[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
zhu.qing updated FLINK-8526:
Description: The next program attached will stuck at some special
parallelism in some situation. When parallelism is 80 in previous setting, The
program will always stuck. And when parallelism is 100, everything goes well.
According to my research I found when the parallelism equals to number of
taskslots. The program is not fastest and probably caused network buffer not
enough. How networker buffer related to parallelism and how parallelism relate
to running task (In other words we have 160 taskslots but running task can be
far more than taskslots). (was: The next program attached will stuck at some
special parallelism in some situation. When parallelism is 80 in previous
setting, The program will always stuck. And when parallelism is 100, everything
goes well. According to my research I found when the parallelism equals to
number of taskslots. The program is not fastest and probably caused network
buffer not enough. How networker buffer related to parallelism and how
parallelism relate to running task (In other words we have 160 taskslots but
running task can be far more than taskslots).)
> When use parallelism equals to half of the taskslot, join and shuffle
> operators will easly cause deadlock.
> --
>
> Key: FLINK-8526
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8526
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cluster Management, Java API, Local Runtime
>Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Environment: 8 machines(96GB and 24 cores) and 20 taskslot per
> taskmanager. twitter-2010 dataset. And parallelism setting to 80. I run my
> code in standalone mode.
>Reporter: zhu.qing
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: T2AdjActiveV.java, T2AdjMessage.java
>
> Original Estimate: 72h
> Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> The next program attached will stuck at some special parallelism in some
> situation. When parallelism is 80 in previous setting, The program will
> always stuck. And when parallelism is 100, everything goes well. According
> to my research I found when the parallelism equals to number of taskslots.
> The program is not fastest and probably caused network buffer not enough. How
> networker buffer related to parallelism and how parallelism relate to
> running task (In other words we have 160 taskslots but running task can be
> far more than taskslots).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)