[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-03-15 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15195993#comment-15195993
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


ABORTED: Integrated in HBase-0.98-matrix #311 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98-matrix/311/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (apurtell: 
rev b248751b75fa12958e82b1d4990c34f11ab45860)
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.4, 0.98.18
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-03-15 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15195853#comment-15195853
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-0.98-on-Hadoop-1.1 #1185 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98-on-Hadoop-1.1/1185/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (apurtell: 
rev b248751b75fa12958e82b1d4990c34f11ab45860)
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.4, 0.98.18
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152545#comment-15152545
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.1-JDK7 #1666 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1-JDK7/1666/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (stack: rev 
87d91e5537460cea2321c3ef3046cac1a450cbe0)
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152494#comment-15152494
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.1-JDK8 #1753 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1-JDK8/1753/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (stack: rev 
87d91e5537460cea2321c3ef3046cac1a450cbe0)
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152201#comment-15152201
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #718 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/718/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (stack: rev 
6f8c7dca13cdbb391ada8ad9979ebc7698e44aa8)
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152133#comment-15152133
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.3 #558 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3/558/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (stack: rev 
5e7fecc15b366510a69f5479e8af13d1613ccc02)
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15152106#comment-15152106
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.2 #554 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.2/554/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (busbey: 
rev 34f852ab222f9b890479b5aaeb4a8abe38a47a8f)
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15151875#comment-15151875
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.2-IT #441 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.2-IT/441/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (busbey: 
rev 34f852ab222f9b890479b5aaeb4a8abe38a47a8f)
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15151842#comment-15151842
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15279:


SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.3-IT #505 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-IT/505/])
HBASE-15279 OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and (stack: rev 
5e7fecc15b366510a69f5479e8af13d1613ccc02)
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/OrderedBytes.java
* hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestOrderedBytes.java


> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-17 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15151813#comment-15151813
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-15279:
-

pushed to branch-1.2. waiting on RC for addendum to HBASE-15285.

> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-17 Thread Nick Dimiduk (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15151062#comment-15151062
 ] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-15279:
--

Thanks for the fix Robert. Looks like in8 and in16 were missed when HBASE-9369 
added support for them.

> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
>Assignee: Robert Yokota
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15150953#comment-15150953
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15279:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
50s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 25s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m 
25s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 3s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
26s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m 
34s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
32m 19s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 
12s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 27s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-common in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m 11s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-common in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 73m 56s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.9.1 Server=1.9.1 Image:yetus/hbase:date2016-02-17 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12788185/HBASE-15279-2.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-15279 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 728fa54611d4 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-16 Thread Robert Yokota (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15150032#comment-15150032
 ] 

Robert Yokota commented on HBASE-15279:
---

Yes, I'm using OrderedBytes.  Ok, I added a test.  I managed to find and fix 
another bug in OrderedBytes.length

> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
> Attachments: HBASE-15279-2.patch, HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15279) OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types

2016-02-16 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15149855#comment-15149855
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-15279:
---

Patch looks great. Do you have a test to go with it [~rayokota]? Are you using 
OrderedBytes?  Thanks.

> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-15279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15279
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.1.3
>Reporter: Robert Yokota
> Attachments: HBASE-15279.patch
>
>
> OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue does not check for int8 and int16 types.  This 
> also means that OrderedBytes.length may return an incorrect result, since it 
> calls OrderedBytes.isEncodedValue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)