Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Dear All Muslims. MASHA ALLAH VERY GOOD ANALYSIS. DR. ZAKIR NAIK IS REALLY A PERFECT IN KNOWLEDGE. ALLAH SUBHANO TAULA MAY GIVE HIM MORE KNOWLEDGE. BY HIS DA'WA MANY GHAIR MUSLIMS HAVE EMBRASED ISLAM. YES, OF COURSE HE SEEMS TO BE A WAHABI, NO DOUBT. BUT ALL THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN ONE GOD, ONE MUSHKAL KUSHA, ONE HAJAT RAWAH ARE SAID TO BE WAHABI. MUHAMMAD BIN ABDUL WAHAB WAS A MAN WHO PREECHED LESSON OF TAUHEED OF ALLAH. SO HE WAS DECLARED WAHABI. WAHABISM IS NOT A MASLIK. SOME PEOPLE SAY TO DEOBANDI'S ARE WAHABI. SOME PEOPLE SAY TO AHLE HADITH ARE WAHABI. THIS IS DUE TO LAKE OF KNOWLEDGE. WE ARE ALL MUSLIMS. WE HAVE BASICALLY TWO BOOKS, QURAN AND HADITH. LATER ON WHEN SOME FAQEE CAME, THEN SO MANY FIRQAJAT CAME INTO EXISTANCE. I WILL LIKE TO SAY IN INDO-PAK THERE ARE SO MANY FIRQAJAT, LIKE AHLE HADITH, DEOBANDI, BRELVI, SHAI, AHMEDI. IN ADDITIONS THERE ARE SO MANY MINOR FIRQAJAT. FOR US ONLY ATHENTIC BOOKS ARE QURAN AND HADITH. NO ONE CAN DENY THESE TWO BOOKS. ALL OTHER BOOKS WRITTEN BY VARIOUS SCHOLLARS CAN BE ACCEPTED/REJECTED EXCEPT THESE TWO. DR. ZAKIR NAIK GIVE QUOTATIONS FROM THESE TWO. HE IS A GREAT MAN OF THIS CENTURY. WE ALL PRAY FOR HIS LONG LIVING, AMEEN. SHAFI --- On Fri, 20/3/09, asy...@yahoo.com asy...@yahoo.com wrote: From: asy...@yahoo.com asy...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 20 March, 2009, 8:03 PM I have seen many different VCDs that show Zakir Naik speeches, and what he has said are mostly about tawheed. I don't think Zakir presents himself as a follower of Wahhabism or an enemy of any branch of Islamic teaching. He is clearly not an enemy Sufism. All he talk about is that followers of non-Islamic tawheed prinsiples and practices need to reflect on the way they search, define, and position the God. Tawheed is all about the logical thinking, so it is of course based on analytical ability. In many ways, knowledge very much helps someone to establish this ability. Dr Zakir Naik, alhamdulillah, proved himself of having a great strength, talent, and --above all-- skills to challenge what we believe as flawed theologies and, in turn, influence non-Muslims to accept the concept of the Oneness of Allah Subhanahu wa-Ta'aala. Look how many Hindus and Christians have embraced Islam after listening to Zakir's speeches. So, it hard to imagine that someone doesn't support him. He is just doing what we are all supposed to do : the propogation of Islam, the work of da'wah. Why someone has to narrow his/her mind by saying that Sufism is a threat of Wahhabism? I don't agree that someon in Islam is a threat to someone else. Peace be upon us all, brothers and sisters. Wassalam alaykum, Asyari Usman From: as...@yahoo. com as...@yahoo. com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 10:22:16 Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Zakir Naik always speak with references from Quran and Authentic Hadeeth and he never claim to belong any so called sects, you should also present references againt his speaches regardless of making the war of sufism and wahabism Send your renowned scholars to have a debate with Dr. Zakir Naik instead of sending these hatred messages From: sai...@yahoo. com sai...@yahoo. com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:33:10 AM Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom
Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
AssalaamualaikumDr. Zakir Naik is quoting the references during his talks. What else do people want? People are bent upon defaming and criticizing the learned ones. That could be because of what Dr. Zakir Naiknbsp;might have said, which could go against their ideology.Sufism believes that God is every where in the creation. It leads to pantheism. Thats against the teachings of the Qur'an and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him). Allah is above the heavens, above His mighty Throne. And His knowledge is present everywhere. He sees everything, He hears to everything, and He knows everything. Those who want to follow their grandfathers and great grand fathers, they may very well do that. But that may not be necessarily from the teachings of the Qur'an and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him).nbsp;In my view, Dr. Zakir Naik is doing an excellent job.UmarDIETnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:03:08 + (GMT) islamcity@yahoogroups.com wroteI have seen many different VCDs that show Zakir Naik speeches, and what he has said are mostly about tawheed. I don't think Zakir presents himself as a follower of Wahhabism or an enemy of any branch of Islamic teaching. He is clearly not an enemy Sufism. All he talk about is that followers of non-Islamic tawheed prinsiples and practices need to reflect on the way they search, define, and position the God.Tawheed is all about the logical thinking, so it is of course based on analytical ability. In many ways, knowledge very much helps someone to establish this ability. Dr Zakir Naik, alhamdulillah, proved himself of having a great strength, talent, and --above all-- skills to challenge what we believe as flawed theologies and, in turn, influence non-Muslims to accept the concept ofthe Oneness of Allah Subhanahu wa-Ta'aala. Look how many Hindus and Christians have embraced Islam after listening to Zakir's speeches.So, it hard to imagine that someone doesn't support him. He is just doing what we are all supposed to do : the propogation of Islam, the work of da'wah. Why someone has to narrow his/her mind by saying that Sufism is a threat of Wahhabism? I don't agree that someon in Islam is a threat to someone else.Peace be upon us all, brothers and sisters.Wassalam alaykum,Asyari Usman nbsp; From: as...@yahoo.comTo: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 10:22:16Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.Zakir Naik always speak with references from Quran and Authentic Hadeeth and he never claim to belong any so callednbsp;sects, you should also present references againt his speaches regardless of making the war of sufism and wahabismnbsp;Send your renowned scholars to have a debate with Dr. Zakir Naik instead of sending these hatrednbsp;messagesFrom: sai...@yahoo. com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:33:10 AMSubject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.Jamshed IqbalOne comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his âimmense knowledgeâ without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of âwisdomâ not âknowledgeâ.However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this âsubtle subversionâ that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of âscholarsâ of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an âall-purpose unitâ to bring my point home.A wise man may have some knowledge but âit does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wiseâ. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole.Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How?A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race.In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is
RE: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Assalam u alaikum Just to add what other two brothers, Brs. Aslam and Asyari. said. Zakir Naik or whoever, as long as serving Islam in right way is right and we should appreciate it instead of having bigots. Whatever Zakir Naik says for Islam, he presents Ayat from Quran and Hadeethes from 6 authentic book, yes if any one doesn't believe in Quran and these books, of course he will say Dr. Zakir Naik or any other scholar wrong, but this won't make any difference. Please all brothers and sister, ignore such stupid e-mails from people who want to put hatred and doubts about Islam and Islamic scholars, and see what is wrong and right with the help of Quran and Sunah, not by listening to crap from every Tom , Dick and Harry. Wassalam Inam ul Haq Raja Bio 21 Institute The University of Melbourne Flemingtom Rd., VIC 3010, Australia Mobile : + 61-4-31600027 http://sites.google.com/site/rajainaam/ To: islamcity@yahoogroups.com From: Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:03:08 + Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. I have seen many different VCDs that show Zakir Naik speeches, and what he has said are mostly about tawheed. I don't think Zakir presents himself as a follower of Wahhabism or an enemy of any branch of Islamic teaching. He is clearly not an enemy Sufism. All he talk about is that followers of non-Islamic tawheed prinsiples and practices need to reflect on the way they search, define, and position the God. Tawheed is all about the logical thinking, so it is of course based on analytical ability. In many ways, knowledge very much helps someone to establish this ability. Dr Zakir Naik, alhamdulillah, proved himself of having a great strength, talent, and --above all-- skills to challenge what we believe as flawed theologies and, in turn, influence non-Muslims to accept the concept of the Oneness of Allah Subhanahu wa-Ta'aala. Look how many Hindus and Christians have embraced Islam after listening to Zakir's speeches. So, it hard to imagine that someone doesn't support him. He is just doing what we are all supposed to do : the propogation of Islam, the work of da'wah. Why someone has to narrow his/her mind by saying that Sufism is a threat of Wahhabism? I don't agree that someon in Islam is a threat to someone else. Peace be upon us all, brothers and sisters. Wassalam alaykum, Asyari Usman From: as...@yahoo.com as...@yahoo.com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 10:22:16 Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Zakir Naik always speak with references from Quran and Authentic Hadeeth and he never claim to belong any so called sects, you should also present references againt his speaches regardless of making the war of sufism and wahabism Send your renowned scholars to have a debate with Dr. Zakir Naik instead of sending these hatred messages From: sai...@yahoo. com sai...@yahoo. com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:33:10 AM Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying
Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
I have seen many different VCDs that show Zakir Naik speeches, and what he has said are mostly about tawheed. I don't think Zakir presents himself as a follower of Wahhabism or an enemy of any branch of Islamic teaching. He is clearly not an enemy Sufism. All he talk about is that followers of non-Islamic tawheed prinsiples and practices need to reflect on the way they search, define, and position the God. Tawheed is all about the logical thinking, so it is of course based on analytical ability. In many ways, knowledge very much helps someone to establish this ability. Dr Zakir Naik, alhamdulillah, proved himself of having a great strength, talent, and --above all-- skills to challenge what we believe as flawed theologies and, in turn, influence non-Muslims to accept the concept of the Oneness of Allah Subhanahu wa-Ta'aala. Look how many Hindus and Christians have embraced Islam after listening to Zakir's speeches. So, it hard to imagine that someone doesn't support him. He is just doing what we are all supposed to do : the propogation of Islam, the work of da'wah. Why someone has to narrow his/her mind by saying that Sufism is a threat of Wahhabism? I don't agree that someon in Islam is a threat to someone else. Peace be upon us all, brothers and sisters. Wassalam alaykum, Asyari Usman From: as...@yahoo.com as...@yahoo.com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 10:22:16 Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Zakir Naik always speak with references from Quran and Authentic Hadeeth and he never claim to belong any so called sects, you should also present references againt his speaches regardless of making the war of sufism and wahabism Send your renowned scholars to have a debate with Dr. Zakir Naik instead of sending these hatred messages From: sai...@yahoo. com sai...@yahoo. com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:33:10 AM Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race. In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge. The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different
RE: Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
I think the best way to sort this would be to log on to www.abubakr.org. I would request everybody to go through it and to discuss the views so that a cleaerer understanding of the issues can be raised. Was salaam S --- On Sat, 2/28/09, ab...@yahoo.com ab...@yahoo.com wrote: From: ab...@yahoo.com ab...@yahoo.com Subject: RE: Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009, 7:08 AM There are two versions which according to me are shiah and sunni. One has to read the khutba Hajjatul Wida (The Last Sermon) which mentions the Holy Quran and Holy Prophet's Sunnah and the other Ahlul Bait for which sunnis also hold them in respect. Abdul Wahid Osman Belal To: islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com From: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:34:11 + Subject: Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaah respects the family of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alaihi wasallam) and also the companions of the Prophet. Unfortunately, shia have gone extreme in the religion by taking the family of Prophet as intermediaries, and by abusing the companions of the Prophet such as Umar and Abu Bakr(may Peace be upon them). Dr. Zakir Naik says what the scholars of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah say. If you are criticizing Dr. Zakir Naik, then you are also criticizing the stand of the Ahlus sunnsh wal Jamaah. visit www.islam-qa. com on issues relating to the deviance of the shia. On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:55:31 -0800 (PST) islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com wrote Mr. Shafi wrote However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, Either we accept his statement or not in both cases he has to defend his faith. A) Suppose Quran Hadith is Islam though its not supported by Nas-e-Quran, which is Quran Prophet's Sunnah. Shia Sunni unanimously agreed that theres no hadith is as authentic,as Mutawatir, as consistent as Hadith-e-Thaqalain- -Only Shia majority of sunni found this hadith as binding as consistent it is. Prophet says I am leaving behind Quran Ahlul-Baith stick with them--Hadith does not end here--It continues--Until they reach me at Hoz-e-Kausar. So Quran Ahlul Baith are inseperable until the judgment day--Its possible Zakir Naik preach Tauheed in his style convert few hindus but it does not give him certificate of Sirat-e-Mustaqeem. Islam is nothing but obedience to Allah obedience to Prophet(saw) because of obedience to Prophet as per His command obedience to Ahlul Baith is also Islam essential part of Eiman. Zakir Naik could never be bigger Maowwahid than Shaitan Iblees but he digressed as Shaitan when he thought he knew better than Allah how to worship Him. Worship means nothing but obedience--disregar ding ahlul baith is as bad deviation as that of Shaitan. --- On Sat, 2/14/09, muham...@yahoo. com wrote: From: muham...@yahoo. com Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 2:35 AM Dear All concerned. There is no Wahabism Islam in the World. A man with the name of Muhammad Bib Abdul Wahab who is follower of Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). Imam Ahmed Bib Hamble (Hambly Mazhab) is one out of four Mazhabs. It is said that these four Mazhabs are on Haq. Even then some persons having no knowledge of Islam do not hesitate to blame the Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). When we say that these four Mazhabs came into existance more than 100 years after the completion of Islam, and are not on the right path, even then some says that these four Mazhabs are on the right path. This is the admission of those people who blame Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab (Hambly Mazhab) as on right path and on the other hand these people blame Hambly Mazhab as on the wrong path. However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, the follower of these two books are also consideredWahabi by Qabar Parast group. Even I have seen some non-sense people who are basically from Mazhab Hanfi declare to the follower of Hanfi Mazhab as Wahabi. They have no sense of Islam. Mr. Zakir Naik from India is a great schollar of Islam. He has won so many Munazras with ghair Muslims. He is true follower of Islam. I have seen on Internet that so many Hindus and other people have converted / accepted Islam with his struggle and knowledge. May Allah give him more courage to spread true Islam in the continent. Please do not hear / take care of such mails which are spread to defame schollare of Islam. Thanks. Shafi --- On Tue, 10/2/09, sai...@yahoo. com wrote: From: sai...@yahoo. com Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 4:33 AM Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several
RE: Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
There are two versions which according to me are shiah and sunni. One has to read the khutba Hajjatul Wida (The Last Sermon) which mentions the Holy Quran and Holy Prophet's Sunnah and the other Ahlul Bait for which sunnis also hold them in respect. Abdul Wahid Osman Belal To: islamcity@yahoogroups.com From: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:34:11 + Subject: Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaah respects the family of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alaihi wasallam) and also the companions of the Prophet. Unfortunately, shia have gone extreme in the religion by taking the family of Prophet as intermediaries, and by abusing the companions of the Prophet such as Umar and Abu Bakr(may Peace be upon them). Dr. Zakir Naik says what the scholars of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah say. If you are criticizing Dr. Zakir Naik, then you are also criticizing the stand of the Ahlus sunnsh wal Jamaah. visit www.islam-qa.com on issues relating to the deviance of the shia. On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:55:31 -0800 (PST) islamcity@yahoogroups.com wrote Mr. Shafi wrote However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, Either we accept his statement or not in both cases he has to defend his faith. A) Suppose Quran Hadith is Islam though its not supported by Nas-e-Quran, which is Quran Prophet's Sunnah. Shia Sunni unanimously agreed that theres no hadith is as authentic,as Mutawatir, as consistent as Hadith-e-Thaqalain--Only Shia majority of sunni found this hadith as binding as consistent it is. Prophet says I am leaving behind Quran Ahlul-Baith stick with them--Hadith does not end here--It continues--Until they reach me at Hoz-e-Kausar. So Quran Ahlul Baith are inseperable until the judgment day--Its possible Zakir Naik preach Tauheed in his style convert few hindus but it does not give him certificate of Sirat-e-Mustaqeem. Islam is nothing but obedience to Allah obedience to Prophet(saw) because of obedience to Prophet as per His command obedience to Ahlul Baith is also Islam essential part of Eiman. Zakir Naik could never be bigger Maowwahid than Shaitan Iblees but he digressed as Shaitan when he thought he knew better than Allah how to worship Him. Worship means nothing but obedience--disregarding ahlul baith is as bad deviation as that of Shaitan. --- On Sat, 2/14/09, muham...@yahoo.com wrote: From: muham...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 2:35 AM Dear All concerned. There is no Wahabism Islam in the World. A man with the name of Muhammad Bib Abdul Wahab who is follower of Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). Imam Ahmed Bib Hamble (Hambly Mazhab) is one out of four Mazhabs. It is said that these four Mazhabs are on Haq. Even then some persons having no knowledge of Islam do not hesitate to blame the Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). When we say that these four Mazhabs came into existance more than 100 years after the completion of Islam, and are not on the right path, even then some says that these four Mazhabs are on the right path. This is the admission of those people who blame Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab (Hambly Mazhab) as on right path and on the other hand these people blame Hambly Mazhab as on the wrong path. However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, the follower of these two books are also consideredWahabi by Qabar Parast group. Even I have seen some non-sense people who are basically from Mazhab Hanfi declare to the follower of Hanfi Mazhab as Wahabi. They have no sense of Islam. Mr. Zakir Naik from India is a great schollar of Islam. He has won so many Munazras with ghair Muslims. He is true follower of Islam. I have seen on Internet that so many Hindus and other people have converted / accepted Islam with his struggle and knowledge. May Allah give him more courage to spread true Islam in the continent. Please do not hear / take care of such mails which are spread to defame schollare of Islam. Thanks. Shafi --- On Tue, 10/2/09, sai...@yahoo. com wrote: From: sai...@yahoo. com Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 4:33 AM Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity
Re :Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaah respects the family of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alaihi wasallam) and also the companions of the Prophet.Unfortunately, shia have gone extreme in the religion by taking the family of Prophet as intermediaries, and by abusing the companions of the Prophet such as Umar and Abu Bakr(may Peace be upon them).nbsp;Dr. Zakir Naik says what the scholars of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah say. If you are criticizing Dr. Zakir Naik, then you are also criticizing the stand of the Ahlus sunnsh wal Jamaah.visit www.islam-qa.com on issues relating to the deviance of the shia.On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:55:31 -0800 (PST) islamcity@yahoogroups.com wroteMr. Shafi wroteHowever, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, Either we accept his statement or not in both cases he has to defend his faith.A) Suppose Quran amp; Hadith is Islam though its not supported by Nas-e-Quran, which is Quran amp; Prophet's Sunnah.Shia amp; Sunni unanimously agreed that theres no hadith is as authentic,as Mutawatir, as consistent as Hadith-e-Thaqalain--Only Shia amp; majority of sunni found this hadith as binding as consistent it is.Prophet saysI am leaving behind Quran amp; Ahlul-Baith stick with them--Hadith does not end here--It continues--Until they reach me at Hoz-e-Kausar.So Quran amp; Ahlul Baith are inseperable until the judgment day--Its possible Zakir Naik preach Tauheed in his style amp; convert few hindus but it does not give him certificate of Sirat-e-Mustaqeem.Islam isnothing but obedience to Allah amp; obedience to Prophet(saw) because of obedience to Prophet as per His command obedience to Ahlul Baith is also Islam amp; essential part of Eiman.Zakir Naik could never be bigger Maowwahid than Shaitan Iblees but he digressed as Shaitan when he thought he knew better than Allah how to worship Him.Worship means nothing but obedience--disregarding ahlul baith is as bad deviation as that of Shaitan.--- On Sat, 2/14/09, muham...@yahoo.com wrote:From: muham...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 2:35 AMDear All concerned.nbsp;There is no Wahabism Islam in the World.nbsp; A man with the name of Muhammad Bib Abdul Wahab who isnbsp;follower of Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA).nbsp;nbsp;Imam AhmedBib Hamble (Hambly Mazhab) is one out of four Mazhabs.nbsp; It is said thatnbsp;these fourMazhabs are on Haq.nbsp; Even then somenbsp;persons having no knowledge of Islam do not hesitate to blame the Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). nbsp;When we say that these four Mazhabsnbsp;came into existancenbsp;more than 100 yearsnbsp; after the completion of Islam, and are not on the right path,nbsp;even then some says that these four Mazhabs are on the right path.nbsp; This is the admission of those people who blame Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab (Hambly Mazhab)nbsp;asnbsp;on right path and on the other handthese people blame Hambly Mazhab as on the wrong path.nbsp;nbsp;However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith,nbsp;the follower of these two books arenbsp;also consideredWahabi by Qabar Parast group.nbsp;nbsp; Even I have seennbsp;some non-sense people who are basically from Mazhab Hanfi declare to the follower of Hanfi Mazhab as Wahabi.nbsp; They have no sense of Islam.nbsp;Mr. Zakir Naik from India is a great schollar of Islam.nbsp; He hasnbsp;won so many Munazras withghair Muslims.nbsp; nbsp;He is true follower of Islam.nbsp; I have seen on Internet that so many Hindus and other people have converted / accepted Islam with his struggle and knowledge.nbsp;May Allah give him more courage to spread true Islam in the continent. nbsp;Please do not hear / take care of such mails which are spread to defame schollare of Islam.nbsp;Thanks.nbsp;Shafinbsp;--- On Tue, 10/2/09, sai...@yahoo. com wrote:From: sai...@yahoo. com Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 4:33 AMDr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.Jamshed IqbalOne comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his immense knowledge without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of wisdom not knowledge.However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this subtle subversion that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of scholars of this nature and use the name of Mr.
Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Mr. Shafi wrote However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, Either we accept his statement or not in both cases he has to defend his faith. A) Suppose Quran Hadith is Islam though its not supported by Nas-e-Quran, which is Quran Prophet's Sunnah. Shia Sunni unanimously agreed that theres no hadith is as authentic,as Mutawatir, as consistent as Hadith-e-Thaqalain--Only Shia majority of sunni found this hadith as binding as consistent it is. Prophet says I am leaving behind Quran Ahlul-Baith stick with them--Hadith does not end here--It continues--Until they reach me at Hoz-e-Kausar. So Quran Ahlul Baith are inseperable until the judgment day--Its possible Zakir Naik preach Tauheed in his style convert few hindus but it does not give him certificate of Sirat-e-Mustaqeem. Islam is nothing but obedience to Allah obedience to Prophet(saw) because of obedience to Prophet as per His command obedience to Ahlul Baith is also Islam essential part of Eiman. Zakir Naik could never be bigger Maowwahid than Shaitan Iblees but he digressed as Shaitan when he thought he knew better than Allah how to worship Him. Worship means nothing but obedience--disregarding ahlul baith is as bad deviation as that of Shaitan. --- On Sat, 2/14/09, muham...@yahoo.com muham...@yahoo.com wrote: From: muham...@yahoo.com muham...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 2:35 AM Dear All concerned. There is no Wahabism Islam in the World. A man with the name of Muhammad Bib Abdul Wahab who is follower of Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). Imam Ahmed Bib Hamble (Hambly Mazhab) is one out of four Mazhabs. It is said that these four Mazhabs are on Haq. Even then some persons having no knowledge of Islam do not hesitate to blame the Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). When we say that these four Mazhabs came into existance more than 100 years after the completion of Islam, and are not on the right path, even then some says that these four Mazhabs are on the right path. This is the admission of those people who blame Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab (Hambly Mazhab) as on right path and on the other hand these people blame Hambly Mazhab as on the wrong path. However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, the follower of these two books are also consideredWahabi by Qabar Parast group. Even I have seen some non-sense people who are basically from Mazhab Hanfi declare to the follower of Hanfi Mazhab as Wahabi. They have no sense of Islam. Mr. Zakir Naik from India is a great schollar of Islam. He has won so many Munazras with ghair Muslims. He is true follower of Islam. I have seen on Internet that so many Hindus and other people have converted / accepted Islam with his struggle and knowledge. May Allah give him more courage to spread true Islam in the continent. Please do not hear / take care of such mails which are spread to defame schollare of Islam. Thanks. Shafi --- On Tue, 10/2/09, sai...@yahoo. com sai...@yahoo. com wrote: From: sai...@yahoo. com sai...@yahoo. com Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamc...@yahoogrou ps.com Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 4:33 AM Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man
Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Zakir Naik always speak with references from Quran and Authentic Hadeeth and he never claim to belong any so called sects, you should also present references againt his speaches regardless of making the war of sufism and wahabism Send your renowned scholars to have a debate with Dr. Zakir Naik instead of sending these hatred messages From: sai...@yahoo.com sai...@yahoo.com To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:33:10 AM Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race. In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge. The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions cannot include what makes a human being a human being! Definitions, I mean to say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what makes human person a human person is nowhere, as no definition could be holistic! Moreover, in definition, metaphor or simile, as logic demands, is not allowed to make analytical thinking free from feelings but religious wisdom or morality is absurd or impossible without feelings! There is no room for aesthetics (beauty) in analysis and morality or wisdom gushes from these two springs as well! I think Islam is very clear about this point as: “Allah is beautiful and loves beauty”. Allah (The Supreme Reality) is truth and truth cannot be revealed unto those whose whole effort is demystification and dissection! Has analysis anything to do with “love”? Isn’t beauty a mystery so beyond the logic (Allah Him/Herself) ? Have analytical sciences, from so-called Enlightenment Age onwards, not been trying to demystify the mysterious phenomenon of existence or being? Was it not an organized effort to obliterate God from human consciousness? Has sciences (knowledge not wisdom) not been consciously trying to omit suggestiveness from natural phenomena to make it dull and ugly! There have a tendency among Quranic scholars—the tendency to count! For example word (or Ism-e-Zat) Allah has been used so many times in Quran. Mr. Zakir Naik
RE: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Dear All Dr. Zakir Naik is struggling hard. By his struggle many people from other religions have converted to Islam. Only people who are Worshippers of Qaboors do not like such noble persons. We pray for God to give more courage to Dr. Zakir to spread the Islam to maximum person. You have also objected that he is teaching like Saudi Arabia Wahabi. Do you think that Wahabi of Saudi Arabia are not true Muslims. If they are not true Muslims then no one is true Muslims. Understand. Avaoid to send such mails in future. Thanks. Shafi To: islamc...@yahoogroups.comfrom: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:33:10 -0800Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race. In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge. The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions cannot include what makes a human being a human being! Definitions, I mean to say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what makes human person a human person is nowhere, as no definition could be holistic! Moreover, in definition, metaphor or simile, as logic demands, is not allowed to make analytical thinking free from feelings but religious wisdom or morality is absurd or impossible without feelings! There is no room for aesthetics (beauty) in analysis and morality or wisdom gushes from these two springs as well! I think Islam is very clear about this point as: “Allah is beautiful and loves beauty”. Allah (The Supreme Reality) is truth and truth cannot be revealed unto those whose whole effort is demystification and dissection! Has analysis anything to do with “love”? Isn’t beauty a mystery so beyond the logic (Allah Him/Herself)? Have analytical sciences, from so-called Enlightenment Age onwards, not been trying to demystify the mysterious phenomenon of existence or being? Was it not an organized effort to obliterate God from human consciousness? Has sciences (knowledge not wisdom) not been consciously trying to omit suggestiveness from natural phenomena to make it dull and ugly! There have a tendency among Quranic scholars—the tendency
Re: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Dear All concerned. There is no Wahabism Islam in the World. A man with the name of Muhammad Bib Abdul Wahab who is follower of Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). Imam Ahmed Bib Hamble (Hambly Mazhab) is one out of four Mazhabs. It is said that these four Mazhabs are on Haq. Even then some persons having no knowledge of Islam do not hesitate to blame the Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA). When we say that these four Mazhabs came into existance more than 100 years after the completion of Islam, and are not on the right path, even then some says that these four Mazhabs are on the right path. This is the admission of those people who blame Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab (Hambly Mazhab) as on right path and on the other hand these people blame Hambly Mazhab as on the wrong path. However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, the follower of these two books are also consideredWahabi by Qabar Parast group. Even I have seen some non-sense people who are basically from Mazhab Hanfi declare to the follower of Hanfi Mazhab as Wahabi. They have no sense of Islam. Mr. Zakir Naik from India is a great schollar of Islam. He has won so many Munazras with ghair Muslims. He is true follower of Islam. I have seen on Internet that so many Hindus and other people have converted / accepted Islam with his struggle and knowledge. May Allah give him more courage to spread true Islam in the continent. Please do not hear / take care of such mails which are spread to defame schollare of Islam. Thanks. Shafi --- On Tue, 10/2/09, sai...@yahoo.com sai...@yahoo.com wrote: From: sai...@yahoo.com sai...@yahoo.com Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World islamcity@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 4:33 AM Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race. In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge. The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions cannot include what makes a human being a human being! Definitions, I mean to say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what makes human person
Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.
Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy. Jamshed Iqbal One comes across several interesting comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”. However, Mr. Naik is not an only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an “all-purpose unit” to bring my point home. A wise man may have some knowledge but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole. Men of knowledge without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it is irreligious! How? A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race. In such ways the pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge. The point is “so-called men of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about “material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions cannot include what makes a human being a human being! Definitions, I mean to say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what makes human person a human person is nowhere, as no definition could be holistic! Moreover, in definition, metaphor or simile, as logic demands, is not allowed to make analytical thinking free from feelings but religious wisdom or morality is absurd or impossible without feelings! There is no room for aesthetics (beauty) in analysis and morality or wisdom gushes from these two springs as well! I think Islam is very clear about this point as: “Allah is beautiful and loves beauty”. Allah (The Supreme Reality) is truth and truth cannot be revealed unto those whose whole effort is demystification and dissection! Has analysis anything to do with “love”? Isn’t beauty a mystery so beyond the logic (Allah Him/Herself)? Have analytical sciences, from so-called Enlightenment Age onwards, not been trying to demystify the mysterious phenomenon of existence or being? Was it not an organized effort to obliterate God from human consciousness? Has sciences (knowledge not wisdom) not been consciously trying to omit suggestiveness from natural phenomena to make it dull and ugly! There have a tendency among Quranic scholars—the tendency to count! For example word (or Ism-e-Zat) Allah has been used so many times in Quran. Mr. Zakir Naik, and others of course, can safely claim 10 GB memory containing these types of calculations. But, so far as I know, no one has told that how many similes and metaphors are used in Quran. How many attributes of Allah (the beneficent the merciful) reflect rationality and others feelings or emotions? Mr. Zakir Naik could not deny that Prophet Mohammad’s (May peace by upon him) holy life is an evergreen epic of compassion and empathy—the gift “to feel” with others! Remember once my Lord was running for milking the sheep to feed a crying cat when West was not familiar with “animal rights”! Was
