[jira] [Commented] (DBUTILS-92) Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects

2012-07-09 Thread Joerg Schaible (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13409385#comment-13409385
 ] 

Joerg Schaible commented on DBUTILS-92:
---

A relocation POM is wrong in any case. If DBUTILS 2.0 will be binary 
compatible, groupId and artifactId will not change. If it is incompatible, it 
will also change the package name and both artifacts are meant to be used at 
the same time.

 Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects
 

 Key: DBUTILS-92
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92
 Project: Commons DbUtils
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Stevo Slavic
 Attachments: DBUTILS-92.patch, DBUTILS-92.patch, DBUTILS-92.patch, 
 pom.xml, pom.xml


 It seems to be the trend (maybe there's even some convention/agreement among 
 Apache Commons developers) that with new releases Apache Commons projects use 
 org.apache.commons as Maven artifact groupId. Please consider aligning 
 commons-dbutils Maven artifacts groupId with this practice. If decided to use 
 org.apache.commons groupId, for the first release with new groupId also 
 consider publishing relocation pom file too with old groupId (see 
 [this|http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html#Releasing_the_next_version]
  for more info).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (DBUTILS-92) Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects

2012-07-09 Thread Stevo Slavic (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13409451#comment-13409451
 ] 

Stevo Slavic commented on DBUTILS-92:
-

Agreed, skip publishing relocation pom then.

 Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects
 

 Key: DBUTILS-92
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92
 Project: Commons DbUtils
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Stevo Slavic
 Attachments: DBUTILS-92.patch, DBUTILS-92.patch, DBUTILS-92.patch, 
 pom.xml, pom.xml


 It seems to be the trend (maybe there's even some convention/agreement among 
 Apache Commons developers) that with new releases Apache Commons projects use 
 org.apache.commons as Maven artifact groupId. Please consider aligning 
 commons-dbutils Maven artifacts groupId with this practice. If decided to use 
 org.apache.commons groupId, for the first release with new groupId also 
 consider publishing relocation pom file too with old groupId (see 
 [this|http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html#Releasing_the_next_version]
  for more info).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (DBUTILS-92) Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects

2012-07-08 Thread Sebb (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13408913#comment-13408913
 ] 

Sebb commented on DBUTILS-92:
-

Unfortunately relocation poms don't work properly (they are not guaranteed to 
be used), so changing the Maven coords may result in jar hell unless we also 
change the package name.

 Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects
 

 Key: DBUTILS-92
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92
 Project: Commons DbUtils
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Stevo Slavic
 Attachments: DBUTILS-92.patch, pom.xml


 It seems to be the trend (maybe there's even some convention/agreement among 
 Apache Commons developers) that with new releases Apache Commons projects use 
 org.apache.commons as Maven artifact groupId. Please consider aligning 
 commons-dbutils Maven artifacts groupId with this practice. If decided to use 
 org.apache.commons groupId, for the first release with new groupId also 
 consider publishing relocation pom file too with old groupId (see 
 [this|http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html#Releasing_the_next_version]
  for more info).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (DBUTILS-92) Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects

2012-07-08 Thread Stevo Slavic (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13408963#comment-13408963
 ] 

Stevo Slavic commented on DBUTILS-92:
-

Oh, right, that's why commons-lang and similar have added numbers to the 
package names in relocated releases.
I think though, unlike commons-lang, that it's much less likely that one would 
use one variant of dbutils directly and get the other one transitively.
Nevertheless, to stay on the safe side, probably better to follow the pattern 
and include in coordinates change also package change, and do that in a major 
(2.0) release.

 Align maven groupId with rest of the apache commons projects
 

 Key: DBUTILS-92
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92
 Project: Commons DbUtils
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Stevo Slavic
 Attachments: DBUTILS-92.patch, pom.xml


 It seems to be the trend (maybe there's even some convention/agreement among 
 Apache Commons developers) that with new releases Apache Commons projects use 
 org.apache.commons as Maven artifact groupId. Please consider aligning 
 commons-dbutils Maven artifacts groupId with this practice. If decided to use 
 org.apache.commons groupId, for the first release with new groupId also 
 consider publishing relocation pom file too with old groupId (see 
 [this|http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html#Releasing_the_next_version]
  for more info).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira