Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Prophet (saws) Indistinguishable From His Companions

2007-07-16 Thread Alan Border
"Those who follow the messenger, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find 
mentioned in their own (scriptures),- in the law and the Gospel;- for he 
commands them what is just and forbids them what is evil; he allows them as 
lawful what is good (and pure) and prohibits them from what is bad (and 
impure); He releases them from their heavy burdens and from the yokes that are 
upon them. So it is those who believe in him, honour him, help him, and follow 
the light which is sent down with him,- it is they who will prosper."
  (Al-Qur'an, 7:157 Al-Araf [The Heights]))
  Indistinguishable From His Companions
  
Edited by Adil Salahi
  
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=5§ion=0&article=70923&d=30&m=9&y=2005&pix=islam.jpg&category=Islam
   
  The honor God granted to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is incomparable 
with anything people achieve in life. What position could be higher or more 
honorable than being chosen as God’s messenger who is entrusted with delivering 
His final message to mankind? It is a position in which the Messenger received 
direct revelations from God to provide guidance to all humanity, including all 
its future generations, on all aspects of life. Hence, whenever the Prophet is 
mentioned, his mention is coupled with expressions of love and high esteem. 
   
  This is a manifestation of what God has told him in the Qur’an: “Have We not 
given you high renown?” (94: 4) 
   
  Perhaps no community could have appreciated the role of the Prophet better 
than his own companions. They experienced what life was like without God’s 
guidance, then experienced life when molded in accordance with such guidance, 
and were fully aware of the difference it made. Hence, they loved the Prophet 
more than they loved their parents, children or even themselves. 
   
  When one of them, Khubayb ibn Adiy, who was taken captive and sold to the 
Quraysh, was brought forward to be killed, Abu Sufyan, the Quraysh chief, asked 
him: “Would you rather swap places with Muhammad, with him being here with us 
to kill and you are in your home with your family, safe and sound?” 
   
  Khubayb said: “I would not be happy to be safe at home while Muhammad is 
merely harmed by a thorn in his side.” 
   
  Abu Sufyan commented: “I have never seen anyone loving another more than 
Muhammad’s companions love him.”
   
  Later Muslims always wanted to know how the Prophet lived among his 
companions and how they treated him. When we consider that the Prophet was at 
the same time the head of the Islamic state that was to stretch over the whole 
of Arabia during his lifetime, comparison with the behavior of kings and rulers 
is often suggested. We, however, make no such comparison because it would never 
hold. We speak of the Prophet’s behavior and let people draw their own 
conclusions. 
   
  Some people visited Zayd ibn Thabit, who was a young man during the Prophet’s 
lifetime and one who learned the Qur’an by heart. They asked him to tell them 
about the Prophet and what he knew of him. He said: “What shall I tell you? I 
was his neighbor. 
   
  When he received revelations from on high, he would call me and I would write 
it down for him. On the other hand, when we spoke about this life, he would 
discuss it with us; and if we spoke about the life hereafter, he would also 
speak about it; and if we mentioned food, he would join our conversation. This 
is what I can tell you about God’s Messenger (peace be upon him.)” [Related by 
Al-Tirmidhi, Al-Baghawi, and Al-Tabarani.]
   
  This Hadith gives us the image of one who was just a member of a group, or a 
community, having the same concerns and interests. But he was the one they 
loved most, and he was keen to maintain the feeling that he was truly one of 
them. 
   
  Anas reports: “No one did they love to see at any time more than God’s 
Messenger (peace be upon him). Yet when they saw him coming, they wouldn’t 
stand up to greet him, because they realized he disliked that they should.” 
(Related by Al-Bukhari in Al-Adab Al-Mufrad, Al-Tirmidhi and Al-Baghawi.)
   
  That his companions loved to see him most is certainly right. They recognized 
that he only told them what was good for them, conveying to them God’s 
revelations, and telling them what sets their life on the right course. 
   
  He taught them good manners and fine principles; and he also sorted out their 
problems. They learned by experience that nothing but good came to them through 
him. Hence, their love of the Prophet was paramount in their feelings. Yet when 
they saw him coming, they did not stand up because he disliked that. This means 
that when they remained seated, they were only doing what pleased him. 
   
  This may beg the question concerning the ruling on whether people could stand 
to greet friends or superiors when they meet them. 
   
  The first point to mention in reply is that the Prophet’s companions were 
fully aware of his modesty. Secondly, he was keen to teach them by practical 

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Salman RushDIE - Fighting Words on a NIGHTHood

2007-07-16 Thread Alan Border
“BANKRUPT Non Muslims”
  “The Non Muslim World Has Lost All Hope in Trying to Take the Muslims Away 
from the Path of Islam by Using Methods from Outside the House of Islam. 
Instead They are Trying to Deviate / Confuse the Muslims By Using the APOSTATES 
(Murtads) – Individuals Who Will BARTER Anything for a Few Hours of FAME – to 
Do Their DIRTY Work.” - AB
  Salman Rushdie: Fighting Words on a Knighthood By Rachel Donadio 
  Published: July 4, 2007
  http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/04/arts/15donadio.php?page=1
   
  When Britain awarded a knighthood to Salman Rushdie last month, many across 
the Muslim world protested. They viewed the honor as a direct insult, an 
official endorsement of a writer whose novel "The Satanic Verses" they deemed a 
blasphemous attack on Islam. The Iranian government denounced it as "an obvious 
example of fighting against Islam by high-ranking British officials." The 
Pakistani Parliament passed a resolution condemning the knighthood, while the 
minister of religious affairs suggested it would justify future suicide 
bombings. In a letter to The Guardian, the leaders of 12 British Muslim groups 
decried the knighthood as "a deliberate provocation and insult to the 1.5 
billion Muslims around the world."
   
  The response prompted flashbacks to February 1989, when Ayatollah Ruhollah 
Khomeini issued a fatwa sentencing Rushdie and his publishers to death. These 
days, most intellectuals and editorialists are on Rushdie's side, as they were 
back then. But it's instructive to return to the fatwa period, when some 
important literary and political voices were critical of Rushdie.
   
  Among them was Jimmy Carter. In a March 1989 Op-Ed article in The New York 
Times titled "Rushdie's Book Is an Insult," Carter argued that "The Satanic 
Verses" was guilty of "vilifying" Muhammad and "defaming" the Koran. "The 
author, a well-versed analyst of Moslem beliefs, must have anticipated a 
horrified reaction throughout the Islamic world," Carter wrote. While 
condemning the death sentence and affirming Rushdie's right to free speech, the 
former president argued that "we have tended to promote him and his book with 
little acknowledgment that it is a direct insult to those millions of Moslems 
whose sacred beliefs have been violated and are suffering in restrained silence 
the added embarrassment of the Ayatollah's irresponsibility."
   
  Another critic was the novelist and essayist John Berger, who wrote in The 
Guardian in February 1989: "I suspect that Salman Rushdie, if he is not caught 
in a chain of events of which he has completely lost control, might, by now, be 
ready to consider asking his world publishers to stop producing more or new 
editions of 'The Satanic Verses.' Not because of the threat of his own life, 
but because of the threat to the lives of those who are innocent of either 
writing or reading the book. This achieved — Islamic leaders and statesmen 
across the world might well be ready to condemn the practice of the Ayatollah 
issuing terrorist death warrants. Otherwise a unique 20th-century holy war, 
with its terrifying righteousness on both sides, may be on the point of 
breaking out sporadically but repeatedly - in airports, shopping streets, 
suburbs, city centers, wherever the unprotected live."
   
  Roald Dahl was even sterner. In a letter to The Times of London, Dahl called 
Rushdie "a dangerous opportunist," saying he "must have been totally aware of 
the deep and violent feelings his book would stir up among devout Muslims. In 
other words, he knew exactly what he was doing and cannot plead otherwise. This 
kind of sensationalism does indeed get an indifferent book on to the top of the 
best-seller list, — but to my mind it is a cheap way of doing it." The author 
of dark children's books and stories for adults (who himself once had police 
protection after getting death threats) also advocated self-censorship. It 
"puts a severe strain on the very power principle that the writer has an 
absolute right to say what he likes," he wrote. "In a civilized world we all 
have a moral obligation to apply a modicum of censorship to our own work in 
order to reinforce this principle of free speech."
   
  While calling the death sentence outrageous, John le Carré agreed. "I don't 
think it is given to any of us to be impertinent to great religions with 
impunity," the spy novelist told The New York Times in May 1989. "I am 
mystified that he hasn't said: 'It's all a mess. My book has been wildly 
misunderstood, but as long as human lives are being wasted on account of it, I 
propose to withdraw it.' I have to say that would be my position." Le Carré 
elaborated in "Salman Rushdie: Sentenced to Death" (1990), a biography by W.J. 
Weatherby. At a time when the leading American bookstore chains refused to 
carry the novel out of concern for their employees' safety, "again and again, 
it has been within his power to save the faces of his publishers and, wit

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Imam Faheem Shuaibe in Houston / 7/20-22/07

2007-07-16 Thread Curtis Sharif

Raza Pasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:RE: Imam Faheem Shuaibe in Houston
With Allah's Name, The Merciful Benefactor, The Merciful Redeemer
 Mercy Community Center 
 
 Leadership Development Seminar  
   
 Developing the Leader within You  
   
 With Imam Faheem Shuaibe
 Resident Imam Masjidul-Waritheen, Inc., Oakland California  
   
 Friday July 20 through Sunday July 22  
   
 5541 Bellfort Street, Houston, Texas 77207  
   
 Jum'ah - Friday 1:30 p.m.  
   
 Seminar Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.  
   
 Public Address Sunday 12:15 p.m.  
   
 All events will be held at the Houston Masjid of Al-Islam  
 
   
 
 
 
 www.mercycc.org
 
 
 
 If you want to be removed from our email list please reply back with your 
request.
 
 
 
   
 
  

 
   
-
Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] The Role of the Identity Crisis in the muslim world

2007-07-16 Thread saiyed shahbazi
In recent years, Muslim scholars and interested observers have been challenged 
to find a reasonable explanation for the violence used by minority militant 
Muslim groups to achieve their objectives in Algeria and Egypt, to name two 
examples. The attacks of 11 September 2001 on the Pentagon in Washington, DC 
and the World Trade Center in New York brought the problem of Muslim extremism 
to the surface and put it under the international microscope. To discuss the 
problem rationally and place it in its proper context, we need to examine the 
various factors that culminated in such tragic events as these attacks, which 
were notorious for their intensity and widespread repercussions, and, more 
recently, the killing by al‑Zarqawi’s followers of innocent people in 
Iraq, most of whom have been women and children.

 Historical Background  The historical factor is treated very briefly. The 
origins of Muslim intolerance and militancy can be traced back to the 
absolutist religious group known as the Kharijites (Arabic: Khawârij – 
literally, “the secessionists”), who slaughtered numerous Muslims and 
non-Muslims in the seventh century ac. They were even responsible for the 
assassination of the Fourth Caliph, Imam ‘Ali, who was the cousin and 
son-in-law of the Prophet. This intolerant group took the literal meaning of 
every word of the Qur’an and made it the source of their legitimate authority.
  The Kharijites were succeeded by the Umayyads in 661 ac, who seized power by 
force and without the popular support that had previously characterized the 
caliphate. Their rule was marked by the language of the sword, apart from the 
period when ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al‑‘Aziz was in power. During the 81 years of 
their dynasty, the Umayyads consolidated their rule by distorting numerous 
hadiths (Sayings and Traditions) of the Holy Prophet and good examples of 
caliphate practice as well as confusing a number of scholars in their 
interpretation of the Qur’an and other sacred texts. In 750 ac, the Umayyads 
were toppled by the even bloodier Abbasid dynasty, which ruled until 1258 and 
often adopted violent means of silencing opposition.
  During the Abbasid era, the Arabs and Muslims reached the pinnacle of 
knowledge and transmitted Greco-Roman philosophy to the Western world. However, 
there also emerged minority groups that totally contradicted mainstream Muslims 
and which resorted to violence to impose their doctrine on them.
  This era also witnessed the birth of analytical tools, such as qiyas or 
analogy (literally, measurement), which affected the correct interpretation of 
the Islamic texts from the perspective of time and place. Thus began a culture 
in many parts of the Muslim world, which ultimately resulted in Muslim 
governments basing their policies on imitation or on the analysis of current 
problems with the historical understanding of a text. This practice 
contradicted the essence of the Qur’an, which stipulates that the use of reason 
is one of the most important of God’s Commandments.
  During both the Mogul and the Ottoman empires, extreme violence was used to 
suppress dissent, thus further intensifying the Muslim mentality that saw 
everything in a single dimension and considered questions from a single 
perspective. This attitude was quite a departure from the Qur’an, which 
challenges people to reflect, and which defines itself as a book for those who 
think and reflect.
  The type of intellect thus produced and maintained over many hundreds of 
years culminated in the emergence of inward-looking, intolerant and puritanical 
groups during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, which evolved and 
matured in the twentieth century. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized here 
that, historically speaking, these groups were the minority in the Ummah. Like 
all religious extremists, they exploited Islam by imposing their own reading of 
the Qur’an and by applying selective tools, which were very often outdated, to 
interpret history.
  Thus, the combination of this historical background, centuries of mental and 
social stagnation, and lack of mobility over generations has established the 
heritage of a society that allows no room for the Other’s opinion. The result 
has been the corruption of some of the most important basic Islamic values, 
such as tolerance and the ethics of diversity and decency, and the creation of 
social inertia.
  The crisis in society in general has penetrated the family circle with the 
very real risk of stifling the development of children. Not enough emphasis is 
placed on childhood during the upbringing of individuals. In the absence of the 
father “as the head of the family”, the dominant view is that of the eldest 
son. Schoolteachers very often resort to corporal punishment, which is 
continued in other areas of society such as the armed forces. The police and 
intelligence services also play an oppressive role, as do most of the 
opposition parties, where they ex

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Iran demands oil pay in yen not dollars

2007-07-16 Thread Abhiyya 2006
 Iran demands oil pay in yen not dollars The dollar fell against  the yen this 
afternoon on reports Iran has asked Japan to stop paying for its  oil in dollars
   Robert Lindsay
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article2070938.ece



 The dollar was driven down against the Japanese yen this afternoon, hit by  
the news that Iran had asked Japan to pay for its oil purchases in the Japanese 
 currency and not in dollars. 
 Iran has sent a letter to Japanese refiners, signed by Ali A Arshi, the  
general manager of crude marketing and exports for Iran's national Iranian Oil  
Company, according to a report by Bloomberg. 
 The letter asks for yen payments "for any/all of your forthcoming Iranian  
crude oil liftings." The request is for all shipments "effective immediately".  
 Japan's oil payments to Iran rose 12 per cent last year to 1.24 trillion yen  
(£5 billion). 
  function pictureGalleryPopup(pubUrl,articleId) { var newWin = 
window.open(pubUrl+'template/2.0-0/element/pictureGalleryPopup.jsp?id='+articleId+'&offset=0§ionName=IndustrySectorsNaturalResources','mywindow','menubar=0,resizable=0,width=615,height=655');
 } Related Links
   
   Dollar  dive lifts pound above $2.03 
 
   S&P  fears credit crunch 
 
   Sub-prime warning drives  dollar to record lows 


  
 The yen dropped against the dollar initially coming down to below 120 from  
122.40 but later recovered somewhat on strong consumer confidence data from the 
 US. 
 Iran has been deliberately moving its exposure to the dollar and dollar-based  
assets, faced with the threat that the US could freeze its US-based dollar  
accounts in response to its nuclear plans. 
 Three big oil producing nations — Iran, Venezuela and Russia — have all been  
moving much of their foreign currency reserves from dollars to euros in recent  
months. 
 The latest move can only add to the long term pressure on the dollar, already  
hit by worries about the US economy based on the crisis in the sub-prime  
mortgage market. 
 It was also under pressure against the euro and sterling as US retail sales  
for June showed their sharpest drop for two years. This was later countered by  
consumer sentiment data showing consumers had high confidence in July. 
 By mid session Wall Street was trading up on its record rise from yesterday  
with the Dow Jones index up 29 points at 13890. 
 Against the euro the dollar was still close to all-time highs this afternoon  
at $1.378 and against sterling it was $2.033. 



With Regards 

Abi
   
-
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Guantanamo Detainee - Testimony of Jumah Al-Dossari (Part 1)

2007-07-16 Thread Alan Border
“When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "Why, we 
only Want to make peace!"  Of a surety, they are the ones who make mischief, 
but they realise (it) not.”
  (Al-Qur'an, 2:11-12  - Al-Baqara [The Cow])
  Days of Adverse Hardship in US detention Camps - Testimony of Guantánamo 
Detainee Jumah al-Dossari
   
  http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR511072005
   
  Below is the testimony of Jumah al-Dossari, which he wrote in July 2005 in 
the US detention facility at Guantánamo Bay naval base, Cuba. The hand written 
testimony was given to Amnesty International by Jumah al-Dossari’s civilian 
lawyer. At the date of publication Jumah al-Dossari remains detained in 
Guantánamo Bay. This testimony is Jumah al-Dossari’s personal account of his 
experiences in Pakistani and US custody, and the views expressed in it are his 
own.
   
  "When I took up a pen and decided to write about what I have suffered and my 
tragedy, I was unable to decide where and how I should start. What I have seen 
is a huge tragedy and a weighty matter, far weightier than I can put to paper. 
Indeed, the enormous horrors that my eyes have seen have and continue to see 
renew my anxiety and pain and my very being and feelings are shaken at the mere 
thought or flash of them in my memory. How can my heart forget them and how can 
my soul who bore these horrors continue with life? As I hold my pen, my hand is 
shaking. How will I write about these tragedies? Yes, tragedies, in all the 
possible meanings of the word. How will I write about these horrors and must I 
swallow the bitter lump that forms in my throat when I remember them? The 
revolting torture and those vile attacks which were a humiliation and will 
continue to be a vile stain on history, memories that whenever I look back on 
them, I wonder how my soft heart could bear them,
 how my body could bear the pain of the torture and how my mind could bear all 
that stress. How I wish my memories and my thoughts could be forgotten. 
   
  But for me, in forgetting it and its effects, there are still memories, 
lifelong evidence of what happened to me in my wounds, my afflictions, my pain 
and my sadness. From here, in the gloom of prisons and from the depths of the 
detention camp, I am writing about what I have suffered. I am writing about my 
pain and my suffering. I am writing a story that has no end. I am writing about 
the suffering I have sustained for months and years. From here, from behind the 
walls of these dreadful cells, I am writing these lines about the part of my 
life that has come to pass, and which is still continuing, in American 
detention camps; lines about humiliation, indignity, oppression, deprivation 
and attacks on my religion, my person, my dignity and my humanity. From here, 
from the depths of the degradation that debase a person’s dignity, attack his 
religion, his person, his honour, his dignity and his humanity, all in the name 
of fighting terror. I am writing for those who will read
 my words. 
   
  I am writing the story of what I have suffered from the day I was kidnapped 
on the Pakistani border and sold to American troops until now and my being in 
Guantánamo, Cuba. What I will write here is not a flight of fancy or a moment 
of madness; what I will write here are the established facts and events agreed 
upon by detainees who were eye witnesses to them, representatives of the 
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) as well as soldiers, 
investigators and interpreters. All of these incidents have been filmed on 
camera and the film is kept in a secret archive somewhere.
   
  Arrest and Treatment by Pakistani Authorities
  
"My suffering and my tragedy started when I reached the Pakistani border on my 
way out of Afghanistan. There I met a unit from the Pakistani army who were 
there to kidnap people leaving Afghanistan. When I met them, I told them that I 
wanted to go to my country’s embassy; they welcomed me with all their 
treachery, cunning and wickedness and started transferring me from prison to 
prison along the border and even the Pakistani military base in the border town 
of Kohat. I passed through several small jails where there was a lot of abuse. 
I had previously met several people when I was on the border, they were of 
different nationalities. They had left Afghanistan and the Pakistani army 
abused us and gave us the worst and most nasty kind of food. 
  They put me in a cell which was 4m x 4m in which there were 59 prisoners 
without mattresses, blankets or a bathroom; there was only one bucket in the 
cell for everyone to relieve themselves in without a screen. Because there were 
so many of us in such a small place, we sat without moving and we were so close 
together that we almost felt suffocated. We remained in this situation for 
several days. They did not give us any food except for a few hard loaves of 
bread. The men started paying them to buy us food. They stole the money and

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] The Shahadatain (two testimonies); its meaning, pillars, conditions, requisites and nullifiers

2007-07-16 Thread abdullah
   
   
  As-Sunnah Vol. 2 Issue No. 9
   
  The Shahadatain (two testimonies); its meaning, pillars, conditions, 
requisites and nullifiers
   
  Category 2: Tawheed al-Uluhiyah
Chapter 2: The Shahadatain (two testimonies); its meaning, pillars, conditions, 
requisites and nullifiers
   
  The Meaning of Shahadatain (the two testimonies)

Meaning of the testimony La ilaha illAllah is to believe and affirm that no one 
deserves worship except Allah, holding on to it and acting in accordance with 
it. 'La ilah' is negating that anybody has the right to be worshiped except 
Allah, whoever it might be. 'IllAllah' is affirming the Right of Allah Alone to 
be worshiped. So, the complete meaning of the statement is 'La Ma'bood BiHaqqin 
illAllah', 'there is no deity truly worthy of being worshiped except Allah.' 
The word La (there is none), must accompany BiHaqqin (truly worthy of) and it 
is not permissible to use the word, 'Mawjood' (existing) because it is against 
the reality. There are many deities worshiped other than Allah and (saying, 'La 
Ma'bood Mawjood illAllah') will imply that worship of all these deities is 
worship of Allah and this is the most false statement and it is the Madhhab 
(position) of the people of Wahdat al-Wujood (pantheism), who are the most 
deviant people on the face of the earth. This
 statement (i.e. the first testimony) has been explained with numerous deviant 
interpretations, from them are:

1. La Ma'bood illAllah (there is no deity in existence except Allah). This is 
the most deviant interpretation because it means that every true and false 
deity is Allah as has been explained above. 

2. La Khaliq illAllah (there is no Creator except Allah). This is only a part 
of the meaning of the statement, but this is not the intent as it only confirms 
Tawheed ar-Rububiyah, which is not enough (to enter Islam) and is the Tawheed 
of the Mushrikeen (i.e., the pagans admit to Allah's Rububiyah and commit Shirk 
in His worship). 

3. La Hakimiyah illAllah (there is no judgment except for Allah). This is also 
only a part of the meaning of the statement and is not the intent because it is 
not enough. Because if one singles out Allah for judgment only and invokes 
other than Allah, then he has dedicated a form of worship to other than Allah 
and thus, he is not a muwahhid (one who declares and establishes Tawheed in its 
correct manner). 

All these interpretations are false and incomplete, and we have mentioned them 
here because they are found in some contemporary book. The correct meaning of 
the statement according to the Salaf as mentioned before is to say, 'La Ma'bood 
BiHaqqin illAllah' (there is none truly worthy of being worshiped except 
Allah). 

The Meaning of the testimony, Muhammadar-Rasoolullah. It is to affirm inwardly 
and outwardly that he (sallalalhu alaihi wa-sallam) is a slave of Allah and His 
Messenger to all people, and to act in accordance to it's requirements which 
are;

a) Obedience to him (sallalalhu alaihi wa-sallam) in everything that he orders,

b) Believing in everything he (sallalalhu alaihi wa-sallam) has informed us of,

c) Refraining from everything that he (sallalalhu alaihi wa-sallam) has 
prohibited and 

d) Not to worship Allah except in the way he (sallalalhu alaihi wa-sallam) has 
prescribed. 

  

  Taken from As-Sunnah Newsletter - http://www.qsep.com

   
-
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Rajab (The 7th Month)

2007-07-16 Thread �����\(-� ���� ޮ���ꧧ �-\)����
The Prophet said, "Time has come back to its original state which it had
when Allah created the Heavens and the Earth; the year is twelve months,
four of which are sacred. Three of them are in succession; Dhul-Qa'da,
Dhul-Hijja and Al-Muharram, and (the fourth being) Rajab Mudar (named after
the tribe of Mudar as they used to respect this month) which stands between
Jumad (ath-thani) and Sha'ban."

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith
*Hadith 4.419* Narrated by *Abu Bakra*

The Prophet said. "(The division of time has turned to its original form
which was current when Allah created the Heavens and the Earths. The year is
of twelve months, out of which four months are sacred: Three are in
succession Dhul-Qa'da, Dhul-Hijja and Muharram, and (the fourth is) Rajab of
(the tribe of) Mudar which comes between Jumadi-ath-Thaniyah and Sha ban."

*'Allahumma baa-rik-lanaa fee-rajaba wa sha'baana wa bal-lig-naa shah-ra
ramadhaana.' ** *

'O Allah, make the months of Rajab and Shabaan blessed for us, and let us
reach the month of Ramadhan.'

   
  *Brief Ibaadah
   
   - Schedule dates that need to be observed for max barakah*
note: Read 30 rakah on 1st 15th and 30th of Rajab pray 10 rakat nafil namaz
in 2 rakat salam. In each rakat after Alhamdo pray Surah Kaferoon 3 times
and Surah Ikhlas (kulhuwalla) 3 times each has its dua

1- Fast -1st day of Rajab have Ghusl- bath for cleansing all sins - pray 10
rakat nafil namaz in 2 rakat salam. In each rakat after Alhamdo pray Surah
Kaferoon 3 times and Surah Ikhlas (kulhuwalla) 3 times. After completing the
namaz -

Dua for 1st Rajab: "La Ilaha illallaho wahdahu la sharika lahu lahul-mulko
walahul-hamdo yoh-yi wa yo mito wahuwa hay-yil-la yamuto biyaaadie-hil
-khair wahuwa ala kulle shai-een kadir, Allahumma la man-a. le maa aat-taa,
wa la mua-tiya, le maa man-aata, wa layunfeo zuljadde min-kal jaddo.

2- Fast 1st Friday night (Thursday night in Islam) Night of wishes laylat
al-ragha'ib -
In the evening between Maghrib and `Isha, perform 12 units (Rak'at) of
prayer, in two's (i.e. two at a time). In each unit recite: 3 times
Sura-al-Qadr & then 12 times (Qul huwallahu) followed with dua - read below
full details

3-Fast -15th day of Rajab Ghusl- bath -for cleansing all sins- pray 10 rakah
like 1st and with Dua : "Illahan-wahedan, ahadan samadan wa faradaow wa
witran lam yattakhiz sahebataow wa la waladan."

4- Fast -27th Mi'raj Night much ibdaah to do - to be added

5- Fast -30th day of Rajab Ghusl- bath -for cleansing all sins - Pray 10
rakah like 1st day t with Dua - ast day of Rajab: "Allahumma sallai ala
Sayidina Mohammadiuw wa all hittaherin, wa la hawla kuwwata ilia billa-hil
Aliyil Azim. "

After reciting the above 30 rakah, pray for whatever your requirements.
Insha-Allah these will be answered, and on the day of resurrection, there
will be 70 trenches between you and Hell and each of these trenches will be
so wide it would take 500 years to cross one. In addition each rakat has the
reward of 1000 rakats.

Everyday read '*Allahumma baa-rik-lanaa fee-rajaba wa sha'baana wa
bal-lig-naa shah-ra ramadhaana.* ' *see top for arabic *'O Allah, make the
months of Rajab and Shabaan blessed for us,and let us reah the month of ramzan.
   
  Fasting in Rajab ones drinks from a River of Paradise called Rajab Only for
those who observed fasting in Rajab also a palace for Only those whose
frequntly fasted in Rajab.

Grave punishment will be stopped if one fasts only day of Rajab

In order to enter Ramadhaan in the best possible manner, one has to prepare
himself in the months of Rajab and Shabaan. It has been said that Rajab is
the month to sow seeds (good actions), Shabaan is the month in which we
should water those seeds (with tears of sorrow) and Ramadhaan is the month
in which we reap the harvest.

   
   


 

   
-
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally,  mobile search that gives answers, not web links. 

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] The Holy Qur'aan

2007-07-16 Thread Muhammad Abdul-Rahman
-
(Reference:  http://books.google.co.uk/books?vid=ISBN1861791542)
-

10197: The Holy Qur'aan 

Question: 

What is the Qur'aan? 


Answer: 

Praise be to Allaah. 

The Qur'aan is the word of the Lord of the Worlds, which Allaah revealed to His 
Messenger Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), to bring 
mankind forth from darkness into light: 

"It is He Who sends down manifest Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, 
signs, revelations, etc.) to His slave (Muhammad) that He may bring you out 
from darkness into light 

[al-Hadeed 57:9 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

Allaah has told us in the Qur'aan the stories of the earlier and later 
generations and the creation of the heavens and the earth. He has explained in 
detail what is halaal and what is haraam, the basics of good manners and 
morals, the rulings of worship and dealings with others, the lives of the 
Prophets and the righteous, and the reward and punishment of the believers and 
disbelievers. He has described Paradise, the abode of the believers, and He has 
described Hell, the abode of the disbelievers. He has made it (the Qur'aan) an 
explanation of all things: 

"And We have sent down to you the Book (the Qur'aan) as an exposition of 
everything, a guidance, a mercy, and glad tidings for those who have submitted 
themselves (to Allaah as Muslims)" 

[al-Nahl 16:89 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

The Qur'aan explains the names and attributes of Allaah and what He has 
created. It calls us to believe in Allaah, His angels, His Books, His 
Messengers and the Last Day: 

"The Messenger (Muhammad) believes in what has been sent down to him from his 
Lord, and (so do) the believers. Each one believes in Allaah, His Angels, His 
Books, and His Messengers. (They say,) `We make no distinction between one 
another of His Messengers' — and they say, `We hear, and we obey. (We seek) 
Your forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the return (of all)'" 

[al-Baqarah 2:285 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

The Qur'aan describes the Day of Judgement and what will happen after death _ 
the resurrection, the gathering, the judgement and being brought to account. It 
describes the Cistern, the Siraat (bridge over Hell), the Balance [in which 
deeds will be weighed], the blessings and torment, and the gathering of mankind 
on that great Day: 

"Allaah! Laa ilaaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He). 
Surely, He will gather you together on the Day of Resurrection about which 
there is no doubt. And who is truer in statement than Allaah? 

[al-Nisaa' 4:87 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

The Qur'aan calls us to examine and ponder the signs of Allaah in the universe 
and the verses of the Qur'aan: 

"Say: `Behold all that is in the heavens and the earth'" 

[Yoonus 10:101 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

"Do they not then think deeply in the Qur'aan, or are their hearts locked up 
(from understanding it)?" 

[Muhammad 47:24 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

The Qur'aan is the Book of Allaah for all of mankind: 

"Verily, We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book (this Qur'aan) for 
mankind in truth. So whosoever accepts the guidance, it is only for his 
ownself; and whosoever goes astray, he goes astray only for his (own) loss. And 
you (O Muhammad) are not a Wakeel (trustee or disposer of affairs, or guardian) 
over them"[al-Zumar 39:41 _ interpretation of the meaning] 

The Qur'aan confirms the Books which came before it, the Tawraat (Torah) and 
Injeel (Gospel), and it is a witness over them, as Allaah says (interpretation 
of the meaning): 

"And We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book (this Qur'aan) in truth, 
confirming the Scripture that came before it and Muhaymin (trustworthy in 
highness and a witness) over it (old Scriptures)"[al-Maa'idah 5:48] 

After the Qur'aan was revealed, it became the Book for all of mankind until the 
Hour begins. Whoever does not believe in it is a kaafir who will be punished 
with torment on the Day of Resurrection, as Allaah says (interpretation of the 
meaning): 

"But those who reject Our Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, 
revelations, etc.), the torment will touch them for their disbelief (and for 
their belying the Message of Muhammad)"[al-An'aam 6:49] 

Because of the greatness of the Qur'aan and the signs, miracles, parables and 
lessons contained therein, in addition to its eloquence and beautiful style, 
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

"Had We sent down this Qur'aan on a mountain, you would surely have seen it 
humbling itself and rent asunder by the fear of Allaah. Such are the parables 
which We put forward to mankind that they may reflect"[al-Hashr 58:21] 

Allaah has challenged mankind and the jinn to produce something like it, even 
one soorah or one aayah, but they could not do that and will never be able to 
do that, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

"Say: `If the mankind and the jinn were together to