[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-2437) TypeExtractor.analyzePojo has some problems around the default constructor detection

2015-08-12 Thread Maximilian Michels (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2437:
--
Affects Version/s: 0.9.0
   0.10

> TypeExtractor.analyzePojo has some problems around the default constructor 
> detection
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-2437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2437
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Type Serialization System
>Affects Versions: 0.10, 0.9.0
>Reporter: Gabor Gevay
>Assignee: Gabor Gevay
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.10, 0.9.1
>
>
> If a class does have a default constructor, but the user forgot to make it 
> public, then TypeExtractor.analyzePojo still thinks everything is OK, so it 
> creates a PojoTypeInfo. Then PojoSerializer.createInstance blows up.
> Furthermore, a "return null" seems to be missing from the then case of the if 
> after catching the NoSuchMethodException which would also cause a headache 
> for PojoSerializer.
> An additional minor issue is that the word "class" is printed twice in 
> several places, because class.toString also prepends it to the class name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-2437) TypeExtractor.analyzePojo has some problems around the default constructor detection

2015-08-12 Thread Maximilian Michels (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2437:
--
Fix Version/s: 0.9.1
   0.10

> TypeExtractor.analyzePojo has some problems around the default constructor 
> detection
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-2437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2437
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Type Serialization System
>Affects Versions: 0.10, 0.9.0
>Reporter: Gabor Gevay
>Assignee: Gabor Gevay
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.10, 0.9.1
>
>
> If a class does have a default constructor, but the user forgot to make it 
> public, then TypeExtractor.analyzePojo still thinks everything is OK, so it 
> creates a PojoTypeInfo. Then PojoSerializer.createInstance blows up.
> Furthermore, a "return null" seems to be missing from the then case of the if 
> after catching the NoSuchMethodException which would also cause a headache 
> for PojoSerializer.
> An additional minor issue is that the word "class" is printed twice in 
> several places, because class.toString also prepends it to the class name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)