[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-904) Remove cyclic dependencies from artemis-cli
Bennet Schulz created ARTEMIS-904: - Summary: Remove cyclic dependencies from artemis-cli Key: ARTEMIS-904 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-904 Project: ActiveMQ Artemis Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bennet Schulz The project needs some smaller refactorings. Some methods should be moved to another class which is responsible it (e.g. printBanner() in Artemis class should be moved to PrintData class. In addition to this simple case there are lots of other classes/packages which have cyclic dependencies. I already did such a refactoring for artemis-jdbc. (ARTEMIS-830 Remove cyclic dependencies from artemis-jdbc-store) We should track all our dependencies between classes and packages as the Spring guys do since quite a while -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-903) Add documentation for updating Artemis to newer versions
Bennet Schulz created ARTEMIS-903: - Summary: Add documentation for updating Artemis to newer versions Key: ARTEMIS-903 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-903 Project: ActiveMQ Artemis Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bennet Schulz Currently there is no documentation about how to update Artemis in the standard documentation. Clebert explained it a bit in his video on his blog and I wrote a blogpost about it recently. We think it should be part of the standard documentation of Artemis. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Resolved] (ARTEMIS-735) Refactoring of JUnit Tests in artemis-rest
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz resolved ARTEMIS-735. --- Resolution: Fixed > Refactoring of JUnit Tests in artemis-rest > -- > > Key: ARTEMIS-735 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-735 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Bennet Schulz > > It should be easier to understand what the respective test does and which > behaviour is expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-830) Remove cyclic dependencies between packages/classes in artemis-jdbc-store
Bennet Schulz created ARTEMIS-830: - Summary: Remove cyclic dependencies between packages/classes in artemis-jdbc-store Key: ARTEMIS-830 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-830 Project: ActiveMQ Artemis Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bennet Schulz Currently there are lots of dependencies between classes and packages in artemis-jdbc-store. These cyclic dependencies should be solved and the codebase should be free from tangles to keep it maintainable. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-735) Refactoring of JUnit Tests
Bennet Schulz created ARTEMIS-735: - Summary: Refactoring of JUnit Tests Key: ARTEMIS-735 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-735 Project: ActiveMQ Artemis Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bennet Schulz It should be easier to understand what the respective test does and which behaviour is expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (ARTEMIS-735) Refactoring of JUnit Tests in artemis-rest
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz updated ARTEMIS-735: -- Summary: Refactoring of JUnit Tests in artemis-rest (was: Refactoring of JUnit Tests) > Refactoring of JUnit Tests in artemis-rest > -- > > Key: ARTEMIS-735 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-735 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Bennet Schulz > > It should be easier to understand what the respective test does and which > behaviour is expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Closed] (ARTEMIS-680) Just some refactorings in Vert.X integration and corresponding Test
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz closed ARTEMIS-680. - pull request has been merged on Aug 14th (https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/4ae18782da9bcd1277dda29e07aae5001fe43f03) > Just some refactorings in Vert.X integration and corresponding Test > --- > > Key: ARTEMIS-680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-680 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Bennet Schulz > > Hi guys, > I just made some simple refactorings in the vertx integration of artemis. > Here's the link to my open pull request: > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/718 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Resolved] (ARTEMIS-680) Just some refactorings in Vert.X integration and corresponding Test
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz resolved ARTEMIS-680. --- Resolution: Fixed > Just some refactorings in Vert.X integration and corresponding Test > --- > > Key: ARTEMIS-680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-680 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Bennet Schulz > > Hi guys, > I just made some simple refactorings in the vertx integration of artemis. > Here's the link to my open pull request: > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/718 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-680) Just some refactorings in Vert.X integration and corresponding Test
Bennet Schulz created ARTEMIS-680: - Summary: Just some refactorings in Vert.X integration and corresponding Test Key: ARTEMIS-680 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-680 Project: ActiveMQ Artemis Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bennet Schulz Hi guys, I just made some simple refactorings in the vertx integration of artemis. Here's the link to my open pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/718 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Closed] (AMQ-6348) More detailed documentation about Message Level Security
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz closed AMQ-6348. -- > More detailed documentation about Message Level Security > > > Key: AMQ-6348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Reporter: Bennet Schulz >Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > Hi guys, > in my opinion, the documentation for Message Level Security > (http://activemq.apache.org/security.html) is not detailed enough. People who > need that kind of security have to read additional sources to implement it. > I would like to contribute to ActiveMQ and would fix it if you want. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Resolved] (AMQ-6348) More detailed documentation about Message Level Security
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz resolved AMQ-6348. Resolution: Fixed updated the documentation > More detailed documentation about Message Level Security > > > Key: AMQ-6348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Reporter: Bennet Schulz >Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > Hi guys, > in my opinion, the documentation for Message Level Security > (http://activemq.apache.org/security.html) is not detailed enough. People who > need that kind of security have to read additional sources to implement it. > I would like to contribute to ActiveMQ and would fix it if you want. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6348) More detailed documentation about Message Level Security
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15374433#comment-15374433 ] Bennet Schulz commented on AMQ-6348: Thanks! You can close it. > More detailed documentation about Message Level Security > > > Key: AMQ-6348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Reporter: Bennet Schulz >Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > Hi guys, > in my opinion, the documentation for Message Level Security > (http://activemq.apache.org/security.html) is not detailed enough. People who > need that kind of security have to read additional sources to implement it. > I would like to contribute to ActiveMQ and would fix it if you want. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Resolved] (AMQ-6349) Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bennet Schulz resolved AMQ-6349. Resolution: Fixed changed the web console screenshot to a new one without release. > Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers > > > Key: AMQ-6349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Reporter: Bennet Schulz >Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 0.25h > Remaining Estimate: 0.25h > > The Web Console page contains a screenshot with an outdated version of > ActiveMQ. In my opinion it would be better to have a screenshot without > release numbers, because we wouldn't need to update each screenshot after a > release and readers wouldn't get the impression that the documentation is > completely outdated. > Here is the link to the web console page: > http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6349) Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15370775#comment-15370775 ] Bennet Schulz commented on AMQ-6349: done. > Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers > > > Key: AMQ-6349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Reporter: Bennet Schulz >Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 0.25h > Remaining Estimate: 0.25h > > The Web Console page contains a screenshot with an outdated version of > ActiveMQ. In my opinion it would be better to have a screenshot without > release numbers, because we wouldn't need to update each screenshot after a > release and readers wouldn't get the impression that the documentation is > completely outdated. > Here is the link to the web console page: > http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6349) Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15370685#comment-15370685 ] Bennet Schulz commented on AMQ-6349: I already have an edited version of the web console on my desktop. Is there a way to upload it? > Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers > > > Key: AMQ-6349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Reporter: Bennet Schulz >Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 0.25h > Remaining Estimate: 0.25h > > The Web Console page contains a screenshot with an outdated version of > ActiveMQ. In my opinion it would be better to have a screenshot without > release numbers, because we wouldn't need to update each screenshot after a > release and readers wouldn't get the impression that the documentation is > completely outdated. > Here is the link to the web console page: > http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (AMQ-6349) Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers
Bennet Schulz created AMQ-6349: -- Summary: Web Console screenshots without outdated release numbers Key: AMQ-6349 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6349 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Improvement Components: Documentation Reporter: Bennet Schulz Priority: Trivial The Web Console page contains a screenshot with an outdated version of ActiveMQ. In my opinion it would be better to have a screenshot without release numbers, because we wouldn't need to update each screenshot after a release and readers wouldn't get the impression that the documentation is completely outdated. Here is the link to the web console page: http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (AMQ-6348) More detailed documentation about Message Level Security
Bennet Schulz created AMQ-6348: -- Summary: More detailed documentation about Message Level Security Key: AMQ-6348 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6348 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Improvement Components: Documentation Reporter: Bennet Schulz Priority: Trivial Hi guys, in my opinion, the documentation for Message Level Security (http://activemq.apache.org/security.html) is not detailed enough. People who need that kind of security have to read additional sources to implement it. I would like to contribute to ActiveMQ and would fix it if you want. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)