[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6576) Allow ConfigOptions to validate the configured value
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16017507#comment-16017507 ] Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-6576: - [~greghogan] wrong issue? :) Think you're looking for FLINK-6628. > Allow ConfigOptions to validate the configured value > > > Key: FLINK-6576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6576 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Wish > Components: Configuration >Reporter: Chesnay Schepler >Priority: Trivial > > It is not unusual for a config parameter to only accept certain values. Ports > may not be negative, modes way essentially be enums, and file paths must not > be gibberish. > Currently these validations happen manually after the value was extracted > from the {{Configuration}}. > I want to start a discussion on whether we want to move this validation into > the ConfigOption itself. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6576) Allow ConfigOptions to validate the configured value
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16017493#comment-16017493 ] Greg Hogan commented on FLINK-6576: --- I happend to also look at this and in addition to {{taskmanager.sh}} the {{flink-daemon.sh}} log rotation needs escaping: {{rotateLogFilesWithPrefix "$FLINK_LOG_DIR" "$FLINK_LOG_PREFIX"}}. > Allow ConfigOptions to validate the configured value > > > Key: FLINK-6576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6576 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Wish > Components: Configuration >Reporter: Chesnay Schepler >Priority: Trivial > > It is not unusual for a config parameter to only accept certain values. Ports > may not be negative, modes way essentially be enums, and file paths must not > be gibberish. > Currently these validations happen manually after the value was extracted > from the {{Configuration}}. > I want to start a discussion on whether we want to move this validation into > the ConfigOption itself. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)