[GitHub] flink issue #2920: [FLINK-5218] [state backends] Eagerly close checkpoint st...
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2920 Manually merged in cc006ff18cc7032de3be3fdd9ef7ad383e88bba0 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] flink issue #2920: [FLINK-5218] [state backends] Eagerly close checkpoint st...
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2920 Thanks for the review, merging this... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] flink issue #2920: [FLINK-5218] [state backends] Eagerly close checkpoint st...
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2920 I think the changed semantics makes actually more sense. It should also be fine for all callers, as returning null to them was also previously possible and IRC there should be no special meaning to an empty handle in 1.1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] flink issue #2920: [FLINK-5218] [state backends] Eagerly close checkpoint st...
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2920 @StefanRRichter There is one change of semantics that would be good to get your input on: A checkpoint stream to which a `byte[0]` array was written is now actually empty and returns a `null` state handle in the same way as if nothing was ever written. Before this change, it would have created a state of zero bytes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
