*Obama Cheers Ring Hollow in the **Mideast***

*Jonathan Steele | The Guardian*

*http://arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=112120&d=26&m=7&y=2008***

*What a contrast. In Western Europe Obama-mania is in full flood, epitomized
by raving crowds in Berlin last night as well as the polls which show the
Democratic candidate to be far more popular than John McCain in almost every
country. In **Israel** he is met with apprehension, and in the Palestinian
territories there is only the faintest hope that the deadlocked conflict
will ever end.*

*The difference is that Europeans know the American president holds the keys
to war or peace. He has enormous influence in dragging European governments
after him, as the disastrous **Iraq** adventure showed. So it is not
surprising that many Europeans are crying out for a man in the White House
who will be less aggressive, less unilateral, less imperial, and more
attuned to the complexities of international policy. Obama seems to be the
one. In the **Middle East** the **US** leader has much less power. **Israel*
* calls the shots, and what's happening on the ground is deeply gloomy and
anti-peace. The chances of creating a viable Palestinian state have almost
vanished as Israeli settlements on the **West Bank** go on increasing and
yet more checkpoints appear.*

No wonder that, while they like Obama more than McCain, Palestinians feel
little optimism. "Obama might create a different atmosphere," says Yasser
Abd Rabbo, the secretary-general of the Palestine Liberation Organization,
stressing the "might". "Bush polarized things between him and Osama Bin
Laden. The moderates were the big losers. People in the middle felt
crushed," he argues. Others expect Obama will take time to focus on the Middle
East in spite of his promise this week to be engaged in peace from day one.
"He'll concentrate first on Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and the economy, which
all matter more for Americans," an adviser to the Palestinian negotiating
team told me.

His visit to the Israeli border town of Sderot was one-sided, not just
because he did not balance it with visits to places where Palestinians are
oppressed. Sderot is more than a place under threat of terror. It is a model
for how cease-fires are negotiable, and why they are the vital first step
toward any serious peace agreement. Yet Obama ignored the point.

"Why have a cease-fire in Gaza, but not one in the West Bank? Do they want
us to develop missiles and rockets here before we can have a cease-fire?"
asks Mustafa Barghouti, one of the most respected independents in the
Palestinian Parliament. He points to the spate of arrests by Israeli troops
in recent weeks in Nablus, Hebron and Jenin, which have gone virtually
unreported. The Israelis conduct almost nightly raids on schools, clinics
and charities, seizing files, computers, and patients' records.

*Since Bush's **Annapolis** conference no progress has been made. In spite
of a half a dozen meetings with Mahmoud Abbas, the Israeli Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert refuses to put forward drafts for the framework deal that Bush
wanted to see signed before he leaves office. It is all talk but no work.
Going against peace, another 9,700 housing units for settlers have been
announced for **East Jerusalem**, compared with 1,600 in the previous four
years. Eighty-six new checkpoints have gone up in the **West Bank**.
Meanwhile, the EU chooses this moment to upgrade its cultural and economic
relations with **Israel**, forfeiting the little leverage it has.*

What could Obama do as president? Watching the candidate with Israel's
President Shimon Peres in Jerusalem this week, it was hard not to be touched
by the younger man's grace. As they strolled across the lawn before making
press statements, Obama inclined his head and put his hand gently on Peres'
back like a respectful son or even grandson. Peres repaid the compliment,
all but endorsing Obama. "I've read both your books and was impressed by
their moving humanity ... Those who say the future belongs to the young are
wrong. The present belongs to the young."

*The chances of a settlement have never been bleaker. The Palestinians are
deeply split between Fatah and Hamas, and without unity there is no way
Abbas can pretend to reach a deal with **Israel**. In **Israel** every
politician is a hard-liner, whether Kadima, Labour or Likud. "Olmert is
playing a game of deception when he says peace is close. The negotiations
are going in circles. Nothing is moving forward, except the confiscation of
land, the expansion of the wall, and the building of industrial zones round
the settlements. You can't trust them to want a deal this year, next year or
any year," says Abd Rabbo.*

On both sides the public mood is grim. Israeli attitudes toward the
Palestinians are built on fear — all-pervasive and sometimes turning into
panic. Palestinians are consumed with anger, rekindled by every new
injustice — an anger that sometimes turns to rage. It is no coincidence that
this year's attacks on Israelis in Jerusalem, the two bulldozer incidents
and the shooting of eight people at a yeshiva (school) in March, were done
by Palestinians not connected to any militia group. Private rage just boiled
over.

Faced by Israeli intransigence, no US president can do much. Perhaps the
only thing Obama could do is to work on the Palestinians. If he helps end
the futile boycott and demonization of Hamas, he will cease playing the
Israeli game and help the Palestinians re-create a united front. It would be
a step forward, though not enough for peace. The Israelis are not ready,
whatever they say.
*Obama, in **London**, Meets Brown and Blair* Democratic hopeful defends
decision to travel to Europe and Mideast



*updated **10:42 a.m. ET** **July 26, 2008** *

*http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25858777*

LONDON - Presidential contender Barack Obama defended his decision to travel
to Europe and the Middle East on Saturday, saying that problems encountered
by Americans at home are often best dealt with by working with allies
overseas. Obama, who spoke to reporters after wrapping up talks with British
Prime Minister Gordon Brown, said he wasn't sure if there would be any
immediate political impact from the trip.

*"The reason that I thought this trip was important is that I am convinced
that many issues that we face at home are not going to be solved as
effectively unless we have strong partners abroad," Obama said.*

Obama, a first-term senator, is in the midst of a tour that is designed to
burnish his international credentials for the general election campaign
against Republican rival Sen. John McCain. The trip began with a
campaign-season tour of the war zones in Iraq and Afghanistan and ends with
meetings with old allies France and Britain.

The Democratic hopeful seemed relaxed as he strolled down to the prime
minister's office at 10 Downing St., pausing briefly to shake the hands of
two somewhat startled police officers standing near the door. He turned to
television cameras, smiled, waved and said "Hello," before walking into
Number 10. Brown greeted him just inside the door.

Pooled television images showed Brown offering Obama a chair on the Downing
Street terrace before the pair settled down for two hours of talks. The pair
later took a stroll in the sunshine around Horse Guards Parade, the vast
open space where military reviews are often held. Tourists snapped pictures
while security guards walked ahead of the two men.

The stroll in the vast arena offered a photo opportunity with a
Londonbackdrop for Obama, whose visit to
London has been decidedly low-key, particularly after the huge crowds he
drew earlier in the week in Germany. Earlier, he met with former Prime
Minister Tony Blair, who is now a Middle East envoy. The meeting lasted for
just over an hour. Later, Obama was expected to meet with opposition leader
David Cameron of the Conservative Party.

*Meeting in Paris*

Obama arrived in London from Paris, where he met Friday with French
President Nicolas Sarkozy. Obama and Sarkozy discussed Iran, the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, climate change and other issues.

*Speaking later Friday at a news conference, Obama said **Iran** should
accept the proposals made by Sarkozy and other Western leaders. He urged **
Iran**'**s leaders not to wait for the next **U.S.** president to push them
"because the pressure, I think, is only going to build." The **United States
** and other Western nations accuse **Iran** of seeking to acquire nuclear
weapons and demand that it freeze its uranium enrichment program.
**Iran**says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
*

*Obama said that he and Sarkozy agreed that **Iran** poses "an
extraordinarily grave situation." He said the world must send "a clear
message to **Iran** to end its illicit nuclear program." Obama said: "My
expectation is that we**'**re going to present a clear choice to **Iran**:
change your behavior and you will be fully integrated into the international
community with all the benefits that go with that. Continue your illicit
nuclear program and the international community as a whole will ratchet up
pressure with stronger and increased sanctions. And we should have no
illusion that progress will come easily."*

*'We have to win'*

*Obama told reporters that "Afghanistan is a war we have to win." The
Taliban and terrorist groups it supports, he said, pose an unacceptable
threat to the United States, France and other nations. "We've got to finish
the job," said Obama, who often has said the Iraq war was an unwise move
that distracted the United States from efforts to find Osama bin Laden and
other terrorist leaders and to root out the Taliban forces in Afghanistan.*

Sarkozy said he agreed that the Taliban must be defeated in Afghanistan,
where French troops are part of a multinational force. The joint news
conference had many light moments. Sarkozy called his guest "my dear Barack
Obama," and said the French have been following the U.S. presidential race
"with passion." "It's fascinating to watch what's happening there," he said.

* *

*(c) 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.*

Reply via email to