[GitHub] [flink] shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: [FLINK-19770][python][test] Changed the PythonProgramOptionTest to be an ITCase.
shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13756#issuecomment-717898835 @flinkbot run azure This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: [FLINK-19770][python][test] Changed the PythonProgramOptionTest to be an ITCase.
shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13756#issuecomment-717730700 @anonymouscodeholic Thank you for pointing out the mistake, I have revised them in the latest commit. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: [FLINK-19770][python][test] Changed the PythonProgramOptionTest to be an ITCase.
shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13756#issuecomment-717661702 Hi @anonymouscodeholic , I have updated the pr according to your suggestions, please have a look at it. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: [FLINK-19770][python][test] Changed the PythonProgramOptionTest to be an ITCase.
shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13756#issuecomment-715012391 @anonymouscodeholic Sorry, I will add more comments for this test case to make it more intuitive. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [flink] shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: [FLINK-19770][python][test] Changed the PythonProgramOptionTest to be an ITCase.
shuiqiangchen commented on pull request #13756: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13756#issuecomment-714980749 @anonymouscodeholic Thank you for your suggestions. Exactly, there is only the `testConfigurePythonExecution` need to be run as an IT. It would be better to split the tests in PythonProgramOptionsTest into two class (UTs and ITs) since UT has lower cost. >After this PR it's not clear why does this test need to be an IT. The reason is that it requires to set a job jar to build a `PackagedProgram`, and the dummy job jar used in this test case is built in the packing phase. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org