[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11084) Handle deletions and column tracking using internal filters rather than using DeleteTrackers and ColumnTrackers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15393353#comment-15393353 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-11084: May be I can this up and see if it is good to go ahead with what this JIRA intended or do as how SQM is being refactored on a case by case basis. > Handle deletions and column tracking using internal filters rather than using > DeleteTrackers and ColumnTrackers > --- > > Key: HBASE-11084 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11084 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan >Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > See HBASE-11054 for discussion. > Currently the delete tracking is done by DeleteTracker and its subclasses. > column tracking and its versions are handled inside the ColumnTrackers and > its subclasses. > This JIRA aims at providing internal filters and attaching them to > scans/gets, including minor and major compaction scans so that all the logic > of deletes and version counting goes into it rather than having trackers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11084) Handle deletions and column tracking using internal filters rather than using DeleteTrackers and ColumnTrackers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13995946#comment-13995946 ] Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-11084: - Can we detail pros of this approach? Handle deletions and column tracking using internal filters rather than using DeleteTrackers and ColumnTrackers --- Key: HBASE-11084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11084 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.99.0 See HBASE-11054 for discussion. Currently the delete tracking is done by DeleteTracker and its subclasses. column tracking and its versions are handled inside the ColumnTrackers and its subclasses. This JIRA aims at providing internal filters and attaching them to scans/gets, including minor and major compaction scans so that all the logic of deletes and version counting goes into it rather than having trackers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11084) Handle deletions and column tracking using internal filters rather than using DeleteTrackers and ColumnTrackers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985044#comment-13985044 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11084: Interesting idea! Handle deletions and column tracking using internal filters rather than using DeleteTrackers and ColumnTrackers --- Key: HBASE-11084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11084 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.99.0 See HBASE-11054 for discussion. Currently the delete tracking is done by DeleteTracker and its subclasses. column tracking and its versions are handled inside the ColumnTrackers and its subclasses. This JIRA aims at providing internal filters and attaching them to scans/gets, including minor and major compaction scans so that all the logic of deletes and version counting goes into it rather than having trackers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
