[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-8244) LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has hard coded agent class

2015-02-11 Thread Marcus Sorensen (JIRA)
Marcus Sorensen created CLOUDSTACK-8244:
---

 Summary: LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has hard coded agent class
 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8244
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8244
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
Affects Versions: 4.3.0
Reporter: Marcus Sorensen
 Fix For: 4.5.0


LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has a hard-coded string-based reference to 
LibvirtComputingResource:

String guidWithTail = guid + -LibvirtComputingResource;

However, this class is configurable in the agent via agent.properties, and this 
breaks the configurability. This needs to be reworked ideally to discover 
agents regardless of what the suffix of the guid is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-8243) LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has hard coded agent class

2015-02-11 Thread Marcus Sorensen (JIRA)
Marcus Sorensen created CLOUDSTACK-8243:
---

 Summary: LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has hard coded agent class
 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8243
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8243
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
Affects Versions: 4.3.0
Reporter: Marcus Sorensen
 Fix For: 4.5.0


LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has a hard-coded string-based reference to 
LibvirtComputingResource:

String guidWithTail = guid + -LibvirtComputingResource;

However, this class is configurable in the agent via agent.properties, and this 
breaks the configurability. This needs to be reworked ideally to discover 
agents regardless of what the suffix of the guid is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-8244) LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has hard coded agent class

2015-02-11 Thread Marcus Sorensen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcus Sorensen closed CLOUDSTACK-8244.
---
Resolution: Duplicate

 LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has hard coded agent class
 ---

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8244
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8244
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
Affects Versions: 4.3.0
Reporter: Marcus Sorensen
 Fix For: 4.5.0


 LibvirtServerDiscoverer.java has a hard-coded string-based reference to 
 LibvirtComputingResource:
 String guidWithTail = guid + -LibvirtComputingResource;
 However, this class is configurable in the agent via agent.properties, and 
 this breaks the configurability. This needs to be reworked ideally to 
 discover agents regardless of what the suffix of the guid is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8227) Creating VDI support tool for cloudstack

2015-02-11 Thread Tilak Raj Singh (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14317154#comment-14317154
 ] 

Tilak Raj Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-8227:
-

HI Rajesh,

I just sent a mail on us...@cloudstack.apache.org and cced your email id 
rajesh.batt...@citrix.com. I have explained my whole current setup there and 
the improvements I would like to add into it. Please have a look at it and let 
me know your feedback on the same.
Also if you want to have a look at the current system let's discuss some time 
and I can show you the whole setup via team viewer.

Regards

 Creating VDI support tool for cloudstack
 

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8227
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8227
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
Reporter: Tilak Raj Singh
  Labels: cloud, gsoc2015, java

 I wish to create a VDI support tool for cloudstack so that DesktopAsAService 
 can be provided using Cloudstack. I wish to use Guacamole Web Service 
 (http://guac-dev.org/) for the purpose which is based on VNC to do the same



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8227) Creating VDI support tool for cloudstack

2015-02-11 Thread Rajesh Battala (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14317504#comment-14317504
 ] 

Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-8227:


Great. 
I will go through it and let you know.

Thanks
Rajesh Battala



 Creating VDI support tool for cloudstack
 

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8227
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8227
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
Reporter: Tilak Raj Singh
  Labels: cloud, gsoc2015, java

 I wish to create a VDI support tool for cloudstack so that DesktopAsAService 
 can be provided using Cloudstack. I wish to use Guacamole Web Service 
 (http://guac-dev.org/) for the purpose which is based on VNC to do the same



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-8245) Scrolling down the network service providers list from the UI never ends

2015-02-11 Thread Ramamurti Subramanian (JIRA)
Ramamurti Subramanian created CLOUDSTACK-8245:
-

 Summary: Scrolling down the network service providers list from 
the UI never ends
 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8245
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8245
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
  Components: UI
Reporter: Ramamurti Subramanian
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 4.6.0






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8104) Add TRIM/Discard support to Qemu

2015-02-11 Thread Wido den Hollander (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14315892#comment-14315892
 ] 

Wido den Hollander commented on CLOUDSTACK-8104:


Without virtio-scsi we can't implement trim/discard

 Add TRIM/Discard support to Qemu
 

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8104
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8104
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
  Components: KVM
Reporter: Wido den Hollander
Assignee: Wido den Hollander
Priority: Minor

 Thinly provisioned volumes on storage devices continue to grow because the 
 storage device has no idea of which blocks are in use.
 For SSDs the TRIM/Discard feature was invented to give free/unused blocks 
 back to the flash device, but this can also be used for Qemu.
 Ceph's RBD for example supports trimming so that volumes can shrink again 
 when blocks are no longer in use.
 This is supported since Qemu 1.5, but since 1.6 it also works for QCOW2 
 images.
 It however requires the new virtio-scsi to work optimal, so it requires some 
 changes.
 For more information see:
 * http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/1.5#Block_devices
 * http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/1.6#Block_devices
 * http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/qemu-rbd/#enabling-discard-trim
 * http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/VirtioSCSI



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-8239) Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors

2015-02-11 Thread Wido den Hollander (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Wido den Hollander reassigned CLOUDSTACK-8239:
--

Assignee: Wido den Hollander

 Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors
 ---

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8239
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
  Components: KVM, Storage Controller
Affects Versions: 4.6.0
 Environment: KVM
Reporter: Andrei Mikhailovsky
Assignee: Wido den Hollander
Priority: Critical
  Labels: ceph, kvm, rbd, storage_drivers, virtio

 It would be nice to have support for virtio-scsi for KVM hypervisors.
 The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing 
 the number of devices you can attach to a vm, have ability to use discard and 
 reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. There are also 
 talks about having a greater performance advantage as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8239) Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors

2015-02-11 Thread Wido den Hollander (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14315895#comment-14315895
 ] 

Wido den Hollander commented on CLOUDSTACK-8239:


All new Linux versions support virtio-scsi, so I think we can safely switch to 
virtio-scsi for all new Linux Instances.

Quick check is that Ubuntu 14.04 and CentOS 7 both support it. So it shouldn't 
be a big problem to change their XML defitinitions and choose VirtIO-SCSI for 
those guests.

 Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors
 ---

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8239
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
  Components: KVM, Storage Controller
Affects Versions: 4.6.0
 Environment: KVM
Reporter: Andrei Mikhailovsky
Assignee: Wido den Hollander
Priority: Critical
  Labels: ceph, kvm, rbd, storage_drivers, virtio

 It would be nice to have support for virtio-scsi for KVM hypervisors.
 The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing 
 the number of devices you can attach to a vm, have ability to use discard and 
 reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. There are also 
 talks about having a greater performance advantage as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8227) Creating VDI support tool for cloudstack

2015-02-11 Thread Rajesh Battala (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14316033#comment-14316033
 ] 

Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-8227:


Hi Tilak.
We can discuss over mailing listing. we can see your initial setup and what's 
your plan.

Thank
Rajesh Battala

 Creating VDI support tool for cloudstack
 

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8227
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8227
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
Reporter: Tilak Raj Singh
  Labels: cloud, gsoc2015, java

 I wish to create a VDI support tool for cloudstack so that DesktopAsAService 
 can be provided using Cloudstack. I wish to use Guacamole Web Service 
 (http://guac-dev.org/) for the purpose which is based on VNC to do the same



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8241) Moving the uplaod_volume dict to configurableData section so that volume upload URL can be changed according to the setup

2015-02-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14316069#comment-14316069
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-8241:
-

Commit af09388eda491a529e88ed62fb2c3d62fe554a4d in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~gauravaradhye]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=af09388 ]

CLOUDSTACK-8241: Moved upload volume dict data to configurableData section of 
the test_data.py file so that data can be changed according to the setup, also 
made relevant changes in the test cases

Signed-off-by: Srikanteswararao tall...@apache.org


 Moving the uplaod_volume dict to configurableData section so that volume 
 upload URL can be changed according to the setup
 -

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8241
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8241
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: Test
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
  Components: Automation
Affects Versions: 4.5.0
Reporter: Gaurav Aradhye
Assignee: Gaurav Aradhye
  Labels: automation
 Fix For: 4.5.0


 The volume upload URL is hard coded right now and should be moved to 
 configurableData section so that appropriate data can be filled before the 
 running the relevant test cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8240) component.test_vmware_drs.TestVMPlacement.test_vm_creation_in_fully_automated_mode - Skip the test case because it is not possible to check the scenario through au

2015-02-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14316082#comment-14316082
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-8240:
-

Commit ec1c3894f0a2cfdd9b9b96e4e01b6e8bba77af0f in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~gauravaradhye]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ec1c389 ]

CLOUDSTACK-8240: Skipping test case in test_vmware_drs.py because the scenario 
is not testable through automation

Signed-off-by: Srikanteswararao Talluri tall...@apache.org


 component.test_vmware_drs.TestVMPlacement.test_vm_creation_in_fully_automated_mode
  - Skip the test case because it is not possible to check the scenario 
 through automation
 ---

 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8240
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8240
 Project: CloudStack
  Issue Type: Test
  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
 default.) 
  Components: Automation
Affects Versions: 4.5.0
Reporter: Gaurav Aradhye
Assignee: Gaurav Aradhye
  Labels: automation
 Fix For: 4.5.0


 The test case fails because Vm is being deployed with memory so high (just 
 below the host capacity) that such high amount of memory can't be specified 
 in service offering.
 The scenario is not testable, hence test case should be skipped.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)