The literal meaning of Fundamentalism is very different from its current 
popular useage. The phrase 'authentic' was commonly used by the Islamists prior 
to the use of fundamentalism. Many Islamists do not object to the literal 
meaning of fundamentalism as it refers the believers to the fundamentals of the 
faith. Both previous and current generations of Islamic reformers are 
consistent in their calls upon Muslims to go back to the original sources of 
Islam.
Unlike the simple arguments or slogans of the first generation of reformers, 
the second generation further developed the 'authentic' arguments and adapted 
it to the needs of the 20th century. The contemporary Islamic call seeks to 
bring the life of Muslims in line with the norms of the historical texts and 
traditions, while at the same time, attempting to reconcile their reading of 
the the Islamic text with the context of modernity. They attempted a discourse 
which accommodated the traditional concepts on public life through a modern 
interpretative framework. They offered Islamic views, proposals and 
alternatives to the problems of the modern world based on the following 
principles:
1- to go back to the original sources or the fundamental meanings of Islam and 
to get rid of the impurities of other sources.
2-to benefit from modern sciences and widen the horizons of the Muslim mind.
3- to revive the process of 'Ijitehad' and tackle contemporary issues which had 
no previous precedence in Muslim traditions.
The authentic review of the Islamic discourse based on the above procedures 
went beyond the simple reaction of the first generation of reformers. 
Consequently, it inspired a generation of thinkers, writers and activists who 
further developed the dimensions of the Islamic discourse. By the second half 
of the 20th century, the failure of secular programmes and national governments 
became obvious and the out of dated traditional religious schools conceded to 
the authentic Islamic movements as the only viable Islamic alternative to 
contemporary rival ideologies. However, the chaos in Algeria and Afghanistan, 
the limited achievements in Iran, Pakistan and Sudan, the failure of Islamic 
movements in many Muslim countries and the experiences of the Islamists in 
Malaysia, Turkey and Jordan are creating new conditions that are pushing the 
Islamists towards another phase of reform. But by the end of this century, it 
will be obvious that the discourse of the second generation of Muslim
 reformers is no longer sufficient to address the needs of the forthcoming 
generations of Muslims. Now there is a need to move from the authentic attempts 
to reconcile the conflicting trends of the past and present, to that of 
reproducing an authentic modern discourse.

The Need for further Authentic Update
The most urgent problem facing, the Muslims, is neither political nor 
economical, but a crisis of our thinking and learning process in relation to 
ourselves, Islam, Muslims and humanity at large. A critical review to the 
external conditions, symptoms or causes of the contemporary decline is of 
little practical value unless it is preceded with a serious self review and 
re-assessment. It is clear that the cultural environment plays a critical role 
in shaping the consciousness and in developing the characters of people. 
Subconsciously, it feeds the mind with assumptions, ready-made thought patterns 
and norms. Conditions orientate the emotions, influence people and shape their 
development. As a rule, people do not reflect deeply on the conditions or 
underlying assumptions of their beliefs, but many do so following a crisis, an 
overwhelming challenge or a serious exposure to external influences. 

saiyed shahbazi
  www.shahbazcenter.org

Reply via email to