[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6874) Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059060#comment-16059060 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6874: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4091 > Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs > - > > Key: FLINK-6874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6874 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Affects Versions: 1.4.0 >Reporter: Greg Hogan >Assignee: Greg Hogan >Priority: Trivial > > Update {{dev/types_serialization.html}} to note that static and transient > fields are ignored when validating a POJO ({{TypeExtractor#analyzePojo}} > calls {{#getAllDeclaredFields}} which ignores transient and static fields). > "All fields in the class (and all superclasses) are either public (and > non-final) or have a public getter- and a setter- method that follows the > Java beans naming conventions for getters and setters." -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6874) Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16056924#comment-16056924 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6874: --- Github user tzulitai commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4091 Thanks for the PR @greghogan. LGTM! Will merge this .. > Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs > - > > Key: FLINK-6874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6874 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Affects Versions: 1.4.0 >Reporter: Greg Hogan >Assignee: Greg Hogan >Priority: Trivial > > Update {{dev/types_serialization.html}} to note that static and transient > fields are ignored when validating a POJO ({{TypeExtractor#analyzePojo}} > calls {{#getAllDeclaredFields}} which ignores transient and static fields). > "All fields in the class (and all superclasses) are either public (and > non-final) or have a public getter- and a setter- method that follows the > Java beans naming conventions for getters and setters." -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6874) Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16042803#comment-16042803 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6874: --- GitHub user greghogan opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4091 [FLINK-6874] [docs] Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs Note that static and transient fields are ignored when TypeExtrator validates a POJO. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/greghogan/flink 6874_static_and_transient_fields_ignored_for_pojos Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4091.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #4091 commit 64c4669c6c937a4611076f5bfcc2f334f70ca46e Author: Greg HoganDate: 2017-06-08T14:51:49Z [FLINK-6874] [docs] Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs Note that static and transient fields are ignored when TypeExtrator validates a POJO. > Static and transient fields ignored for POJOs > - > > Key: FLINK-6874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6874 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation >Affects Versions: 1.4.0 >Reporter: Greg Hogan >Assignee: Greg Hogan >Priority: Trivial > > Update {{dev/types_serialization.html}} to note that static and transient > fields are ignored when validating a POJO ({{TypeExtractor#analyzePojo}} > calls {{#getAllDeclaredFields}} which ignores transient and static fields). > "All fields in the class (and all superclasses) are either public (and > non-final) or have a public getter- and a setter- method that follows the > Java beans naming conventions for getters and setters." -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)