[isabelle-dev] NEWS: SQL database access in Isabelle/Scala
*** System *** * Isabelle/Scala: the SQL module supports access to relational databases, either as plain file (SQLite) or full-scale server (PostgreSQL via local port or remote ssh connection). * Results of "isabelle build" are recorded as SQLite database (i.e. "Application File Format" in the sense of https://www.sqlite.org/appfileformat.html). This allows systematic access via operations from module Sessions.Store in Isabelle/Scala. This refers to Isabelle/82add6bf8a42. There are also some administrative notes of PostgreSQL in Admin/build_log/README. SQL database access opens many possibilities for the near future. E.g. PIDE markup that is stored persistently; it would allow to browse formal sources of Isabelle + AFP in the Prover IDE (or some other client) without reprocessing. The implementation in src/Pure/General/sql.scala is relatively unexciting: it shows that simple things can be done in a simple way, without too much boilerplate of JDBC. Moreover, I did not pull in any of the more ambitious Scala/JDBC projects that are emerging elsewhere. Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
Re: [isabelle-dev] Poly/ML 5.7
On 15/05/17 14:24, Makarius wrote: > On 15/05/17 12:29, Lawrence Paulson wrote: >> Version 5.7 doesn’t even build on my main workstation, though it works >> on my MacBook Pro running broadly similar software. No idea what is >> going on here, but I’m not happy about it. > > There are already some mail threads on the Poly/ML list, where various > people have helped out to consolidate the situation. > > Anyone who is proficient with C/C++ and various platforms (Linux, > Windows, Mac OS X varieties) is invited to join there -- not just now, > but also in the longer term. Some of this activity is actually on the HOL and ProofPower mailing list, apart from the Isabelle side here. We should make sure that everything relevant to Poly/ML also goes over its official mailing list: http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/polyml Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
Re: [isabelle-dev] Poly/ML 5.7
On 15/05/17 12:14, Makarius wrote: > Some results can be seen here: > > http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/Poly_ML_5.7_Linux/index.html > http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/Poly_ML_5.7_Linux_2_threads/index.html > > The test hardware is similar or actually the same as "Linux A", but this > needs to be investigated further. It is also important to compare > timings for the *same* Isabelle versions, but the Poly_ML_5.7_Linux task > is still busy digging into older history. I have now changed that here: changeset: 65840:8d7b2ac9a245 tag: tip user:wenzelm date:Mon May 15 14:27:14 2017 +0200 files: src/Pure/Admin/isabelle_cronjob.scala description: history parameters like "Linux A", for more comparable results; Maybe I also manage to get ml_statistics into the charts soon. Then we can look at heap, task, thread details etc. Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
Re: [isabelle-dev] Poly/ML 5.7
On 15/05/17 12:29, Lawrence Paulson wrote: > Version 5.7 doesn’t even build on my main workstation, though it works > on my MacBook Pro running broadly similar software. No idea what is > going on here, but I’m not happy about it. There are already some mail threads on the Poly/ML list, where various people have helped out to consolidate the situation. Anyone who is proficient with C/C++ and various platforms (Linux, Windows, Mac OS X varieties) is invited to join there -- not just now, but also in the longer term. Note that for Isabelle, the build process works via "isabelle build_polyml" from recent repository versions, see also http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/annotate/8007f10195af/src/Pure/Admin/build_polyml.scala Going through Isabelle/Scala has the slight disadvantage of obscuring the description of the build process, but it is more robust and repeatable on all these platform variations. Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
Re: [isabelle-dev] Uses of Jenkins at TUM
On 25/04/17 09:41, Mathias Fleury wrote: > >> What is good about it? > (I don't remember enough of the previous system to compare it to Jenkins.) Lets go back to some points on this thread, now that I have finished more implementation work. > * automatic testing (I have forgotten to add files a couple of times). Forgetting to add files in a commit was one of the few cases where the remote test actually had a benefit. The start of this thread was such an incident, see Isabelle/006a274cdbc2. Thinking once more about the problem, it is clear that the standard "isabelle build" tool can do that check on the spot. See now: changeset: 65829:2fb85623c386 user:wenzelm date:Sun May 14 20:16:13 2017 +0200 files: src/Pure/General/mercurial.scala src/Pure/Tools/build.scala description: implicitly check for unknown files (not part of a Mercurial repository); src/Pure/General/mercurial.scala | 31 +++ src/Pure/Tools/build.scala | 15 +++ 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > * timings > > (https://ci.isabelle.systems/statistics/isabelle-nightly-benchmark/index.html). > It is useful to see how it evolves over time. I actually made this myself in reminiscence of the old isatest statistics, see also various mails in the vicinity of https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/pipermail/isabelle-dev/2016-August/007070.html In that discussion it also became clear that Jenkins lacks scalable test data management: queries via its API are very slow. This ultimately motivated the PostgreSQL database server that is now behind http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/index.html (PostgreSQL is a great product that does its job very well without much ado.) To reintegrate the old data source, I have added a function to download Jenkins logs into the same log directory as the other build_status information, see: http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/2773b6859c55 http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/jenkins_isabelle-nightly-benchmark_64bit_6_threads/index.html http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/jenkins_isabelle-nightly-slow_64bit_8_threads/index.html This replaces the former chart plotting directly from Jenkins, so Lars can now dismantle https://ci.isabelle.systems/statistics (which still says "Generated at Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:02:04 GMT"). Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
Re: [isabelle-dev] Poly/ML 5.7
Version 5.7 doesn’t even build on my main workstation, though it works on my MacBook Pro running broadly similar software. No idea what is going on here, but I’m not happy about it. Larry > On 15 May 2017, at 11:14, Makariuswrote: > > David Matthews has made the Poly/ML 5.7 release snapshot some weeks ago > (see https://github.com/polyml/polyml/releases/tag/v5.7), but announced > it only last week. > > I have wrapped that up as a component in Isabelle/d3c5898f1a5e, but that > is only for testing, not for production use. Some results can be seen here: > > http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/Poly_ML_5.7_Linux/index.html > http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/Poly_ML_5.7_Linux_2_threads/index.html > > The test hardware is similar or actually the same as "Linux A", but this > needs to be investigated further. It is also important to compare > timings for the *same* Isabelle versions, but the Poly_ML_5.7_Linux task > is still busy digging into older history. > > > After the substantial changes of the code generator and representation > of ML values in memory, there are various open questions concerning > performance and robustness of Isabelle applications. > > This means, we need to skip the Poly/ML 5.7 release and stay on the last > Poly/ML 5.6 until the situation becomes more clear. > > > This is how to use the polyml-5.7 component locally: > > $ edit $ISABELLE_HOME_USER/etc/settings > > init_component "$HOME/.isabelle/contrib/polyml-5.7" > > $ isabelle components -a > > > Makarius > ___ > isabelle-dev mailing list > isabelle-...@in.tum.de > https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
[isabelle-dev] Poly/ML 5.7
David Matthews has made the Poly/ML 5.7 release snapshot some weeks ago (see https://github.com/polyml/polyml/releases/tag/v5.7), but announced it only last week. I have wrapped that up as a component in Isabelle/d3c5898f1a5e, but that is only for testing, not for production use. Some results can be seen here: http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/Poly_ML_5.7_Linux/index.html http://isabelle.in.tum.de/devel/build_status/Poly_ML_5.7_Linux_2_threads/index.html The test hardware is similar or actually the same as "Linux A", but this needs to be investigated further. It is also important to compare timings for the *same* Isabelle versions, but the Poly_ML_5.7_Linux task is still busy digging into older history. After the substantial changes of the code generator and representation of ML values in memory, there are various open questions concerning performance and robustness of Isabelle applications. This means, we need to skip the Poly/ML 5.7 release and stay on the last Poly/ML 5.6 until the situation becomes more clear. This is how to use the polyml-5.7 component locally: $ edit $ISABELLE_HOME_USER/etc/settings init_component "$HOME/.isabelle/contrib/polyml-5.7" $ isabelle components -a Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev