[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17075227#comment-17075227 ] Krisztian Szucs commented on ARROW-2910: Still valid, it would be nice to use the official source tarball but the scripts are currently wired to use the repository. > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 7.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17075203#comment-17075203 ] Neal Richardson commented on ARROW-2910: Still valid? > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 7.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16781745#comment-16781745 ] Krisztian Szucs commented on ARROW-2910: [~wesmckinn] I don't think We'll have time to address this, suggest to move it to 0.14 > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Time Spent: 7.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16692187#comment-16692187 ] Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2910: - Seems we may not be ready for this in 0.12. Moving to 0.13 > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Time Spent: 7h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16604153#comment-16604153 ] Krisztian Szucs commented on ARROW-2910: No, I meant just a crossbow package within arrow. My real question was about delaying this issue after crossbow has its own package and test suite. > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 0.11.0 > > Time Spent: 7h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16603309#comment-16603309 ] Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2910: - What does "a separate module" mean, another git repo? What are the benefits of doing that? If we decide to do that (if it is deemed a good idea), as long as we keep the development "inside the community" (i.e. we would create something like apache/arrow-crossbow) then it is OK with me > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 0.11.0 > > Time Spent: 7h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-2910) [Packaging] Build from official apache archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16602998#comment-16602998 ] Krisztian Szucs commented on ARROW-2910: [~wesmckinn] This PR introduces a lot of duplications, bash and batch scripts inside the CI templates. I'd favor to move crossbow to a separate module, bootstrap crossbow at the beginning of each build and implement the download+verification step in the python module instead (with tests). Until that We could continue to build from git, the nightly builds are kinda stable [https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=nightly] What do You think? > [Packaging] Build from official apache archive > -- > > Key: ARROW-2910 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2910 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Task > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Krisztian Szucs >Assignee: Krisztian Szucs >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 0.11.0 > > Time Spent: 7h 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
