[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-02 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15458448#comment-15458448
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-0.98-matrix #396 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98-matrix/396/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (apurtell: rev 
a7e6860f217ac3fcda396332957d7420ad93050c)
* (edit) pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-02 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15458385#comment-15458385
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-0.98-on-Hadoop-1.1 #1269 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98-on-Hadoop-1.1/1269/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (apurtell: rev 
a7e6860f217ac3fcda396332957d7420ad93050c)
* (edit) pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-02 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15458056#comment-15458056
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.1-JDK8 #1863 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1-JDK8/1863/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (apurtell: rev 
69a64d2e347746fbf37e2b7e16cb8573fab7175f)
* (edit) pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-01 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15457271#comment-15457271
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-JDK7 #20 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.2-JDK7/20/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (apurtell: rev 
0f7bfe8321481df378cee64b9949566824ff6421)
* (edit) pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-01 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15457112#comment-15457112
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-JDK8 #17 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.2-JDK8/17/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (apurtell: rev 
0f7bfe8321481df378cee64b9949566824ff6421)
* (edit) pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-01 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15456985#comment-15456985
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.1-JDK7 #1777 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1-JDK7/1777/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (apurtell: rev 
69a64d2e347746fbf37e2b7e16cb8573fab7175f)
* (edit) pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-09-01 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15456754#comment-15456754
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16340:


Pushed to 0.98, branch-1.1, and branch-1.2. I verified each change with a build 
using Hadoop 2.7.2.

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.22, 1.1.7, 1.2.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15410390#comment-15410390
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.3 #810 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3/810/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (busbey: rev 
262a4e666fce5eceb61f077c13b0e623f532598a)
* pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15410249#comment-15410249
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.3-IT #782 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-IT/782/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (busbey: rev 
262a4e666fce5eceb61f077c13b0e623f532598a)
* pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409935#comment-15409935
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16340:


FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #1360 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/1360/])
HBASE-16340 exclude Xerces iplementation jars from coming in (busbey: rev 
c59f76485e2fbb86124847c4b31a06dc53d393b8)
* pom.xml
* hbase-spark/pom.xml


> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409844#comment-15409844
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16340:
-

arg. already pushed. I'll add your signoff to the back port branches. sorry!

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409674#comment-15409674
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-16340:
---

Yes sir

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409584#comment-15409584
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16340:
-

happens on master, unrelated to this patch. looks like [~stack] is already on 
top of it in HBASE-16361.

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-05 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409575#comment-15409575
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16340:
-

nice catch by precommit. TestLogLevel is a legit failure

{code}
2016-08-04 23:03:25,776 ERROR [908999857@qtp-1526881735-0] log.Slf4jLog(87): 
Error for /logLevel
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/httpclient/URIException
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.log.LogLevel$Servlet.doGet(LogLevel.java:109)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:511)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1221)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.ClickjackingPreventionFilter.doFilter(ClickjackingPreventionFilter.java:48)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1212)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:1427)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1212)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.NoCacheFilter.doFilter(NoCacheFilter.java:49)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1212)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:399)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766)
at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:450)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152)
at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:542)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:928)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:549)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:212)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404)
at 
org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:410)
at 
org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:582)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: 
org.apache.commons.httpclient.URIException
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
... 26 more
{code}

Checking to see if it happens on master without this patch, since I'm not sure 
why removing xercesImpl would make commons-httpclient stop showing up in the 
classpath.

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch, HBASE-16340.2.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-04 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15408619#comment-15408619
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16340:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 23s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
49s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 3m 53s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 4m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_80 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 2m 
27s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 46s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_80 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 9s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m 
40s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 3m 55s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 3m 55s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 4m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_80 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 4m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 2m 
22s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
31m 39s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 47s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_80 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m 12s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-spark in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 21m 42s {color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
22s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 95m 55s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.http.log.TestLogLevel |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12822172/HBASE-16340.2.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-16340 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  xml  compile  |
| uname | Linux asf907.gq1.ygridcore.net 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / c9f84e8 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_80 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/local/jenkins/java/jdk1.8.0:1.8.0 
/usr/local/asfpackages/java/jdk1.7.0_80:1.7.0_80 |
| unit | 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-03 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15406460#comment-15406460
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16340:
-

looks like the docker image we end up using doesn't have protoc.

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-03 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15406365#comment-15406365
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16340:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  4m 
39s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 10m 
34s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m  
8s{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m 
45s{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  2m 
38s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
8s{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
37s{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  4m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  3m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  3m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
28m 12s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hbaseprotoc {color} | {color:red}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m  
8s{color} | {color:green} hbase-spark in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}110m 
36s{color} | {color:green} root in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}188m 19s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.11.2 Server=1.11.2 Image:yetus/hbase:date2016-08-03 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12821648/HBASE-16340.1.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-16340 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  xml  compile  |
| uname | Linux 05e235050bac 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-03 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15406061#comment-15406061
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16340:
-

this also needs a banned dependencies check

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-03 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15406037#comment-15406037
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16340:
-

all OOMs. looks ominous. I recall a recent builds@ email about jdk versions 
getting standardized / updated. maybe we fell afoul of something. lemme try to 
rerun.

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-02 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15404527#comment-15404527
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-16340:
---

+1

What those failures about?

> ensure no Xerces jars included
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-16340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: dependencies
>Reporter: Sean Busbey
>Assignee: Sean Busbey
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16340.1.patch
>
>
> When we moved our pom to Hadoop 2.7 we picked up a transitive Xerces 
> implementation. We should exclude this to ensure we don't get a conflict with 
> the implementation that ships with the jvm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16340) ensure no Xerces jars included

2016-08-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15404390#comment-15404390
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16340:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 12s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 2m 21s 
{color} | {color:red} root in master failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m 28s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in master failed with JDK v1.8.0. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 2m 5s 
{color} | {color:red} root in master failed with JDK v1.8.0. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in master failed with JDK v1.7.0_80. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 1m 48s 
{color} | {color:red} root in master failed with JDK v1.7.0_80. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 2m 
43s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 16s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in master failed with JDK v1.8.0. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 19s 
{color} | {color:red} root in master failed with JDK v1.8.0. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 58s 
{color} | {color:red} root in master failed with JDK v1.7.0_80. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 10s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvninstall {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s {color} 
| {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s {color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s {color} 
| {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s {color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK vVM. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvneclipse {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} mvneclipse {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 72 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 2s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 768 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} xml {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s {color} | 
{color:red} The patch has 2 ill-formed XML file(s). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m 
8s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.4.0 
2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-spark in the patch failed with JDK v#. {color} |
|