[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10400) Function execution triggering internal exception

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787318#comment-17787318
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10400:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/982#issuecomment-1816770813

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> Function execution triggering internal exception
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a cluster with at least 3 members
> *AND* a partitioned region with 1 redundant-copy
> *AND* a server function called *JustAFunction* with isHA=false, 
> hasResult=true, optimizeForWrite=true
> *AND* a native client configured to connect to the above cluster with a pool 
> using PR-Single-Hop=true
> *WHEN* *JustAFunction* is executed with onRegion and no filters
> *IF* the client has partial metadata due to the cluster starting up or a 
> rebalance occurring
> *THEN* and exception of type 
> *"org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException:
>  Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation"* is thrown by one of 
> the servers
> ---
> *Additional information.* Currently, in geode-native whenever the metadata 
> information is incomplete, and the user tries to execute the server function 
> with onRegion and no filters, a request of type 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION_SINGLE_HOP is sent to each node.
> But the issue is that bucket partition used by the client is incorrect, 
> leading consequently to the mentioned exception.
> *Potential solution.* The potential solution would be to detect that the 
> metadata is incomplete before actually executing the function and send a 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION request to one of the cluster nodes instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10400) Function execution triggering internal exception

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787317#comment-17787317
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10400:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #982: GEODE-10400: Fix metadata 
completion detection
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/982




> Function execution triggering internal exception
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a cluster with at least 3 members
> *AND* a partitioned region with 1 redundant-copy
> *AND* a server function called *JustAFunction* with isHA=false, 
> hasResult=true, optimizeForWrite=true
> *AND* a native client configured to connect to the above cluster with a pool 
> using PR-Single-Hop=true
> *WHEN* *JustAFunction* is executed with onRegion and no filters
> *IF* the client has partial metadata due to the cluster starting up or a 
> rebalance occurring
> *THEN* and exception of type 
> *"org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException:
>  Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation"* is thrown by one of 
> the servers
> ---
> *Additional information.* Currently, in geode-native whenever the metadata 
> information is incomplete, and the user tries to execute the server function 
> with onRegion and no filters, a request of type 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION_SINGLE_HOP is sent to each node.
> But the issue is that bucket partition used by the client is incorrect, 
> leading consequently to the mentioned exception.
> *Potential solution.* The potential solution would be to detect that the 
> metadata is incomplete before actually executing the function and send a 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION request to one of the cluster nodes instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10414) Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787319#comment-17787319
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10414:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #984: GEODE-10414: Implement 
Region::putIfAbsent method
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/984




> Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* have putIfAbsent region method implemented
> *SO THAT* I can atomically put entries only if they don't previously, exist 
> and also, to align it with the Java API.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10276) Refactor PDX (de)serialziation code to align it with Java client

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787312#comment-17787312
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10276:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/969#issuecomment-1816770033

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> Refactor PDX (de)serialziation code to align it with Java client
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10276
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Currently there are the following open issues regarding PDX (de)serialization:
>  * [GEODE-9968 - Fix deserialization for new fields in PdxSerializable 
> class|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9968]
>  * [GEODE-9753 - Coredump during PdxSerializable object 
> serialization|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9753]
>  * [GEODE-10220 - Coredump while initializing PdxType 
> remoteToLocal|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10220]
>  * [GEODE-10255 - PdxSerializable not working correctly for multiple versions 
> of the same class|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10255]
> Also, the implementation on this ticket ([GEODE-8212: Reduce connections to 
> server to get type id|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8212]) 
> poses some issues with PDX entries which fields are a permutation. Thing is 
> that PdxTypes which fields are a permutation might use the wrong offsets, 
> leading to a corrupt serialization. This is something that was not taken into 
> account at the time of getting this PR merged.
> So this ticket should be reverted and possibly an alternative solution 
> proposed.
> In order to tackle these issues, a code refactoring is needed to introduce 
> the following implementations:
>  * Single type of PdxWriter
>  * An implementation PdxReader that tracks unread data, and other that don't.
>  * An implementation for PdxInstances that guarantees that fields are 
> actually written in alphabetical order, independently of the writeFields call 
> order. This should tackle the issue described above regarding GEODE-8212.
>  * Also, it'd be ideal to make it so PDX code is cleaner and easier to 
> understand, though that's a complex matter, and also, subjective.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10396) IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint disconnection

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787316#comment-17787316
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10396:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/977#issuecomment-1816770656

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint 
> disconnection
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* A cluster of 3 servers and a client with a pool pointing to those 3 
> servers
>*AND* configured with PR-Singl-Hop = true
> *WHEN* A server function is executed with onRegion and with a filter
>*AND* it throws an IllegalServerException wrapped within a 
> FunctionExceution in the body
> *THEN* the native client thinks there is an isue with the node and closes all 
> the endpoint's connections.
> ---
> *IT IS TO BE EXPECTED* That given that the exception is wrapped inside a 
> FunctionException this should be ignored by the endpoint failure detection 
> mechanism that native client has into place.
> *AS ADDITIONAL INFO* Currently, the exception chain relationship info is not 
> read by the native client, as it's serialized using Java serialization format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10396) IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint disconnection

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787315#comment-17787315
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10396:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #977: GEODE-10396: Avoid endpoint 
closure upon exception
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/977




> IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint 
> disconnection
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* A cluster of 3 servers and a client with a pool pointing to those 3 
> servers
>*AND* configured with PR-Singl-Hop = true
> *WHEN* A server function is executed with onRegion and with a filter
>*AND* it throws an IllegalServerException wrapped within a 
> FunctionExceution in the body
> *THEN* the native client thinks there is an isue with the node and closes all 
> the endpoint's connections.
> ---
> *IT IS TO BE EXPECTED* That given that the exception is wrapped inside a 
> FunctionException this should be ignored by the endpoint failure detection 
> mechanism that native client has into place.
> *AS ADDITIONAL INFO* Currently, the exception chain relationship info is not 
> read by the native client, as it's serialized using Java serialization format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10276) Refactor PDX (de)serialziation code to align it with Java client

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787313#comment-17787313
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10276:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #969: GEODE-10276: Refactor PDX 
(de)serialization code
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/969




> Refactor PDX (de)serialziation code to align it with Java client
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10276
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Currently there are the following open issues regarding PDX (de)serialization:
>  * [GEODE-9968 - Fix deserialization for new fields in PdxSerializable 
> class|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9968]
>  * [GEODE-9753 - Coredump during PdxSerializable object 
> serialization|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9753]
>  * [GEODE-10220 - Coredump while initializing PdxType 
> remoteToLocal|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10220]
>  * [GEODE-10255 - PdxSerializable not working correctly for multiple versions 
> of the same class|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10255]
> Also, the implementation on this ticket ([GEODE-8212: Reduce connections to 
> server to get type id|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8212]) 
> poses some issues with PDX entries which fields are a permutation. Thing is 
> that PdxTypes which fields are a permutation might use the wrong offsets, 
> leading to a corrupt serialization. This is something that was not taken into 
> account at the time of getting this PR merged.
> So this ticket should be reverted and possibly an alternative solution 
> proposed.
> In order to tackle these issues, a code refactoring is needed to introduce 
> the following implementations:
>  * Single type of PdxWriter
>  * An implementation PdxReader that tracks unread data, and other that don't.
>  * An implementation for PdxInstances that guarantees that fields are 
> actually written in alphabetical order, independently of the writeFields call 
> order. This should tackle the issue described above regarding GEODE-8212.
>  * Also, it'd be ideal to make it so PDX code is cleaner and easier to 
> understand, though that's a complex matter, and also, subjective.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10414) Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787320#comment-17787320
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10414:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/984#issuecomment-1816770978

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* have putIfAbsent region method implemented
> *SO THAT* I can atomically put entries only if they don't previously, exist 
> and also, to align it with the Java API.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10044) Allow for FunctionAttributes to be updated

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787310#comment-17787310
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10044:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/930#issuecomment-1816768908

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> Allow for FunctionAttributes to be updated 
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10044
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10044
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* to reset function attributes on-the-fly whenever a function 
> attributes mismatch is detected on the client
> *SO THAT* FunctionAttributes can be changed during an upgrade scenario
> 
> *Additional information.* Currently there is no exception being thrown from 
> the server whenever a function attributes missmatch is detected. Instead, a 
> function execution error is send to the client. So it remains to be tackled 
> how the mismatch is going to be detected on the client side.
> *Also, for additional context,* this feature is designed in order to fulfill 
> the following upgrade scenario:
>  # A server function called ExampleFunction is deployed inside a cluster. 
> This server function is defined with isHA=false
>  # Function is executed several times from the client.
>  # After some time, a new version of ExampleFunction jar is deployed. The new 
> version of the server function is defined with isHA=true
>  # After updating the server function, executions for this function inside 
> the client should fail at most once, and after that, execute smoothly with 
> the new function attributes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10044) Allow for FunctionAttributes to be updated

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787311#comment-17787311
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10044:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #930: GEODE-10044: Allow 
FunctionAttributes update
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/930




> Allow for FunctionAttributes to be updated 
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10044
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10044
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* to reset function attributes on-the-fly whenever a function 
> attributes mismatch is detected on the client
> *SO THAT* FunctionAttributes can be changed during an upgrade scenario
> 
> *Additional information.* Currently there is no exception being thrown from 
> the server whenever a function attributes missmatch is detected. Instead, a 
> function execution error is send to the client. So it remains to be tackled 
> how the mismatch is going to be detected on the client side.
> *Also, for additional context,* this feature is designed in order to fulfill 
> the following upgrade scenario:
>  # A server function called ExampleFunction is deployed inside a cluster. 
> This server function is defined with isHA=false
>  # Function is executed several times from the client.
>  # After some time, a new version of ExampleFunction jar is deployed. The new 
> version of the server function is defined with isHA=true
>  # After updating the server function, executions for this function inside 
> the client should fail at most once, and after that, execute smoothly with 
> the new function attributes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10012) Avoid retries for non-HA function execution

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787309#comment-17787309
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10012:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/920#issuecomment-1816767907

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> Avoid retries for non-HA function execution
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10012
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10012
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a cluster with 3 servers and 1 locator
> *AND* a PartitionedRegion with redundant-copies="1"
> *AND* a user-defined Function with isHA=false
> *AND* a geode-native client with a pool with single-hop enabled and retry 
> attempts set to 2
> *WHEN* execution fails due to a connectivity issue/connection 
> timeout/internal cluster error
> *THEN* function is retried twice
> 
> *Additional information.* The function is retried at the network code layer, 
> and given whenever there is a timeout/connectivity error, the BSL is removed 
> from the ClientMetadataService, whenever retries happen, you might get a 
> *InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException* exception thrown indicating: 
> {code:java}
> Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation {code}
> Also, have into account that Java client API behaviour never retries a 
> Function Execution if isHA=false for that function, and whenever isHA=true, 
> the function is retried but on the function execution logic and not at the 
> networking layer.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10012) Avoid retries for non-HA function execution

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787308#comment-17787308
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10012:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #920:  GEODE-10012: Avoid non-HA 
function retries
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/920




> Avoid retries for non-HA function execution
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10012
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10012
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a cluster with 3 servers and 1 locator
> *AND* a PartitionedRegion with redundant-copies="1"
> *AND* a user-defined Function with isHA=false
> *AND* a geode-native client with a pool with single-hop enabled and retry 
> attempts set to 2
> *WHEN* execution fails due to a connectivity issue/connection 
> timeout/internal cluster error
> *THEN* function is retried twice
> 
> *Additional information.* The function is retried at the network code layer, 
> and given whenever there is a timeout/connectivity error, the BSL is removed 
> from the ClientMetadataService, whenever retries happen, you might get a 
> *InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException* exception thrown indicating: 
> {code:java}
> Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation {code}
> Also, have into account that Java client API behaviour never retries a 
> Function Execution if isHA=false for that function, and whenever isHA=true, 
> the function is retried but on the function execution logic and not at the 
> networking layer.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10017) Fix new ITs unstability for TCs that involve members restart

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787307#comment-17787307
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10017:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/919#issuecomment-1816767172

   I haven't had the time to work on this for a long time or I think I'll have 
the opportunity to in the near future, hence I am closing this PR, if anyone 
wants to tackle this issue can take it up from its latest state.




> Fix new ITs unstability for TCs that involve members restart
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10017
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10017
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* an integration TC on which a server restart needs to be restarted
> *WHEN* the server is starting up again
> *THEN* +{color:#172b4d}it might{color}+{color:#172b4d} happen that the TC 
> gets stuck{color}
> 
> *Additional information.* This issue does not always happens, and I've seen 
> it happening more frequently with the latest version of Geode server (1.15.0)
> Some examples of this TC are:
>  * RegisterKeysTest.RegisterKeySetAndClusterRestart
>  * PartitionRegionWithRedundancyTest.putgetWithSingleHop
>  * ···
> Also, this is normally the exec flow for the TCs that get stuck:
>  # Setup cluster
>  # Do TC specific ops
>  # Stop server(s)/Cluster shutdown
>  # Start server(s)
> In all cases, the server gets stuck at step 4



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10017) Fix new ITs unstability for TCs that involve members restart

2023-11-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787306#comment-17787306
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10017:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #919: GEODE-10017: Fix servers restart 
within new ITs
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/919




> Fix new ITs unstability for TCs that involve members restart
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10017
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10017
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* an integration TC on which a server restart needs to be restarted
> *WHEN* the server is starting up again
> *THEN* +{color:#172b4d}it might{color}+{color:#172b4d} happen that the TC 
> gets stuck{color}
> 
> *Additional information.* This issue does not always happens, and I've seen 
> it happening more frequently with the latest version of Geode server (1.15.0)
> Some examples of this TC are:
>  * RegisterKeysTest.RegisterKeySetAndClusterRestart
>  * PartitionRegionWithRedundancyTest.putgetWithSingleHop
>  * ···
> Also, this is normally the exec flow for the TCs that get stuck:
>  # Setup cluster
>  # Do TC specific ops
>  # Stop server(s)/Cluster shutdown
>  # Start server(s)
> In all cases, the server gets stuck at step 4



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10447) Support JDK11 for Geode

2023-06-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10447:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Support JDK11 for Geode
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10447
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10447
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Jie Wen
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10443) Update shiro-core to version 1.11.0 for CVE-2022-40664

2023-06-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10443:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Update shiro-core to version 1.11.0 for CVE-2022-40664
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10443
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10443
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.15.1
>Reporter: Ankush Mittal
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> As per [https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40664] ,
> _"Apache Shiro before 1.10.0, Authentication Bypass Vulnerability in Shiro 
> when forwarding or including via RequestDispatcher."_
> Geode 1.15.1 bundles version 1.9.1 of shiro-core jar which is vulnerable as 
> per the CVE.
> Also although the CVE doesn't include "1.10.0", but since more latest version 
> "1.11.0" is available, logged ticket to bundle the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10446) Capture build scans on ge.apache.org to benefit from deep build insights

2023-06-12 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10446:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Capture build scans on ge.apache.org to benefit from deep build insights  
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10446
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Clay Johnson
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> This improvement will enhance the functionality of the Geode build by 
> publishing build scans to [ge.apache.org|https://ge.apache.org/], hosted by 
> the Apache Software Foundation and run in partnership between the ASF and 
> Gradle. This Gradle Enterprise instance has all features and extensions 
> enabled and is freely available for use by the Apache Geode project and all 
> other Apache projects.
> On this Gradle Enterprise instance, Apache Geode will have access not only to 
> all of the published build scans but other aggregate data features such as:
>  * Dashboards to view all historical build scans, along with performance 
> trends over time
>  * Build failure analytics for enhanced investigation and diagnosis of build 
> failures
>  * Test failure analytics to better understand trends and causes around slow, 
> failing, and flaky tests
> If interested in exploring a fully populated Gradle Enterprise instance, 
> please explore the Maven builds already connected to 
> [ge.apache.org|https://ge.apache.org/], the [Spring project’s 
> instance|https://ge.spring.io/scans?search.relativeStartTime=P28D=Europe/Zurich],
>  or any number of other [OSS 
> projects|https://gradle.com/enterprise-customers/oss-projects/] for which we 
> sponsor instances of Gradle Enterprise.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10445) [Geode Main] Migrate distributedTest to GHA

2023-04-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10445:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> [Geode Main] Migrate distributedTest to GHA
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10445
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10442) [Geode Main] Migrate acceptanceTest to GHA

2023-03-28 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10442:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> [Geode Main] Migrate acceptanceTest to GHA
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10442
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10441) [Geode Main] Migrate integrationTest to GHA

2023-02-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10441:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> [Geode Main] Migrate integrationTest to GHA
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10441
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10441
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10433) Migrate to new CI

2023-01-28 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10433:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Migrate to new CI
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10433
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: build, ci
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Migrating Geode CI onto Apache Infra Jenkins from sponsored Concourse infra.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10434) [Geode Main] Migrate to GH Action build & unit-test pipeline

2023-01-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10434:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> [Geode Main] Migrate to GH Action build & unit-test pipeline
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10434
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10438) [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions

2023-01-22 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17679674#comment-17679674
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10438:


sboorlagadda merged PR #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-benchmarks/pull/170




> [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10438
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10438) [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions

2023-01-20 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17679370#comment-17679370
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10438:


sboorlagadda commented on PR #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-benchmarks/pull/170#issuecomment-1399101806

   @scmbuildguy Thanks Mark for checking on this. The build passed now. Would 
you mind approving this PR?




> [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10438
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Assignee: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10438) [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions

2023-01-20 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17679267#comment-17679267
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10438:


scmbuildguy commented on PR #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-benchmarks/pull/170#issuecomment-1398791331

   Looks like the build failed in Task :harness:test task with SSH issues. I 
see the line for the SSH key file changed, most likely related to the test 
failures?




> [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10438
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10438) [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions

2023-01-20 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10438:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> [Geode Benchmarks] Migrate to GH Actions
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10438
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10438
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10437) [Geode Site] Migrate to GH Action

2023-01-19 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10437:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> [Geode Site] Migrate to GH Action
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10437
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10437) [Geode Site] Migrate to GH Action

2023-01-19 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17678970#comment-17678970
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10437:


sboorlagadda merged PR #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-site/pull/21




> [Geode Site] Migrate to GH Action
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10437
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sai Boorlagadda
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10429) Setup up GH actions as CI solution

2022-10-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17619730#comment-17619730
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10429:


gaussianrecurrence closed pull request #987: [WIP] GEODE-10429: Setup GitHub 
actions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/987




> Setup up GH actions as CI solution
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10429
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* setup the CI solution within GH actions
> *SO THAT* contributions can be verified



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10429) Setup up GH actions as CI solution

2022-10-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17616959#comment-17616959
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10429:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/987

- Testing GHCR container packages




> Setup up GH actions as CI solution
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10429
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* setup the CI solution within GH actions
> *SO THAT* contributions can be verified



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10429) Setup up GH actions as CI solution

2022-10-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10429:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Setup up GH actions as CI solution
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10429
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* setup the CI solution within GH actions
> *SO THAT* contributions can be verified



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10401) Oplog recovery takes too long due to fault in fastutil library

2022-10-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17615335#comment-17615335
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10401:


onichols-pivotal opened a new pull request, #986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/986

   Native client hardcodes Geode version to test with in several places. Update 
those variables to latest-and-greatest apache-geode 1.15.1




> Oplog recovery takes too long due to fault in fastutil library
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10401
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10401
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jakov Varenina
>Assignee: Jakov Varenina
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.15.1, 1.16.0
>
>
> {color:#0e101a}As we already know, the .drf file delete operations only 
> contain OplogEntryID. During recovery, the server reads (byte by byte) each 
> OplogEntryID and stores it in a HashSet to use later when recovering .crf 
> files. There are two types of HashSets: IntOpenHashSet and LongOpenHashSet. 
> The OplogEntryID of type 
> {color}_{color:#0e101a}integer{color}_{color:#0e101a} will be stored in 
> IntOpenHashSet, and {color}_{color:#0e101a}long 
> integer{color}_{color:#0e101a} in LongOpenHashSet, probably due to memory 
> optimization and performance factors. OplogEntryID starts with a zero and 
> increments throughout time.
> {color}
> {color:#0e101a}We have observed in logs that between exception (There is a 
> large number of deleted entries) and the previous log have passed more than 4 
> minutes (sometimes even more).{color}
> {code:java}
> {"timestamp":"2022-06-14T21:41:43.772+08:00","severity":"info","message":"Recovering
>  oplog#271 /opt/dbservice/data/datastore/BACKUPdataDiskStore_271.drf for disk 
> store dataDiskStore.","metadata":
> {"timestamp":"2022-06-14T21:46:02.152+08:00","severity":"warning","message":"There
>  is a large number of deleted entries within the disk-store, please execute 
> an offline
> compaction.","metadata":
> {code}
> {color:#0e101a}When the above exception occurs, that means that the limit of 
> {color}_{color:#0e101a}805306401{color}_{color:#0e101a} entries in 
> IntOpenHashSet has been reached. In that case, the server rolls to the new 
> IntOpenHashSet, where an exception and the delay could happen again.{color}
> {color:#0e101a}The problem is that due to the fault in FastUtil dependency 
> (IntOpenHashSet and LongOpenHashSet), the unnecessary rehashing happens 
> multiple times before the max size is reached. The{color} 
> _{color:#0e101a}rehashing starts from{color}_ {color:#0e101a}805306368 
> onwards for each new entry until the max size. This rehashing adds several 
> minutes to .drf Oplog recovery, but does nothing as max is already 
> reached.{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10426) Make documentation generation optional

2022-10-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17613185#comment-17613185
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10426:


albertogpz merged PR #985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/985




> Make documentation generation optional
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10426
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10426
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* native client contributor
> *I WANT TO* have documentation conditionally generated
> *AND* be generated by default
> *SO THAT* compilation time is reduced
> *AND* users do not need doxygen as dependency just to compile the library



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10426) Make documentation generation optional

2022-10-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17613179#comment-17613179
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10426:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/985

- Added a option in the CMake project to enable documentation generation.
- In order to maintain backward compatibility, by default documentation 
generation is enabled.




> Make documentation generation optional
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10426
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10426
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>
> *AS A* native client contributor
> *I WANT TO* have documentation conditionally generated
> *AND* be generated by default
> *SO THAT* compilation time is reduced
> *AND* users do not need doxygen as dependency just to compile the library



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10426) Make documentation generation optional

2022-10-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10426:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Make documentation generation optional
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10426
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10426
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* native client contributor
> *I WANT TO* have documentation conditionally generated
> *AND* be generated by default
> *SO THAT* compilation time is reduced
> *AND* users do not need doxygen as dependency just to compile the library



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10291) Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)

2022-10-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17613165#comment-17613165
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10291:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/968#issuecomment-1265076566

   Hi @moleske & @pivotal-jbarrett, it seems to me that @moleke addressed all 
the comments, so I am not sure is this can be merged already?




> Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.15.1, 1.16.0
>
>
> Native client should compile on the latest (ubuntu 22.04) operating system.
> Consider including a new pipeline as part of this



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10425) Add option to suppress Krf file creation

2022-09-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10425:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Add option to suppress Krf file creation
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10425
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10425
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: persistence
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Add option to not create Krf file.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10424) Improve parallel gateway sender logic

2022-09-25 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10424:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Improve parallel gateway sender logic
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10424
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: wan
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Improve logic of putting events in queue, for parallel gateway sender 
> connected to region with redundancy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10416) Update to Boost 1.80.0

2022-09-22 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10416:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Update to Boost 1.80.0
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10416
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10416
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Weiyi Luo
>Assignee: Weiyi Luo
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10416) Update to Boost 1.80.0

2022-09-22 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17608252#comment-17608252
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10416:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/983#issuecomment-1254954586

   I think the issue you are facing for Windows compilation is the same as 
faced while trying to upgrade to Boost 1.79.0 in this PR #967
   So, after looking into it, turns out, @moleske was in the right path, the 
issue has to do with _WIN32_WINNT and some issue with Boost
   Thing is boost_log was being compiled with **_WIN32_WINNT=0x0600**, even if 
your compilation target is >=0x0A00 (Windows 10, Windows 2016, Windows 2017, 
Windows 2019), and on the other side, geode-native modules using boost_log had 
_WIN32_WINNT defined as 0x0602 (which is a mistake btw, as, _WIN32_WINNT 
should fit in 16 bits, being 8 first for the major version and the 8 remaining 
for the minor version), causing boost_log to use **boost::log::v2s_mt_nt62** 
namespace, but since boost_log was compiled with **_WIN32_WINNT=0x0600**, the 
only available symbols in libboost_log.lib are the ones pointing to 
**boost::log::v2s_mt_nt6** namespace.
   
   I've tested the fix with GH actions and seems to be working: 
https://github.com/Nordix/geode-native/commit/0aa3d709cbcfcf915373f589e213f796cade616a#diff-3971f6cd87e6fed8494466300f14922d1869759f063ffc6170da0542d386180c
   
   In order to ensure that boost_log was compiled with _WIN32_WINNT it's needed 
to define **BOOST_USE_WINAPI_VERSION=0x0602**
   And also, right now, we haven't seen any issue because of having set 
_WIN32_WINNT to the wrong value to the Boost lib interface, but it'd be good to 
have it set to the right value, **_WIN32_WINNT=0x0602**




> Update to Boost 1.80.0
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10416
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10416
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Weiyi Luo
>Assignee: Weiyi Luo
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10414) Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces

2022-09-19 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17606478#comment-17606478
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10414:


albertogpz commented on code in PR #984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/984#discussion_r973963090


##
cppcache/integration/test/RegionPutTest.cpp:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include 
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#include 
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#include "CacheRegionHelper.hpp"
+#include "framework/Cluster.h"
+#include "framework/Framework.h"
+#include "framework/Gfsh.h"
+
+namespace {
+
+using apache::geode::client::Cache;
+using apache::geode::client::Cacheable;
+using apache::geode::client::CacheableKey;
+using apache::geode::client::CacheableString;
+using apache::geode::client::CommitConflictException;
+using apache::geode::client::Pool;
+using apache::geode::client::Region;
+using apache::geode::client::RegionShortcut;
+
+using std::chrono::minutes;
+
+using ::testing::Eq;
+using ::testing::IsNull;
+using ::testing::NotNull;
+
+Cache createCache() {
+  using apache::geode::client::CacheFactory;
+
+  auto cache = CacheFactory()
+   .set("log-level", "debug")
+   .set("statistic-sampling-enabled", "false")
+   .create();
+
+  return cache;
+}
+
+std::shared_ptr createPool(Cluster& cluster, Cache& cache) {
+  auto poolFactory = cache.getPoolManager().createFactory();
+  cluster.applyLocators(poolFactory);
+  return poolFactory.create("default");
+}
+
+std::shared_ptr setupRegion(Cache& cache,
+const std::shared_ptr& pool) {
+  auto region = cache.createRegionFactory(RegionShortcut::PROXY)
+.setPoolName(pool->getName())
+.create("region");
+
+  return region;
+}
+
+std::shared_ptr setupCachingRegion(Cache& cache,
+   const std::shared_ptr& pool) {
+  auto region = cache.createRegionFactory(RegionShortcut::CACHING_PROXY)
+.setPoolName(pool->getName())
+.create("region");
+
+  return region;
+}
+
+TEST(RegionPutTest, testPutIfAbsentNotExistingEntry) {
+  Cluster cluster{LocatorCount{1}, ServerCount{1}};
+
+  cluster.start();
+
+  cluster.getGfsh()
+  .create()
+  .region()
+  .withName("region")
+  .withType("REPLICATE")
+  .execute();
+
+  auto cache = createCache();
+  auto pool = createPool(cluster, cache);
+  auto region = setupRegion(cache, pool);
+  auto key = CacheableKey::create("key-1");
+  auto value = CacheableString::create("value");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(region->putIfAbsent(key, value), IsNull());
+
+  auto retrieved = region->get(key);
+  EXPECT_THAT(retrieved, NotNull());
+
+  auto converted = std::dynamic_pointer_cast(retrieved);
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted, NotNull());
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted->toString(), Eq(value->toString()));
+}
+
+TEST(RegionPutTest, testPutIfAbsentNotExistingEntryWithCaching) {
+  Cluster cluster{LocatorCount{1}, ServerCount{1}};
+
+  cluster.start();
+
+  cluster.getGfsh()
+  .create()
+  .region()
+  .withName("region")
+  .withType("REPLICATE")
+  .execute();
+
+  auto cache = createCache();
+  auto pool = createPool(cluster, cache);
+  auto region = setupCachingRegion(cache, pool);
+  auto key = CacheableKey::create("key-1");
+  auto value = CacheableString::create("value");
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(region->putIfAbsent(key, value), IsNull());
+
+  auto retrieved = region->get(key);
+  EXPECT_THAT(retrieved, NotNull());
+
+  auto converted = std::dynamic_pointer_cast(retrieved);
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted, NotNull());
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted->toString(), Eq(value->toString()));
+
+  // Verify cached value matches expected
+  auto entry = region->getEntry(key);
+  EXPECT_THAT(entry, NotNull());
+
+  retrieved = entry->getValue();
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted, NotNull());
+
+  converted = std::dynamic_pointer_cast(retrieved);
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted, NotNull());
+  EXPECT_THAT(converted->toString(), 

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10423) Document the system property “ON_DISCONNECT_CLEAR_PDXTYPEIDS“

2022-09-19 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10423:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Document the system property “ON_DISCONNECT_CLEAR_PDXTYPEIDS“
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10423
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10423
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: docs
>Reporter: Tim Zhang
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Document the java system property “ON_DISCONNECT_CLEAR_PDXTYPEIDS“, this 
> property is used by Java client. add instructions for using this property.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10291) Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)

2022-09-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17605444#comment-17605444
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10291:


moleske commented on code in PR #968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/968#discussion_r972202959


##
docker/ubuntu-22.04/Dockerfile:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+# distributed with this work for additional information
+# regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+# with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+
+FROM ubuntu:22.04
+LABEL maintainer Apache Geode 
+
+USER root
+WORKDIR /
+
+ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive
+RUN apt update && \
+apt -yq full-upgrade && \
+apt-get -y install \
+apt-transport-https \
+ca-certificates \
+curl \
+gnupg2 \
+software-properties-common && \
+apt-get -y autoremove && \
+apt-get autoclean
+
+RUN . /etc/os-release && \
+curl -s https://download.bell-sw.com/pki/GPG-KEY-bellsoft | apt-key add - 
&& \
+apt-add-repository "deb http://apt.bell-sw.com/ stable main"
+
+RUN apt update && apt -yq full-upgrade && apt-get -y install \
+build-essential \
+libc++-dev \
+libc++abi-dev \
+zlib1g-dev \
+libssl-dev \
+bellsoft-java11 \
+git \
+doxygen \
+graphviz \
+clang-format-12 && \
+apt-get -y autoremove && \
+apt-get autoclean
+
+# Get latest release of CMake ignoring pre-releases
+RUN installer=$(mktemp) \
+&& curl -o ${installer} -L $(curl -s 
https://api.github.com/repos/Kitware/CMake/releases \
+| grep -P -i 
'browser_download_url.*cmake-\d+\.\d+\.\d+-linux-x86_64\.sh' \
+| head -n 1 \
+| cut -d : -f 2,3 \
+| tr -d '"') \
+&& bash ${installer} --skip-license --prefix=/usr/local \
+&& rm ${installer}
+
+ARG GEODE_VERSION=1.14.4

Review Comment:
   ah joys of forgetting about prs for months on end, can bump it





> Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Native client should compile on the latest (ubuntu 22.04) operating system.
> Consider including a new pipeline as part of this



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10291) Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)

2022-09-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17605438#comment-17605438
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10291:


moleske merged PR #966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/966




> Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Native client should compile on the latest (ubuntu 22.04) operating system.
> Consider including a new pipeline as part of this



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-9896) Upgrade dependencies

2022-09-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17605351#comment-17605351
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-9896:
---

pivotal-jbarrett closed pull request #899: GEODE-9896: Upgrades dependencies.
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/899




> Upgrade dependencies
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-9896
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9896
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Jacob Barrett
>Assignee: Jacob Barrett
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> * ACE 7.0.5
> * Boost 1.78.0
> * SQLite 3.37



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-9896) Upgrade dependencies

2022-09-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17605299#comment-17605299
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-9896:
---

gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/899#issuecomment-1248021514

   Considering geode-native is not using ACE anymore and SQLite was already 
updated, and also there is another PR to update Boost, maybe this can be closed 
@pivotal-jbarrett ?




> Upgrade dependencies
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-9896
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9896
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Jacob Barrett
>Assignee: Jacob Barrett
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> * ACE 7.0.5
> * Boost 1.78.0
> * SQLite 3.37



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10291) Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)

2022-09-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17605283#comment-17605283
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10291:


gaussianrecurrence commented on code in PR #968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/968#discussion_r971864236


##
docker/ubuntu-22.04/Dockerfile:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+# distributed with this work for additional information
+# regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+# with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+
+FROM ubuntu:22.04
+LABEL maintainer Apache Geode 
+
+USER root
+WORKDIR /
+
+ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive
+RUN apt update && \
+apt -yq full-upgrade && \
+apt-get -y install \
+apt-transport-https \
+ca-certificates \
+curl \
+gnupg2 \
+software-properties-common && \
+apt-get -y autoremove && \
+apt-get autoclean
+
+RUN . /etc/os-release && \
+curl -s https://download.bell-sw.com/pki/GPG-KEY-bellsoft | apt-key add - 
&& \
+apt-add-repository "deb http://apt.bell-sw.com/ stable main"
+
+RUN apt update && apt -yq full-upgrade && apt-get -y install \
+build-essential \
+libc++-dev \
+libc++abi-dev \
+zlib1g-dev \
+libssl-dev \
+bellsoft-java11 \
+git \
+doxygen \
+graphviz \
+clang-format-12 && \
+apt-get -y autoremove && \
+apt-get autoclean
+
+# Get latest release of CMake ignoring pre-releases
+RUN installer=$(mktemp) \
+&& curl -o ${installer} -L $(curl -s 
https://api.github.com/repos/Kitware/CMake/releases \
+| grep -P -i 
'browser_download_url.*cmake-\d+\.\d+\.\d+-linux-x86_64\.sh' \
+| head -n 1 \
+| cut -d : -f 2,3 \
+| tr -d '"') \
+&& bash ${installer} --skip-license --prefix=/usr/local \
+&& rm ${installer}
+
+ARG GEODE_VERSION=1.14.4

Review Comment:
   Considering latest version is 1.15.0, maybe this needs to be updated





> Support Jammy (ubuntu 22.04)
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10291
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Native client should compile on the latest (ubuntu 22.04) operating system.
> Consider including a new pipeline as part of this



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10422) Add doc for using parallel recovery disk store

2022-09-14 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10422:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Add doc for using parallel recovery disk store
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10422
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: docs
>Affects Versions: 1.14.0, 1.15.0
>Reporter: Mario Kevo
>Assignee: Mario Kevo
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> There are missing part for parallel recovery of disk stores.
> It isn't specified that in case the user use the same disk store for the pdx 
> and the region, disk store recovery will go in the sequential mode. So in 
> case you want to use parallel disk store recovery it should be different disk 
> stores for the pdx and the disk store. Otherwise, it will go sequentially, 
> despite of default behavior to run in the parallel mode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10410) Rebalance Guard Prevent Lost Bucket Recovery

2022-09-14 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10410:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Rebalance Guard Prevent Lost Bucket Recovery
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10410
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Weijie Xu
>Assignee: Weijie Xu
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
> Attachments: server2.log, test.tar.gz
>
>
> Following steps reproduce the issue:
> Run the start.gfsh in the attached example, which configures a geode system 
> with a partitioned region and a gateway sender. So there are two regions, the 
> manually created region, and the queue region.
> Then run the example code, which will source ~400M data and 5 times amount of 
> events into the system. All data are sourced into the system, no bucket lost, 
> and no out of memory.
> Then stop one of the server, and revoke the disk file of the server.
> Then start the server, which will trigger a bucket recovery. After that, 
> there will be part of secondary bucket lost.
> gfsh>show metrics --region=/example-region
>           | numBucketsWithoutRedundancy  | 63
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10421) Enhancment of start gw sender with clean-queue

2022-09-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10421:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Enhancment of start gw sender with clean-queue
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10421
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10421
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: gfsh, wan
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Reject command if gateway sender is not stopped on all servers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10402) Fix FunctionException handling

2022-09-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17603521#comment-17603521
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10402:


albertogpz merged PR #981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/981




> Fix FunctionException handling
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10402
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a ServerFunction throwing a FunctionException
> *WHEN* its executed
> *THEN* a CacheServerException is thrown rather FunctionException
> 
> *Additional info.* FunctionException seems not to be handled, that's why the 
> default handling exception is thrown by the native API, CacheServerException



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10415) CVEs detected in latest geode

2022-09-13 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10415:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> CVEs detected in latest geode
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10415
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10415
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.15.0
>Reporter: Shruti
>Assignee: Mario Kevo
>Priority: Blocker
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> We are detecting the following CVEs with geode
>  High or critical vulnerabilities: 21
> The spring-core is likely Not Affected. But we would like to know about the 
> rest of these listed CVEs. Any info is appreciated
> {{ }}
> {{NAME                            INSTALLED              FIXED-IN     TYPE    
>       VULNERABILITY        SEVERITY}}
> {{jetty-security                  9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-server                    9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-servlet                   9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-util                      9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-util-ajax                 9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-webapp                    9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-xml                       9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jgroups                         3.6.14.Final           4.0.0        
> java-archive  GHSA-rc7h-x6cq-988q  Critical}}
> {{shiro-cache                     1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-config-core               1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-config-ogdl               1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-core                      1.9.0                  1.9.1        
> java-archive  GHSA-4cf5-xmhp-3xj7  Critical}}
> {{shiro-core                      1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-crypto-cipher             1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-crypto-core               1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-crypto-hash               1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-event                     1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{shiro-lang                      1.9.0                               
> java-archive  CVE-2022-32532       Critical}}
> {{spring-core                     5.3.20                              
> java-archive  CVE-2016-127     Critical}}
> {{jetty-http                      9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}
> {{jetty-io                        9.4.46.v20220331                    
> java-archive  CVE-2022-2048        High}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10414) Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces

2022-09-12 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17603015#comment-17603015
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10414:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/984

   - Moved PUT actions from LocalRegion into its own modules.
   - Added PutIfAbsent action.
   - Added the necessary scaffolding for put requests to return a value.
   - Moved TcrMessagePut implementation into its own file. Now this message
 type accepts an operation as input.
   - Moved TcrMessageDestroy implementation into its own file. Now this
 message accepts an operation as input.
   - Also, updated TcrMessageDestroy operation format so it uses a byte
 part instead of an object.
   - Added putIfAbsent method to the Region interface and its
 implementations both for LocalRegion and ThinClientRegion.
   - Modified LocalRegion and ThinClientRegion to comply with the above
 code changes.
   - Modified PUT's old value parsing to handle null pointer.
   - Also replaced Cacheable type by Serializable in some places in order
 in order to take advantage of fast-forward definition.




> Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* have putIfAbsent region method implemented
> *SO THAT* I can atomically put entries only if they don't previously, exist 
> and also, to align it with the Java API.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10414) Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces

2022-09-12 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10414:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Add putIfAbsent method to region interfaces
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10414
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *AS A* geode-native contributor
> *I WANT TO* have putIfAbsent region method implemented
> *SO THAT* I can atomically put entries only if they don't previously, exist 
> and also, to align it with the Java API.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10420) Handle WAN event when interrupted

2022-09-12 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10420:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Handle WAN event when interrupted
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10420
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10420
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> It is possible that an event of which a gateway sender is to be notified is 
> lost if during the process the thread is interrupted.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10419) Enhancment of backup disk-store command

2022-09-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10419:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Enhancment of backup disk-store command
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10419
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10419
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: gfsh, persistence
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Add additional option to perform backup only for specified disk-store(s).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10331) DistributionImpl.destroyMember keeps cache alive for some number of seconds

2022-09-08 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10331:
---
Labels: blocks-1.16.0 pull-request-available  (was: blocks-1.16.0)

> DistributionImpl.destroyMember keeps cache alive for some number of seconds
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10331
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10331
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: membership
>Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: blocks-1.16.0, pull-request-available
>
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.DistributionImpl.destroyMember creates 
> a thread that will hold onto the DIstributesSystem/Cache through the 
> DirectChannel it has for 3 seconds by default. It could be even longer if 
> p2p.disconnectDelay is set to a value > 3000.
> This can be a problem if the JVM is trying to reconnect since this old cache 
> uses memory.
> Instead of creating a new thread for every call of destroyMember, we should 
> just have a single ScheduledExecutor that we schedule the background 
> "closeEndpoint" with.
> Also since all this code interacts with the DirectChannel all the logic about 
> the executor and scheduling it should belong to DirectChannel, not the 
> DistributionImpl.
> When the DirectChannel has disconnect called on it, then it should get rid of 
> all the tasks scheduled in the executor since they are no longer needed.
> I think this issue has been around for a long time because the creation of 
> the thread refers to fixing "Bug 37944" which is on old bug system that is 
> not longer used for geode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10395) TXLockIdImpl memory leak after CommitConflictException from another node

2022-09-07 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10395:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> TXLockIdImpl memory leak after CommitConflictException from another node
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10395
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.14.0, 1.15.0
>Reporter: Eugene Nedzvetsky
>Assignee: Mario Kevo
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.locks.TXLockServiceImpl#txLock:120 adds 
> TXLockIdImpl  objects to TXLockServiceImpl#txLockIdList. 
> {code:java}
> synchronized (txLockIdList) {
> txLockId = new TXLockIdImpl(dlock.getDistributionManager().getId());
> txLockIdList.add(txLockId);
>   }
> {code}
> These objects will not be removed from this list if dlock.acquireTryLocks 
> returned false.
> {code:java}
>   gotLocks = dlock.acquireTryLocks(batch, TIMEOUT_MILLIS, LEASE_MILLIS, 
> keyIfFail);
>   if (gotLocks) { // ...otherwise race can occur between tryLocks and 
> readLock
> acquireRecoveryReadLock();
>   } else if (keyIfFail[0] != null) {
> throw new CommitConflictException(
> String.format("Concurrent transaction commit detected %s",
> keyIfFail[0]));
>   } else {
> throw new CommitConflictException(
> String.format("Failed to request try locks from grantor: %s",
> dlock.getLockGrantorId()));
>   }
> {code}
> It throws CommitConflictException and after that system doesn't have a 
> txLockId reference and this txLockId will be never removed from this list.
> It produces critical performance degradation. txLockIdList has a few hundred 
> thousand txLocks after a few weeks and TXLockServiceImpl#release iterates 
> this list 2 times on every tx commit and the same time "synchronized 
> (txLockIdList)" locks other threads.
> TXLockIdImpl#equals works really slow because it checks bunch of variables in 
> memberId.equals(that.memberId).
> {code:java}
> public void release(TXLockId txLockId) {
> synchronized (txLockIdList) {
>   if (!txLockIdList.contains(txLockId)) {
> // TXLockService.destroyServices can be invoked in cache.close().
> // Other P2P threads could process message such as TXCommitMessage 
> afterwards,
> // and invoke TXLockService.createDTLS(). It could create a new 
> TXLockService
> // which will have a new empty list (txLockIdList) and it will not
> // contain the originally added txLockId
> throw new IllegalArgumentException(
> String.format("Invalid txLockId not found: %s",
> txLockId));
>   }
>   dlock.releaseTryLocks(txLockId, () -> {
> return recovering;
>   });
>   txLockIdList.remove(txLockId);
>   releaseRecoveryReadLock();
> }
>   }
> {code}
> I think TXLockServiceImpl#txLock should remove this txLockId from 
> TXLockServiceImpl#txLockIdList in case of CommitConflictException:
> {code:java}
>  if (gotLocks) { // ...otherwise race can occur between tryLocks and readLock
> acquireRecoveryReadLock();
> } else if (keyIfFail[0] != null) {
> synchronized (this.txLockIdList) {
> this.txLockIdList.remove(txLockId);
> }
> throw new CommitConflictException(
> String.format("Concurrent transaction commit detected 
> %s",
> keyIfFail[0]));
> } else {
> synchronized (this.txLockIdList) {
> this.txLockIdList.remove(txLockId);
> }
> throw new CommitConflictException(
> String.format("Failed to request try locks from 
> grantor: %s",
> this.dlock.getLockGrantorId()));
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10417) Fix NullPointerException when getting events from the gw sender queue to complete transactions

2022-09-06 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10417:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Fix NullPointerException when getting events from the gw sender queue to 
> complete transactions
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10417
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10417
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: wan
>Affects Versions: 1.13.8, 1.14.4, 1.15.0
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> When the WAN group-transaction-events feature is enabled in a parallel 
> gateway sender, it is possible to get a NullPointerException when retrieving 
> events from the queue to complete a transaction if the event in the queue is 
> null.
> If this situation is reached then the gateway sender dispatcher will not 
> dispatch queue events anymore and therefore the WAN replication will not 
> progress.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10335) TXManagerImpl.close does not remove itself from the static singeton

2022-09-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10335:
---
Labels: blocks-1.16.0 pull-request-available  (was: blocks-1.16.0)

> TXManagerImpl.close does not remove itself from the static singeton
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10335
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: transactions
>Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: blocks-1.16.0, pull-request-available
>
> TXManagerImpl.close does not remove itself from the static singleton. This 
> causes it to keep the GemFireCacheImpl alive after it has been closed.
> The simple fix is to add "currentInstance = null" at the end of the close 
> method.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10336) ConnectionTable.close does not null out its static lastInstance field

2022-09-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10336:
---
Labels: blocks-1.16.0 pull-request-available  (was: blocks-1.16.0)

> ConnectionTable.close does not null out its static lastInstance field
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10336
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10336
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: membership
>Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: blocks-1.16.0, pull-request-available
>
> The ConnectionTable.close method does a bunch of work but it does not null 
> out the static "lastInstance" atomic. This causes it to keep the 
> ConnectionTable alive which ends up keeping the InternalDistributedSystem 
> alive.
> The easiest fix is to do  this at the end of close: "emergencyClose();". The 
> emergencyClose correctly set the lastInstance atomic to null.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10337) SocketCreatorFactory does not null out instance static

2022-09-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10337:
---
Labels: blocks-1.16.0 pull-request-available  (was: blocks-1.16.0)

> SocketCreatorFactory does not null out instance static
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10337
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10337
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: membership
>Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: blocks-1.16.0, pull-request-available
>
> The SocketCreatorFactory has a static "instance" field that keeps the 
> singleton factory. The factory has a reference in "distributionConfig" that 
> ends up keeping the InternalDistributedSystem alive after disconnect.
> It also has a static close method but the product never calls it.
> To fix this leak do the following:
> On InternalDistributedSystem.disconnect add to the end of it:
> {code:java}
>   if (!attemptingToReconnect) {
> SocketCreatorFactory.close();
>   }
> {code}
> Also I think it would be good to change SocketCreatorFactory.getInstance to 
> null out the static when close it called like so:
> {code:java}
>   private static synchronized SocketCreatorFactory getInstance(boolean 
> closing) {
> SocketCreatorFactory result = instance;
> if (result == null && !closing) {
>   result = new SocketCreatorFactory();
>   instance = result;
> } else if (result != null && closing) {
>   instance = null;
> }
> return result;
>   }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10339) The server fails to start because the .crf or the .drf file is missing

2022-09-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10339:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> The server fails to start because the .crf or the .drf file is missing
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10339
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10339
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jakov Varenina
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {color:#0e101a}The server fails with following:{color}
> {code:java}
> {"timestamp":"2022-05-16T08:25:35.708Z","severity":"error","message":"Cache 
> initialization for GemFireCache[id = 776315735; isClosing = false; 
> isShutDownAll = false; created = Mon May 16 08:25:33 UTC 2022; server = 
> false; copyOnRead = false; lockLease = 120; lockTimeout = 60] failed because: 
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: The following required files could not be 
> found: *.crf files with these ids: 
> [33].","metadata":{"function":"KVDB"},"version":"1.1.0","service_id":"eric-udr-kvdb-ag","extra_data":{"thread_info":{"thread_name":"main","thread_id":"1"},"e":{"exception":""}}}
> {code}
>  
> {color:#0e101a}As a last compaction step, the server deletes the compacted 
> .crf file. The deletion is done in the following way:{color}
>  # {color:#0e101a}Write delete operation (delete ".crf" file) in the ".if" 
> file. {color}
>  # {color:#0e101a}Delete .crf file{color}
> {color:#0e101a}The problem with server startup happens in the following 
> scenario:{color}
>  # {color:#0e101a}The server writes the delete operation (for .crf file) in 
> the ".if" file. The write is not immediately flushed to the ".if" file, but 
> it goes to the async write buffer.{color}
>  # {color:#0e101a}The server deletes the ".crf" file.{color}
>  # {color:#0e101a}The forceful restart (of the machine where the server 
> resides) happens before the async write buffer is flushed to the ".if" file. 
> This scenario leaves the ".if" file not updated, and therefore server startup 
> fails later on from the persisted region data.{color}
>  
> {color:#0e101a}To avoid the above issue, we can use the existing parameter in 
> a geode that forces the server to write synchronously to the ".if" 
> file:{color}
> {code:java}
> --J=-Dgemfire.syncMetaDataWrites=true
> {code}
> {color:#0e101a}This parameter is not mentioned anywhere in the documentation. 
> So it would be good to add it to the following document:{color}
> {color:#0e101a}[https://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/114/managing/disk_storage/managing_disk_buffer_flushes.html]{color}
>  
> {color:#0e101a}Changing this parameter's default value to true would also be 
> good. {color}{color:#0e101a}This parameter should not affect performance as 
> the ".if" file is not updated frequently.{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10412) Destry region command doesn't clear the region related expired tombstones

2022-08-26 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10412:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Destry region command doesn't clear the region related expired tombstones
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10412
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10412
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jakov Varenina
>Assignee: Jakov Varenina
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Tombstones in geode are kept on two maps: expiredTombstones and tombstones 
> (non-expired ones). When a region is destroyed, it must clear all the related 
> expired and non-expired tombstones from memory. Due to the below code bug, 
> expired tombstones aren't cleared when non-expired tombstones are available 
> during the region destruction:
> {code:java}
> private boolean removeIf(Predicate predicate) {      
>   return removeUnexpiredIf(predicate) || removeExpiredIf(predicate);    
> }
> {code}
> Because of the above, non-expired tombstones are never removed from memory, 
> preventing other tombstones from being cleared. Since other tombstones never 
> expire, the compaction is not done, and therefore the disk is filled, causing 
> the issues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10409) Rebalance Model Missing Collocated Regions At Server Startup

2022-08-25 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10409:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Rebalance Model Missing Collocated Regions At Server Startup
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10409
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Weijie Xu
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
> Attachments: server2.log, test.tar.gz
>
>
> Following steps reproduce the issue:
> Run the start.gfsh in the attached example, which configures a geode system 
> with a partitioned region, a gateway sender and a collocated region with the 
> partitioned region. So there are three regions totally, the leader region, 
> the collcated region and the queue region.
> Then run the example code, which will source ~400M data and 5 times amount of 
> events into the system.
> Then stop one of the server, and revoke the disk file of the server.
> Then start the server, which will trigger a bucket recovery.
> From the attached log line596, line598 and line5958, we can see that the 
> queue region is not included in the rebalance model, either in the data size 
> colum nor in the max size colum.
> Then do a manual rebalance after the server is up, this time log shows the 
> queue region is added to the model.(line6010, line6012, lin6014 and line6028)
>  
> The inconsistent behavior will lead to 2 negative results:
> 1) Different result of rebalance between server startup phase and manual 
> trigger, startup rebalance tells everything is OK, rebalance finished, but 
> manual trigger rebalance tells space not enough since it included the queue 
> region into the model which has 5 times data size as the leader region.
> 2) A dismatch between the rebalance model and the actual data being 
> rebalanced(Actually the queue region data is rebalanced although the region 
> is not included in the model at server startup phase).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10411) XSS vulnerabiltiy in Pulse data browser

2022-08-25 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10411:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> XSS vulnerabiltiy in Pulse data browser
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10411
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10411
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: pulse
>Affects Versions: 1.12.9, 1.12.10, 1.14.4, 1.14.5, 1.15.0, 1.15.1, 1.16.0
>Reporter: Joris Melchior
>Assignee: Joris Melchior
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> # Description:
> Stored XSS via data injection into Geode database, the injected
> payload eventually gets executed on Pulse web application when the
> admin querying data from Geode.
> # PoC:
> Step 1: With Geode up and running, run gfsh command to get into
> interactive mode:
>    shell$ gfsh
> Step 2: In gfsh console, execute the following command to insert a
> data entry into regionA (assume that regionA is created before). Note
> that the value of this data entry contains JavaScript code:
>    gfsh> put --region=regionA --key="test" --value="alert(1)"
> Step 3: Open browser to query editor of Pulse web application at
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.93.153%3A7070%2Fpulse%2FdataBrowser.htmldata=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7Cc06e6de8d92c4519303708da54fa7d03%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637915732081233095%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=ykaOkxe1hlaE7xl8XQNgBQz2%2Ful1QPxrUChoBkuaeyY%3Dreserved=0
>  (assume that already
> logged in as admin), execute the following query:
> SELECT * FROM /regionA
> Step 4: Data from regionA will be retrieved, the XSS payload
> eventually get executed
> # Why this is an issue?
> Developer maybe saves user-controlled data to Geode database, users
> maybe submit data via an arbitrary client application (for example, a
> web application), the use of gfsh console just simplifies the PoC.
> # IMPACT:
> Exploiting this XSS vulnerability, an attacker can steal the admin's
> session cookie, therefore take over the admin account.
> # CVSS: 7.6 HIGH
> (https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.first.org%2Fcvss%2Fcalculator%2F3.0%23CVSS%3A3.0%2FAV%3AN%2FAC%3AL%2FPR%3AN%2FUI%3AR%2FS%3AU%2FC%3AH%2FI%3AL%2FA%3ALdata=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7Cc06e6de8d92c4519303708da54fa7d03%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637915732081233095%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=W5dDA8kMdT1IVeUVX6mhWHhZ2HnAZbXErEB%2F0Tjs5hg%3Dreserved=0
>  )
> (re-calculate if not correct)
> # Fix:
> The Pulse web application must URL encode data retrieved from Geode database.
> # Credit:
> The issue is found by Nguyen Thai Hung (@nth347), Viettel Cyber Security.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10400) Function execution triggering internal exception

2022-08-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10400:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Function execution triggering internal exception
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a cluster with at least 3 members
> *AND* a partitioned region with 1 redundant-copy
> *AND* a server function called *JustAFunction* with isHA=false, 
> hasResult=true, optimizeForWrite=true
> *AND* a native client configured to connect to the above cluster with a pool 
> using PR-Single-Hop=true
> *WHEN* *JustAFunction* is executed with onRegion and no filters
> *IF* the client has partial metadata due to the cluster starting up or a 
> rebalance occurring
> *THEN* and exception of type 
> *"org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException:
>  Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation"* is thrown by one of 
> the servers
> ---
> *Additional information.* Currently, in geode-native whenever the metadata 
> information is incomplete, and the user tries to execute the server function 
> with onRegion and no filters, a request of type 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION_SINGLE_HOP is sent to each node.
> But the issue is that bucket partition used by the client is incorrect, 
> leading consequently to the mentioned exception.
> *Potential solution.* The potential solution would be to detect that the 
> metadata is incomplete before actually executing the function and send a 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION request to one of the cluster nodes instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10400) Function execution triggering internal exception

2022-08-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17583483#comment-17583483
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10400:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/982

- Whenever execution server functions with isHA=false, hasResult=true
  and optimizeForWrite=true, if the metadata is incomplete a request of
  type EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION_SINGLE_HOP is sent with an invalid
  bucket set partition. This causes an
  InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException exception
- In order to solve this issue, now, whenever calling
  groupByServerToBuckets, if there isn't a valid location for one of
  the buckets, it returns nullptr, triggering the fallback mechanism
  which would be sending EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION to one of the nodes
  instead.




> Function execution triggering internal exception
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10400
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage
>
> *GIVEN* a cluster with at least 3 members
> *AND* a partitioned region with 1 redundant-copy
> *AND* a server function called *JustAFunction* with isHA=false, 
> hasResult=true, optimizeForWrite=true
> *AND* a native client configured to connect to the above cluster with a pool 
> using PR-Single-Hop=true
> *WHEN* *JustAFunction* is executed with onRegion and no filters
> *IF* the client has partial metadata due to the cluster starting up or a 
> rebalance occurring
> *THEN* and exception of type 
> *"org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException:
>  Multiple target nodes found for single hop operation"* is thrown by one of 
> the servers
> ---
> *Additional information.* Currently, in geode-native whenever the metadata 
> information is incomplete, and the user tries to execute the server function 
> with onRegion and no filters, a request of type 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION_SINGLE_HOP is sent to each node.
> But the issue is that bucket partition used by the client is incorrect, 
> leading consequently to the mentioned exception.
> *Potential solution.* The potential solution would be to detect that the 
> metadata is incomplete before actually executing the function and send a 
> EXECUTE_REGION_FUNCTION request to one of the cluster nodes instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10402) Fix FunctionException handling

2022-08-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10402:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Fix FunctionException handling
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10402
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a ServerFunction throwing a FunctionException
> *WHEN* its executed
> *THEN* a CacheServerException is thrown rather FunctionException
> 
> *Additional info.* FunctionException seems not to be handled, that's why the 
> default handling exception is thrown by the native API, CacheServerException



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10402) Fix FunctionException handling

2022-08-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17583458#comment-17583458
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10402:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/981

- Fixed handling for FunctionException.
- Added InternalFunctionInvocationTargetException and replaced
  GF_FUNCTION_EXCEPTION by
  GF_INTERNAL_FUNCTION_INVOCATION_TARGET_EXCEPTION, so function
  exceptions are properly handled.
- Code modified to adapt to the above changes.




> Fix FunctionException handling
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10402
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage
>
> *GIVEN* a ServerFunction throwing a FunctionException
> *WHEN* its executed
> *THEN* a CacheServerException is thrown rather FunctionException
> 
> *Additional info.* FunctionException seems not to be handled, that's why the 
> default handling exception is thrown by the native API, CacheServerException



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-08-18 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17581203#comment-17581203
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


albertogpz merged PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970




> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-08-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17580904#comment-17580904
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


albertogpz commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r948236611


##
cppcache/src/StreamDataInput.cpp:
##
@@ -60,9 +58,7 @@ void StreamDataInput::readDataIfNotAvailable(size_t size) {
 .c_str(),
 std::chrono::duration_cast(timeSpent)
 .count(),
-std::chrono::duration_cast(
-remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_)
-.count());
+remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_.count());
 
 if (remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_ <= std::chrono::milliseconds ::zero()) {

Review Comment:
   Weird...





> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-08-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17580897#comment-17580897
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


pivotal-jbarrett commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r948230496


##
cppcache/src/StreamDataInput.cpp:
##
@@ -60,9 +58,7 @@ void StreamDataInput::readDataIfNotAvailable(size_t size) {
 .c_str(),
 std::chrono::duration_cast(timeSpent)
 .count(),
-std::chrono::duration_cast(
-remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_)
-.count());
+remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_.count());
 
 if (remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_ <= std::chrono::milliseconds ::zero()) {

Review Comment:
   Surprised the formatter didn't catch this but what's with the space between 
milliseconds and zero?





> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-08-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17580847#comment-17580847
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


pivotal-jbarrett commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r948127352


##
cppcache/src/StreamDataInput.cpp:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include "StreamDataInput.hpp"
+
+#include 
+
+#include "Utils.hpp"
+#include "util/Log.hpp"
+
+namespace apache {
+namespace geode {
+namespace client {
+
+const size_t kBufferSize = 3000;
+
+StreamDataInput::StreamDataInput(std::chrono::milliseconds timeout,
+ std::unique_ptr connector,
+ const CacheImpl* cache, Pool* pool)
+: DataInput(nullptr, 0, cache, pool),
+  connector_(std::move(connector)),
+  remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_(timeout) {}
+
+void StreamDataInput::readDataIfNotAvailable(size_t size) {
+  char buff[kBufferSize];
+  while (getBytesRemaining() < size) {
+const auto start = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
+
+const auto receivedLength = connector_->receive_nothrowiftimeout(
+buff, kBufferSize,
+std::chrono::duration_cast(
+remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_));

Review Comment:
   The duration cast can go away now that all time is milliseconds.





> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10404) Fix compilation for Java 11

2022-08-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17580615#comment-17580615
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10404:


albertogpz merged PR #980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/980




> Fix compilation for Java 11
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10404
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> It seems that after merging 
> [#973|https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/973], compilation with 
> Geode Native Docker build image for version 1.15.0 is broken. This is the 
> compilation error:
> {noformat}
> tests/javaobject/ComparePdxInstanceFunction.java:42: error: unmappable 
> character (0xAC) for encoding US-ASCII
> pdxInstanceFactory.writeString("utfHugeField", longString + "???");
> {noformat}
> As it seems, the latest docker image is using Java 11, which handles UTF-8 
> strings in a different way to Java 8, so that's why compilation is working 
> with packer images and not with Docker build image.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10408) Improvre data incosistency after failed offline compaction

2022-08-16 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10408:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Improvre data incosistency after failed offline compaction
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10408
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10408
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: persistence, regions
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> We have cluster with 3 servers and configured partitioned persistent 
> redundant region. Region if filled with data. We stop one server, and perform 
> offline compaction. While compaction is ongoing, that process is interrupted. 
> When that server is started, data incosistency is observed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10292) Upgrade boost to 1.79.0

2022-08-14 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579518#comment-17579518
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10292:


moleske commented on PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/967#issuecomment-1214594738

   Probably not anytime soon as I haven't made time to to figure out this 
problem.  Will close the PR since I'm not making progress on it




> Upgrade boost to 1.79.0
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10292
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Upgrade boost to 1.79.0 as first step in supporting visual studio 2022



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10292) Upgrade boost to 1.79.0

2022-08-14 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579519#comment-17579519
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10292:


moleske closed pull request #967: GEODE-10292: Bump to boost 1.79.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/967




> Upgrade boost to 1.79.0
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10292
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Upgrade boost to 1.79.0 as first step in supporting visual studio 2022



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10292) Upgrade boost to 1.79.0

2022-08-14 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17579509#comment-17579509
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10292:


ebluo commented on PR #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/967#issuecomment-1214578619

   Hello Michael,
   
   Any plan when this will be merged? Thanks!




> Upgrade boost to 1.79.0
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10292
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Michael Oleske
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Upgrade boost to 1.79.0 as first step in supporting visual studio 2022



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10407) java.lang.LinkageError: loader org.apache.geode.internal.DeployJarChildFirstClassLoader @2b0a05b0 attempted duplicate class definition for org.apache.kafka.common.KafkaE

2022-08-07 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10407:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> java.lang.LinkageError: loader 
> org.apache.geode.internal.DeployJarChildFirstClassLoader @2b0a05b0 attempted 
> duplicate class definition for org.apache.kafka.common.KafkaException
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10407
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: configuration, gfsh
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> When creating region with CacheListener, LinkageError error is detected



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10405) Offline server want start if gateway senders were restarted with clean queue option

2022-08-04 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10405:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Offline server want start if gateway senders were restarted with clean queue 
> option
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10405
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10405
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: persistence, regions, wan
>Reporter: Mario Ivanac
>Assignee: Mario Ivanac
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In case gateway senders were restarted with "clean queue" option, while 
> server was offline, if we want to start offline server, it will fail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10404) Fix compilation for Java 11

2022-08-02 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17574170#comment-17574170
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10404:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/980

- After merging #973, javaobject compilation was broken for Java 11.
  The build passed since packer images uses Java 8, but as docker build
  images uses Java 11, compilation is failing there.
- Root cause of the compilation issue is the difference in UTF-8 string
  handling between Java 8 and Java 11.
- So, the issue was fixed by using unicode hexcode codepoint
  characters, rather than the actual codepoint.




> Fix compilation for Java 11
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10404
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage
>
> It seems that after merging 
> [#973|https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/973], compilation with 
> Geode Native Docker build image for version 1.15.0 is broken. This is the 
> compilation error:
> {noformat}
> tests/javaobject/ComparePdxInstanceFunction.java:42: error: unmappable 
> character (0xAC) for encoding US-ASCII
> pdxInstanceFactory.writeString("utfHugeField", longString + "???");
> {noformat}
> As it seems, the latest docker image is using Java 11, which handles UTF-8 
> strings in a different way to Java 8, so that's why compilation is working 
> with packer images and not with Docker build image.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10404) Fix compilation for Java 11

2022-08-02 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10404:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Fix compilation for Java 11
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10404
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> It seems that after merging 
> [#973|https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/973], compilation with 
> Geode Native Docker build image for version 1.15.0 is broken. This is the 
> compilation error:
> {noformat}
> tests/javaobject/ComparePdxInstanceFunction.java:42: error: unmappable 
> character (0xAC) for encoding US-ASCII
> pdxInstanceFactory.writeString("utfHugeField", longString + "???");
> {noformat}
> As it seems, the latest docker image is using Java 11, which handles UTF-8 
> strings in a different way to Java 8, so that's why compilation is working 
> with packer images and not with Docker build image.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10403) Distributed deadlock when stopping gateway sender

2022-07-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10403:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> Distributed deadlock when stopping gateway sender
> -
>
> Key: GEODE-10403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10403
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: wan
>Affects Versions: 1.12.9, 1.13.8, 1.14.4, 1.15.0
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> A distributed deadlock has been found during some tests of a Geode system 
> with WAN replication when stopping the gateway sender while sending a fair 
> amount of operations to the servers.
> The distributed deadlock manifests in the gateway sender stop command hanging 
> forever and by all normal Geode operations from clients (gets, puts,...) not 
> being responded.
> The situation is provoked by the Gateway sender stop command that first takes 
> the lifecycle lock and then, at a given point, tries to retrieve the size of 
> the gateway sender. This operation, that requires communication with the 
> other peers never finishes, probably because the response from one of the 
> peers is never received.
> Another thread is blocked when trying to acquire the lifecycle lock in 
> AbstractGatewaySender.distribute().
> Finally many threads handling Geode operations (get, put...) get blocked in 
> the DistributedCacheOperation._distribute() call waiting for a response from 
> another peer.
> Thread dump section from blocked gateway sender stop command in call to get 
> size of queue:
> {{"ConcurrentParallelGatewaySenderEventProcessor Stopper Thread1" #1316 
> daemon prio=10 os_prio=0 cpu=45.55ms elapsed=4152.76s tid=0x7f92bc1c2000 
> nid=0x2154 waiting on condition  [0x7f9179cd2000]}}
> {{   java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking)}}
> {{        at jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(java.base@11.0.11/Native Method)}}
> {{        - parking to wait for  <0x00031ca2be50> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch$Sync)}}
> {{        at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(java.base@11.0.11/LockSupport.java:234)}}
> {{        at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(java.base@11.0.11/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1079)}}
> {{        at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(java.base@11.0.11/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1369)}}
> {{        at 
> java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(java.base@11.0.11/CountDownLatch.java:278)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.util.concurrent.StoppableCountDownLatch.await(StoppableCountDownLatch.java:72)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.ReplyProcessor21.basicWait(ReplyProcessor21.java:731)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.ReplyProcessor21.waitForRepliesUninterruptibly(ReplyProcessor21.java:802)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.ReplyProcessor21.waitForRepliesUninterruptibly(ReplyProcessor21.java:779)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.ReplyProcessor21.waitForRepliesUninterruptibly(ReplyProcessor21.java:865)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.partitioned.SizeMessage$SizeResponse.waitBucketSizes(SizeMessage.java:344)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.getSizeRemotely(PartitionedRegion.java:6758)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.entryCount(PartitionedRegion.java:6709)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.entryCount(PartitionedRegion.java:6691)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.getRegionSize(PartitionedRegion.java:6663)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.LocalRegionDataView.entryCount(LocalRegionDataView.java:99)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.LocalRegion.entryCount(LocalRegion.java:2078)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.LocalRegion.size(LocalRegion.java:8301)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.wan.parallel.ParallelGatewaySenderQueue.size(ParallelGatewaySenderQueue.java:1670)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.wan.AbstractGatewaySenderEventProcessor.closeProcessor(AbstractGatewaySenderEventProcessor.java:1259)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.wan.AbstractGatewaySenderEventProcessor.stopProcessing(AbstractGatewaySenderEventProcessor.java:1247)}}
> {{        at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.wan.AbstractGatewaySenderEventProcessor$SenderStopperCallable.call(AbstractGatewaySenderEventProcessor.java:1399)}}
> {{        at 
> 

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10401) Oplog recovery takes too long due to fault in fastutil library

2022-07-27 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10401:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Oplog recovery takes too long due to fault in fastutil library
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10401
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10401
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Jakov Varenina
>Assignee: Jakov Varenina
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {color:#0e101a}As we already know, the .drf file delete operations only 
> contain OplogEntryID. During recovery, the server reads (byte by byte) each 
> OplogEntryID and stores it in a HashSet to use later when recovering .crf 
> files. There are two types of HashSets: IntOpenHashSet and LongOpenHashSet. 
> The OplogEntryID of type 
> {color}_{color:#0e101a}integer{color}_{color:#0e101a} will be stored in 
> IntOpenHashSet, and {color}_{color:#0e101a}long 
> integer{color}_{color:#0e101a} in LongOpenHashSet, probably due to memory 
> optimization and performance factors. OplogEntryID starts with a zero and 
> increments throughout time.
> {color}
> {color:#0e101a}We have observed in logs that between exception (There is a 
> large number of deleted entries) and the previous log have passed more than 4 
> minutes (sometimes even more).{color}
> {code:java}
> {"timestamp":"2022-06-14T21:41:43.772+08:00","severity":"info","message":"Recovering
>  oplog#271 /opt/dbservice/data/datastore/BACKUPdataDiskStore_271.drf for disk 
> store dataDiskStore.","metadata":
> {"timestamp":"2022-06-14T21:46:02.152+08:00","severity":"warning","message":"There
>  is a large number of deleted entries within the disk-store, please execute 
> an offline
> compaction.","metadata":
> {code}
> {color:#0e101a}When the above exception occurs, that means that the limit of 
> {color}_{color:#0e101a}805306401{color}_{color:#0e101a} entries in 
> IntOpenHashSet has been reached. In that case, the server rolls to the new 
> IntOpenHashSet, where an exception and the delay could happen again.{color}
> {color:#0e101a}The problem is that due to the fault in FastUtil dependency 
> (IntOpenHashSet and LongOpenHashSet), the unnecessary rehashing happens 
> multiple times before the max size is reached. The{color} 
> _{color:#0e101a}rehashing starts from{color}_ {color:#0e101a}805306368 
> onwards for each new entry until the max size. This rehashing adds several 
> minutes to .drf Oplog recovery, but does nothing as max is already 
> reached.{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-07-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17564899#comment-17564899
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


albertogpz commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r917731818


##
cppcache/src/StreamDataInput.cpp:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include "StreamDataInput.hpp"
+
+#include 
+
+#include "Utils.hpp"
+#include "util/Log.hpp"
+
+namespace apache {
+namespace geode {
+namespace client {
+
+const size_t kBufferSize = 3000;
+
+StreamDataInput::StreamDataInput(std::chrono::milliseconds timeout,
+ std::unique_ptr connector,
+ const CacheImpl* cache, Pool* pool)
+: DataInput(nullptr, 0, cache, pool),
+  connector_(std::move(connector)),
+  remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_(timeout) {}
+
+void StreamDataInput::readDataIfNotAvailable(size_t size) {
+  char buff[kBufferSize];
+  while (getBytesRemaining() < size) {
+const auto start = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
+
+const auto receivedLength = connector_->receive_nothrowiftimeout(
+buff, kBufferSize,
+std::chrono::duration_cast(
+remainingTimeBeforeTimeout_));

Review Comment:
   Probably not. I will change it to milliseconds.





> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-07-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17564825#comment-17564825
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


albertogpz commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r917628356


##
cppcache/include/geode/DataInput.hpp:
##
@@ -502,21 +502,21 @@ class APACHE_GEODE_EXPORT DataInput {
 
   inline char readPdxChar() { return static_cast(readInt16()); }
 
-  inline void _checkBufferSize(size_t size, int32_t line) {
-if ((m_bufLength - (m_buf - m_bufHead)) < size) {
+  virtual void _checkBufferSize(size_t size, int32_t line) {

Review Comment:
   I am afraid it is necessary for the solution. But given that this will go in 
a minor release I do not think it is an issue.
   Is there a log file in place where I could add this change as proposed in: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0v2r5trv926oj8qrgfp00467y3rycsvw
   





> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-07-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17564826#comment-17564826
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


albertogpz commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r917628778


##
cppcache/include/geode/DataInput.hpp:
##
@@ -452,19 +452,19 @@ class APACHE_GEODE_EXPORT DataInput {
   DataInput& operator=(DataInput&&) = default;
 
  protected:

Review Comment:
   Not sure. Anyhow, this fix should go in a minor release so should not be an 
issue.





> C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 
> bytes
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If a locator sends a response to the C++ native client that is longer than 
> 3000 bytes the C++ native client library will only read the first 3000 bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10300) C++ Native client messages coming from the locator cannot be longer than 3000 bytes

2022-07-08 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17564394#comment-17564394
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10300:


pivotal-jbarrett commented on code in PR #970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/970#discussion_r917042197


##
cppcache/src/GetAllServersResponse.cpp:
##
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ namespace geode {
 namespace client {
 
 void GetAllServersResponse::toData(DataOutput& output) const {
-  int32_t numServers = static_cast(m_servers.size());
+  int32_t numServers = static_cast(servers_.size());

Review Comment:
   `auto`



##
cppcache/include/geode/DataInput.hpp:
##
@@ -502,21 +502,21 @@ class APACHE_GEODE_EXPORT DataInput {
 
   inline char readPdxChar() { return static_cast(readInt16()); }
 
-  inline void _checkBufferSize(size_t size, int32_t line) {
-if ((m_bufLength - (m_buf - m_bufHead)) < size) {
+  virtual void _checkBufferSize(size_t size, int32_t line) {

Review Comment:
   This is a breaking ABI change. This should only occur at a minor release. 
Are we sure this needs to change?



##
cppcache/src/StreamDataInput.cpp:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include "StreamDataInput.hpp"
+
+#include 
+
+#include "Utils.hpp"
+#include "util/Log.hpp"
+
+namespace apache {
+namespace geode {
+namespace client {
+
+const size_t kBufferSize = 3000;

Review Comment:
   `constexpr`



##
cppcache/test/StreamDataInputTest.cpp:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#include 
+
+#include "CacheImpl.hpp"
+#include "Connector.hpp"
+#include "GetAllServersResponse.hpp"
+#include "ServerLocation.hpp"
+#include "StreamDataInput.hpp"
+#include "geode/DataOutput.hpp"
+#include "mock/ConnectorMock.hpp"
+
+namespace {
+
+using apache::geode::client::CacheImpl;
+using apache::geode::client::Connector;
+using apache::geode::client::ConnectorMock;
+using apache::geode::client::DataOutput;
+using apache::geode::client::GetAllServersResponse;
+using apache::geode::client::Serializable;
+using apache::geode::client::ServerLocation;
+using apache::geode::client::StreamDataInput;
+using apache::geode::client::TimeoutException;
+
+using ::testing::_;
+using ::testing::DoAll;
+using ::testing::Eq;
+using ::testing::Return;
+using ::testing::SetArrayArgument;
+using ::testing::SizeIs;
+
+const size_t kReadBuffSize = 3000;

Review Comment:
   `constexpr`



##
cppcache/include/geode/DataInput.hpp:
##
@@ -452,19 +452,19 @@ class APACHE_GEODE_EXPORT DataInput {
   DataInput& operator=(DataInput&&) = default;
 
  protected:
+  const uint8_t* buf_;

Review Comment:
   Love the update to the current naming convention but please also update to 
full words too.



##
cppcache/src/StreamDataInput.cpp:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10398) TotalBucketCount are not updated after restart

2022-07-08 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10398:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> TotalBucketCount are not updated after restart
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10398
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10398
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: statistics
>Affects Versions: 1.13.8, 1.14.4, 1.15.0
>Reporter: Mario Kevo
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> Steps to reproduce the issue:
>  # start locator and 4 servers(static sampling enabled)
>  # create disk stores for gw sender and region
>  # create parallel gw sender with disk store
>  # create the region with gw sender and disk store
>  # initialize buckets
>  # shutdown servers
>  # get up all servers
>  # check the member stats
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10076) Fix string codepoint detection

2022-07-08 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17564170#comment-17564170
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10076:


albertogpz merged PR #973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/973




> Fix string codepoint detection
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10076
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10076
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* a PdxSerializable implementation with a string field
> *WHEN* an ASCII string is written
> *THEN* the string is serialized with the DSCode CacheableString
> 
> *Additional information.* In the Java client, whenever writing an string, the 
> string is parsed and the DSCode is assigned depending on the string 
> codification. In the native client, it's always set to CacheableString, 
> whenever for example in the case of an ASCII string should be 
> CacheableASCIIString
> Also I've noticed the following scenario requires to fix the codepoint 
> detection:
> # From a native client, I create an object using a PdxSerializable 
> implementation, which has an String field. 
> # After that, we are reading this object from a java client which cache has 
> readPdxSerialized=true and comparing it with a PdxInstance created locally 
> inside the Java client.
> # As PdxInstanceImpl.equals method uses rawBytes for strings, if the string 
> is serialized using different DSCodes, the comparison will fail, even if the 
> length and content are the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10371) C++ Native client: Improve dispersion on connections expiration

2022-07-06 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17562995#comment-17562995
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10371:


albertogpz merged PR #974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/974




> C++ Native client: Improve dispersion on connections expiration
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-10371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10371
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> The dispersion on connections expirations in the C++ native client works in 
> such a way that it adds a dispersion (variance) between -9% and 9% over the 
> time for a connection to expire due to load-conditioning so that, in the 
> event of having many connections being created at the same, they do not 
> expire at the right exact time.
> Nevertheless, the current implementation has two problems:
> - The randomness of the variance depends on the current time in seconds. As a 
> result, for connections created in the same second, the variance will be the 
> same and, therefore, the expiration time too.
> - The randomness is created using the C standard's library "rand()" function 
> which is considered not secure.
> It is recommended to change the library used to generate the random variance 
> to a secure one and also to make sure that for the time in seconds it does 
> not return the same variance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10396) IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint disconnection

2022-07-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17562504#comment-17562504
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10396:


gaussianrecurrence opened a new pull request, #977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/977

- Currently whenever a server function is executed on a region with no
  filter, if an IllegalStateException wrapped within a
  FunctionException is thrown inside the server fuction body, then
  the endpoint's connections are closed, given the client considers the
  endpoint is failing.
- In order to solve this, now it's checked if the exception is wrapped
  into a FunctionException before triggering the endpoint disconnection
  mechanism.
- A new IT has been added to verify the behavior.




> IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint 
> disconnection
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage
>
> *GIVEN* A cluster of 3 servers and a client with a pool pointing to those 3 
> servers
>*AND* configured with PR-Singl-Hop = true
> *WHEN* A server function is executed with onRegion and with a filter
>*AND* it throws an IllegalServerException wrapped within a 
> FunctionExceution in the body
> *THEN* the native client thinks there is an isue with the node and closes all 
> the endpoint's connections.
> ---
> *IT IS TO BE EXPECTED* That given that the exception is wrapped inside a 
> FunctionException this should be ignored by the endpoint failure detection 
> mechanism that native client has into place.
> *AS ADDITIONAL INFO* Currently, the exception chain relationship info is not 
> read by the native client, as it's serialized using Java serialization format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10396) IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint disconnection

2022-07-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10396:
---
Labels: needsTriage pull-request-available  (was: needsTriage)

> IllegalStateException wrapped within FunctionException triggers endpoint 
> disconnection
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10396
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: native client
>Reporter: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Assignee: Mario Salazar de Torres
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: needsTriage, pull-request-available
>
> *GIVEN* A cluster of 3 servers and a client with a pool pointing to those 3 
> servers
>*AND* configured with PR-Singl-Hop = true
> *WHEN* A server function is executed with onRegion and with a filter
>*AND* it throws an IllegalServerException wrapped within a 
> FunctionExceution in the body
> *THEN* the native client thinks there is an isue with the node and closes all 
> the endpoint's connections.
> ---
> *IT IS TO BE EXPECTED* That given that the exception is wrapped inside a 
> FunctionException this should be ignored by the endpoint failure detection 
> mechanism that native client has into place.
> *AS ADDITIONAL INFO* Currently, the exception chain relationship info is not 
> read by the native client, as it's serialized using Java serialization format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10089) release 1.15.0

2022-07-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17562455#comment-17562455
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10089:


onichols-pivotal merged PR #976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/976




> release 1.15.0
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10089
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: release
>Reporter: Owen Nichols
>Assignee: Owen Nichols
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> As per [Jan 25 dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/s9mpd207h40crcr76fpdfmohdchgdqog], 
> support/1.15 was cut with the intention of stabilizing and releasing a new 
> Geode minor.
> UPDATE: As per [Mar 16 dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/twlwzcvmx2kqw15whpmxkh2h8bmrok21], 
> support/1.15 was retracted.  Work will continue on develop with an eye toward 
> re-cutting support/1.15 in ~June
> UPDATE: support/1.15 was re-cut on May 9 with an eye toward shipping in mid 
> to late June (2022).
> Release status information is also updated in the Geode [Release 
> Schedule|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Schedule].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10089) release 1.15.0

2022-07-05 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17562451#comment-17562451
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10089:


gaussianrecurrence commented on PR #976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/976#issuecomment-1174754568

   Hi :)
   Is there any plans to get this merged? I thought this needed to be merged 
before releasing 1.15.0 :S




> release 1.15.0
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10089
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: release
>Reporter: Owen Nichols
>Assignee: Owen Nichols
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> As per [Jan 25 dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/s9mpd207h40crcr76fpdfmohdchgdqog], 
> support/1.15 was cut with the intention of stabilizing and releasing a new 
> Geode minor.
> UPDATE: As per [Mar 16 dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/twlwzcvmx2kqw15whpmxkh2h8bmrok21], 
> support/1.15 was retracted.  Work will continue on develop with an eye toward 
> re-cutting support/1.15 in ~June
> UPDATE: support/1.15 was re-cut on May 9 with an eye toward shipping in mid 
> to late June (2022).
> Release status information is also updated in the Geode [Release 
> Schedule|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Schedule].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10344) Send alert when thread stuck for longer than configured time

2022-07-04 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10344:
---
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Send alert when thread stuck for longer than configured time
> 
>
> Key: GEODE-10344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10344
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: management
>Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> As per RFC 
> [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Management+of+threads+stuck+for+a+long+time+in+Geode],
>  it is proposed to send an alert when a thread in a member has been stuck for 
> a maximum configurable value.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-9402) Automatic Reconnect Failure: Address already in use

2022-06-23 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-9402:
--
Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Automatic Reconnect Failure: Address already in use
> ---
>
> Key: GEODE-9402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9402
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: membership
>Reporter: Juan Ramos
>Assignee: Jianxia Chen
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: cluster_logs_gke_latest_54.zip, cluster_logs_pks_121.zip
>
>
> There are 2 locators and 4 servers during the test, once they're all up and 
> running the test drops the network connectivity between all members to 
> generate a full network partition and cause all members to shutdown and go 
> into reconnect mode. Upon reaching the mentioned state, the test 
> automatically restores the network connectivity and expects all members to 
> automatically go up again and re-form the distributed system.
>  This works fine most of the time, and we see every member successfully 
> reconnecting to the distributed system:
> {noformat}
> [info 2021/06/23 15:58:12.981 GMT gemfire-cluster-locator-0  
> tid=0x87] Reconnect completed.
> [info 2021/06/23 15:58:14.726 GMT gemfire-cluster-locator-1  
> tid=0x86] Reconnect completed.
> [info 2021/06/23 15:58:46.702 GMT gemfire-cluster-server-0  
> tid=0x94] Reconnect completed.
> [info 2021/06/23 15:58:46.485 GMT gemfire-cluster-server-1  
> tid=0x96] Reconnect completed.
> [info 2021/06/23 15:58:46.273 GMT gemfire-cluster-server-2  
> tid=0x97] Reconnect completed.
> [info 2021/06/23 15:58:46.902 GMT gemfire-cluster-server-3  
> tid=0x95] Reconnect completed.
> {noformat}
> In some rare occasions, though, one of the servers fails during the reconnect 
> phase with the following exception:
> {noformat}
> [error 2021/06/09 18:48:52.872 GMT gemfire-cluster-server-1  
> tid=0x91] Cache initialization for GemFireCache[id = 575310555; isClosing = 
> false; isShutDownAll = false; created = Wed Jun 09 18:46:49 GMT 2021; server 
> = false; copyOnRead = false; lockLease = 120; lockTimeout = 60] failed 
> because:
> org.apache.geode.GemFireIOException: While starting cache server CacheServer 
> on port=40404 client subscription config policy=none client subscription 
> config capacity=1 client subscription config overflow directory=.
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.xmlcache.CacheCreation.startCacheServers(CacheCreation.java:800)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.xmlcache.CacheCreation.create(CacheCreation.java:599)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.xmlcache.CacheXmlParser.create(CacheXmlParser.java:339)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.GemFireCacheImpl.loadCacheXml(GemFireCacheImpl.java:4207)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.ClusterConfigurationLoader.applyClusterXmlConfiguration(ClusterConfigurationLoader.java:197)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.GemFireCacheImpl.applyJarAndXmlFromClusterConfig(GemFireCacheImpl.java:1497)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.GemFireCacheImpl.initialize(GemFireCacheImpl.java:1449)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.InternalCacheBuilder.create(InternalCacheBuilder.java:191)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.InternalDistributedSystem.reconnect(InternalDistributedSystem.java:2668)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.InternalDistributedSystem.tryReconnect(InternalDistributedSystem.java:2426)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.InternalDistributedSystem.disconnect(InternalDistributedSystem.java:1277)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.ClusterDistributionManager$DMListener.membershipFailure(ClusterDistributionManager.java:2315)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.membership.gms.GMSMembership.uncleanShutdown(GMSMembership.java:1183)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.membership.gms.GMSMembership$ManagerImpl.lambda$forceDisconnect$0(GMSMembership.java:1807)
>   at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use (Bind failed)
>   at java.base/java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method)
>   at 
> java.base/java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.bind(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:436)
>   at java.base/java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:395)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.net.SCClusterSocketCreator.createServerSocket(SCClusterSocketCreator.java:70)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.net.SocketCreator.createServerSocket(SocketCreator.java:529)
>   at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.AcceptorImpl.(AcceptorImpl.java:573)
>   at 
> 

[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-10089) release 1.15.0

2022-06-22 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17557689#comment-17557689
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-10089:


onichols-pivotal opened a new pull request, #976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/976

   Native client hardcodes Geode version to test with in several places.
   Update those variables to latest-and-greatest apache-geode 1.15.0




> release 1.15.0
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10089
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: release
>Reporter: Owen Nichols
>Assignee: Owen Nichols
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> As per [Jan 25 dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/s9mpd207h40crcr76fpdfmohdchgdqog], 
> support/1.15 was cut with the intention of stabilizing and releasing a new 
> Geode minor.
> UPDATE: As per [Mar 16 dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/twlwzcvmx2kqw15whpmxkh2h8bmrok21], 
> support/1.15 was retracted.  Work will continue on develop with an eye toward 
> re-cutting support/1.15 in ~June
> UPDATE: support/1.15 was re-cut on May 9 with an eye toward shipping in mid 
> to late June (2022).
> Release status information is also updated in the Geode [Release 
> Schedule|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Schedule].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)


[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-10364) DeploymentManagementRedployDUnitTest.hotDeployShouldNotResultInAnyFailedFunctionExecutions

2022-06-22 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-10364:
---
Labels: blocks-1.16.0 pull-request-available  (was: blocks-1.16.0)

> DeploymentManagementRedployDUnitTest.hotDeployShouldNotResultInAnyFailedFunctionExecutions
> --
>
> Key: GEODE-10364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10364
> Project: Geode
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: management, rest (admin), tests
>Affects Versions: 1.15.0
>Reporter: Udo Kohlmeyer
>Assignee: Jinmei Liao
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: blocks-1.16.0, pull-request-available
>
> DeploymentManagementRedployDUnitTest.hotDeployShouldNotResultInAnyFailedFunctionExecutions
>  is failing with unexpected log entries.
> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-develop-mass-test-run/jobs/distributed-test-openjdk8/builds/2671
> {code:java}
> DeploymentManagementRedployDUnitTest > 
> hotDeployShouldNotResultInAnyFailedFunctionExecutions FAILED
> 01:44:15java.lang.AssertionError: Suspicious strings were written to the 
> log during this run.
> 01:44:15Fix the strings or use IgnoredException.addIgnoredException to 
> ignore.
> 01:44:15
> ---
> 01:44:15Found suspect string in 'dunit_suspect-vm0.log' at line 531
> 01:44:15
> 01:44:15
> PK{}?T)???DeployCommandRedeployDUnitFunctionA.class???n?@??IhChh?:??Bp+B??E
>  
> EP5P$n??J?r?h?F?g???P9?? 01:44:15??`?2??G??%%?^
> 01:44:15O?C
> 01:44:15
> ??i?.w?Y???M??y;???Kdl??8u1???OZB#??k?-Nay0=??7??N+?5?^??)???*Er:F?c4]I}N?+?o???5zR?H?i?[X???[l?#?P??#??eN!:?
>  
> v?v??u?2?W?r?$?Kqu??YnS??+V}E.???j-?{?7PK??4|'?=???PK??{}?T4|'?=???)?DeployCommandRedeployDUnitFunctionA.classPK??[???j?
> 01:44:15--cvFOdAqPh74YsEftzj4GE_lSmdgeMggm6mUZS8E
> 01:44:15Content-Disposition: form-data; name="config"
> 01:44:15Content-Type: application/json
> 01:44:15
> 01:44:15
> ---
> 01:44:15Found suspect string in 'dunit_suspect-vm0.log' at line 550
> 01:44:15
> 01:44:15
> PK{}?T)???DeployCommandRedeployDUnitFunctionA.class???n?@??IhChh?:???p+B??E
>  
> EP5P$n??J?r?h?F?g???P9?? 01:44:15??`?2??G??%%?^
> 01:44:15O?C
> 01:44:15
> ??i?.w?Y???M??y;???Kdl??8u1???OZB#??k?-Nay0=??7??N+?5?^??)???*Er:F?c4]I}N?+?o???5zR?H?i?[X???[l?#?P??#??eN!:?
>  
> v?v??u?2?W?r?$?Kqu??YnS??+V}E.???j-?{?7PK??=???PK??{}?T=???)?DeployCommandRedeployDUnitFunctionA.classPK??[???j?
> 01:44:15---UjSGLHVgaMcjtjM7IJfWJ3fPZEhjOGN
> 01:44:15Content-Disposition: form-data; name="config"
> 01:44:15Content-Type: application/json {code}
> In order to resolve this issue the ManagementLoggingFilter needs to be a 
> little more discriminant on what it logs out, as it currently is serializing 
> the jar file contents as a String, which is causing this issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >