[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

jingzhang closed FLINK-6067.
----------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> DataSetCalc which contains filterCondition and projects would not be choose 
> as best path in Batch TableAPI/SQL
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6067
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: jingzhang
>            Assignee: jingzhang
>
> {code}
>         val result = table.where('a < 60).select('a * 1.2,  'b / 2, 'c)
> {code}
> we run the above code in the Batch TableAPI/SQL, we would get the following 
> optimizedPlan
> {code}
> DataSetCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c])
>   DataSetCalc(select=[a, b, c], where=[<(a, 60)])
>     DataSetScan(table=[[_DataSetTable_0]])
> {code}
> However, we run the above code in the Stream TableAPI/SQL, we would get the 
> following optimizedPlan
> {code}
> DataStreamCalc(select=[*(a, 1.2E0) AS _c0, /(b, 2) AS _c1, c], where=[<(a, 
> 60)])
>   DataStreamScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_0]])
> {code}
> we can find that in the batch tableAPI/SQL, DataSetCalc which contains 
> filterCondition and projects would not be choose as best path.
> The reason is:
> The cumulative cost of topNode of path DataSetCalc->DataSetCalc->DataSetScan 
> is DataSetCost{2001.0 rows, 2004.0 cpu, 0.0 io}
> The cumulative cost of topNode of  path DataSetCalc->DataSetScan is 
> DataSetCost{2000.0 rows, 6000.0 cpu, 0.0 io}
> based on isLe method of DataSetCost, compare io first, then cpu, then rows, 
> So DataSetCalc->DataSetCalc->DataSetScan is choose as best path.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to