[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-4533) Move the examples to their own repository

2024-01-30 Thread Mike Lothian (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17812366#comment-17812366
 ] 

Mike Lothian commented on ARTEMIS-4533:
---

Ah no worries, I get notified when the tag appears in github, it was only when 
I investigated why the rar's failed that I figured out what happened

> Move the examples to their own repository
> -
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-4533
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4533
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.32.0
>
>  Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As previously discussed 
> ([here|https://lists.apache.org/thread/jq783v0ywpgsnty6fw0n2nmxogjh935p]) the 
> examples will be moved to their own independent repository rather than being 
> part of the main Artemis repository and build.
> The new examples repository will be: 
> [https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/]
> The examples repo _main_ branch will target the current Artemis release, with 
> changes toward/requiring the next release occurring on the _development_ 
> branch prior to the Artemis release happening.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-4533) Move the examples to their own repository

2024-01-30 Thread Mike Lothian (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17812323#comment-17812323
 ] 

Mike Lothian commented on ARTEMIS-4533:
---

Hi, I normally build artemis-ra-rar & artemis-jakarta-ra-rar when building 
ArtemisMQ, I can see they've been moved into the new repo but there's no 2.32.0 
tag yet

> Move the examples to their own repository
> -
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-4533
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4533
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.32.0
>
>  Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As previously discussed 
> ([here|https://lists.apache.org/thread/jq783v0ywpgsnty6fw0n2nmxogjh935p]) the 
> examples will be moved to their own independent repository rather than being 
> part of the main Artemis repository and build.
> The new examples repository will be: 
> [https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/]
> The examples repo _main_ branch will target the current Artemis release, with 
> changes toward/requiring the next release occurring on the _development_ 
> branch prior to the Artemis release happening.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-9413) WebSite / AMQ6 confusion

2023-12-11 Thread Mike Lothian (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17795420#comment-17795420
 ] 

Mike Lothian commented on AMQ-9413:
---

Thanks for clarifying and I'll direct any future questions to the correct place

> WebSite / AMQ6 confusion
> 
>
> Key: AMQ-9413
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9413
> Project: ActiveMQ
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: website
>Affects Versions: 6.0.0, 6.0.1
>Reporter: Mike Lothian
>Priority: Minor
>
> Is ActiveMQ 6 now the previous ArtemisMQ code?
> If so does that mean Artemis is no longer being developed? Or is it just the 
> next set of feature work
> activemq.apache.org doesn't really make this clear and I think is still using 
> the wording from pre-6
> This section in particular:
> {quote}There are currently two "flavors" of ActiveMQ available - the 
> well-known "classic" broker and the "next generation" broker code-named 
> {_}Artemis{_}. Once Artemis reaches a sufficient level of feature parity with 
> the "Classic" code-base it will become the next major version of ActiveMQ. 
> Initial [migration 
> documentation|https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/migration] is 
> available as well as a development 
> [roadmap|https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-artemis-roadmap] for Artemis.
> {quote}
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Created] (AMQ-9413) WebSite / AMQ6 confusion

2023-12-11 Thread Mike Lothian (Jira)
Mike Lothian created AMQ-9413:
-

 Summary: WebSite / AMQ6 confusion
 Key: AMQ-9413
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9413
 Project: ActiveMQ
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: website
Affects Versions: 6.0.1, 6.0.0
Reporter: Mike Lothian


Is ActiveMQ 6 now the previous ArtemisMQ code?

If so does that mean Artemis is no longer being developed? Or is it just the 
next set of feature work

activemq.apache.org doesn't really make this clear and I think is still using 
the wording from pre-6

This section in particular:
{quote}There are currently two "flavors" of ActiveMQ available - the well-known 
"classic" broker and the "next generation" broker code-named {_}Artemis{_}. 
Once Artemis reaches a sufficient level of feature parity with the "Classic" 
code-base it will become the next major version of ActiveMQ. Initial [migration 
documentation|https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/migration] is 
available as well as a development 
[roadmap|https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-artemis-roadmap] for Artemis.
{quote}
 

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)