? 3%? Oh, not too much off: http://www.statista.com/statistics/271774/share-of-android-platforms-on-mobile-devices-with-android-os/ 3% would only make sense if updates were not also incorporated into later releases. Those graphs suggest the uptake is significantly higher than just 3%. On the other hand, the pre-4.3 releases still account for a not-insignificant share. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
Re: So, time for some real action?
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 15:48 +, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 06/02/2014 14:51, Dick Visser wrote: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/ This is a terrible idea which will cause IPv6 to be associated with gratuitous breakage. Concur. This might make sense if IPv6-enabled networks were the norm and not the exception. But that's not true today nor will it likely be on June 6 this year. -- Antonio Querubin t...@lavanauts.org
MS HyperV virtual switch blocking IPv6 RAs?
Anybody know how to enable RA propagation through a HyperV virtual switch? I am running into some difficulty getting a Microsoft HyperV virtual switch to pass RAs to the attached VMs. However, the host (Windows 2012 Server) is receiving the RAs and is able to do SLAAC. I've looked at the various virtual switch config knobs but don't see anything that should be preventing the RAs from passing through the host and virtual switch to the VMs (the VMs are in the same VLAN as the router sending the RAs). There is an RA guard feature that can be enabled per virtual switch port but I have it disabled. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
