[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17229871#comment-17229871 ] Peter Somogyi commented on HBASE-20598: --- The JRuby upgrade broke the site build. I'm working on a fix and hopefully we can upgrade the asciidoctor plugin version. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Norbert Kalmár >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.4.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17229400#comment-17229400
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20598:
Results for branch branch-2
[build #99 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/99/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/99/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/99/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/99/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/99/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
>
>
> Key: HBASE-20598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dependencies, shell
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Norbert Kalmár
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch
>
>
> [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we
> can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17229189#comment-17229189
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20598:
Results for branch master
[build #122 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/122/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/122/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/122/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/122/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
>
>
> Key: HBASE-20598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dependencies, shell
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Norbert Kalmár
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch
>
>
> [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we
> can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17197067#comment-17197067 ] Norbert Kalmár commented on HBASE-20598: For changelog please check https://www.jruby.org/news Main points: JRuby 9.2.0 minor release: * Ruby 2.5 language and stdlib support * 225 issues fixed for 9.2.0.0 JRuby versions up to 9.2.13.0 had various bugfixes, seucirty fixes, performance improvements (memory reduction, runtime generations), IO improvements, basic support for java11, Main gems changes: - 9.2.11.0: Gems and gem paths packaged inside jar files will properly load now. This 9.2.10.0 regression was caused by a change in RubyGems 3 that exposed a bug in JRuby - 9.2.10.0: RubyGems has been updated to version 3.0.6. License did not change: "You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the 2-clause BSDL (see the file BSDL)" in 9.1.17.0 and in master. No commits was made to the license file either. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Norbert Kalmár >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17193483#comment-17193483 ] Tamas Penzes commented on HBASE-20598: -- https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/2308 > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17183912#comment-17183912 ] Norbert Kalmár commented on HBASE-20598: I'll create a pr against newest version (9.2.13) to see if tests run. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17165663#comment-17165663 ] Tamas Penzes commented on HBASE-20598: -- [~jackbearden] do you have a plan to finish this task? > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819450#comment-16819450 ] Sakthi commented on HBASE-20598: I think this can be taken forward now, [~jackbearden]. 9.2.x [x: 1-7] versions are available now. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16565799#comment-16565799 ] Jack Bearden commented on HBASE-20598: -- Ok, sounds good > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16565633#comment-16565633
]
Josh Elser commented on HBASE-20598:
{quote}Please wait until 9.2.1
{quote}
Yeah, doesn't seem urgent enough to push on this since they should fix things
upstream "soon" :)
> Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
>
>
> Key: HBASE-20598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dependencies, shell
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Jack Bearden
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch
>
>
> [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we
> can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564709#comment-16564709 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20598: --- If using https://github.com/torquebox/jruby-maven-plugins is straightforward enough, then maybe it's ok to do the other option. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564703#comment-16564703 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-20598: --- Please wait until 9.2.1 > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564692#comment-16564692 ] Jack Bearden commented on HBASE-20598: -- [~elserj] I have figured out what's going on. Two of our JRuby tests load rake: * tests_runner.rb * no_cluster_tests_runner.rb However, it appears the gemspec for rake was left out from the jruby-complete 9.2.0 jar by accident ([https://github.com/jruby/jruby/issues/5244)] and no rake installed by default. According to their milestone that was tagged to the issue, we can expect it to return in 9.2.1. Of course this doesn't stop us from just doing a "gem install rake" which would be sufficient enough to get this back to normal. I have reproduced and confirmed all of this locally. There are two options I see from this: # We can wait until 9.2.1 or continue to test against their nightly builds for 9.2.1 # Package rake into Maven as a dependency for the tests or install the gem in some other way prior to including in the test files (not sure I'm a fan for this as we would just have to remove it in a near future) What do you suggest? > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564542#comment-16564542
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20598:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
28s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} test4tests {color} | {color:orange}
0m 0s{color} | {color:orange} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or
modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also
please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 8m
39s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
2s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
21s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
43s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
5s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
9m 47s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.7.4
or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}267m 50s{color}
| {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}319m 30s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.client.TestQuotasShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestReplicationShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAdminShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestTableShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.rsgroup.TestShellRSGroups |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestShellNoCluster |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:b002b0b |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-20598 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12932815/HBASE-20598.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit shadedjars hadoopcheck
xml compile |
| uname | Linux 25f9cb677637 4.4.0-130-generic #156-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:53:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / a8e184dc77 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_171 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13869/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-root.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13869/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 5053 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: . U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13869/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
>
>
> Key: HBASE-20598
>
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564462#comment-16564462 ] Jack Bearden commented on HBASE-20598: -- Thank you sir > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564207#comment-16564207 ] Josh Elser commented on HBASE-20598: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13869/ > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16564165#comment-16564165 ] Jack Bearden commented on HBASE-20598: -- [~elserj], [~busbey] could we re-run this job on Jenkins? I haven't been able to find anything out of place yet. What is strange about this error is that hbase-shell wasn't even imported in the test > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16558715#comment-16558715 ] Jack Bearden commented on HBASE-20598: -- Just a quick update on this. I have been investigating the errors in the test class: TestHBaseFsckCleanReplicationBarriers. These tests pass on my mac and my docker image. I will try some full test runs over the next few days to see if I can reproduce > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Assignee: Jack Bearden >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch, HBASE-20598.002.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16554912#comment-16554912
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20598:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} test4tests {color} | {color:orange}
0m 0s{color} | {color:orange} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or
modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also
please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 5m
42s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
27s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 5m
21s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
16s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 5m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 5m
15s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
12m 15s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.7.4 or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}169m 56s{color}
| {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}228m 46s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:b002b0b |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-20598 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12932815/HBASE-20598.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit shadedjars hadoopcheck
xml compile |
| uname | Linux 00625b887703 3.13.0-143-generic #192-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 27
10:45:36 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / 3a3855aade |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_171 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13768/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-root.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13768/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 5113 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: . U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13768/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
>
>
> Key: HBASE-20598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dependencies, shell
>Reporter: Josh Elser
>Assignee: Jack Bearden
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments:
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16553208#comment-16553208 ] Jack Bearden commented on HBASE-20598: -- Thanks [~elserj] [~busbey]. Sure thing, I'll dive into this today > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16552982#comment-16552982 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20598: - yeah happy for the help. FWIW, there never was any follow-up on the jdk8 issue for [JRuby#4899|https://github.com/jruby/jruby/issues/4899] so probably it needs a new issue. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16552970#comment-16552970 ] Josh Elser commented on HBASE-20598: [~jackbearden], no worries at all! Happy to have you take this up if you have the time. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-20598.001.patch > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16551587#comment-16551587
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-20598:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 5m
23s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
23s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
35s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
48s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 4m
58s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
11m 6s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.7.4 or 3.0.0. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 3m
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}184m 45s{color}
| {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}237m 20s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestReplicationShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestShellNoCluster |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.rsgroup.TestShellRSGroups |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAdminShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestTableShell |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestQuotasShell |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:b002b0b |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-20598 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12932536/HBASE-20598.001.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit shadedjars hadoopcheck
xml compile |
| uname | Linux d423571ad84a 3.13.0-143-generic #192-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 27
10:45:36 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build@2/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / 2eee7a3f8b |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.5.4
(1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-17T18:33:14Z) |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_171 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13710/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-root.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13710/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 4866 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: . U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13710/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
>
>
>
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20598) Upgrade to JRuby 9.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16479666#comment-16479666 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20598: - whoever takes this on: please doc supported ruby version changes, any changes to bundled gems, any license adjustments, and if/how the jruby community denotes "early access" vs "production ready" releases. > Upgrade to JRuby 9.2 > > > Key: HBASE-20598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20598 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dependencies, shell >Reporter: Josh Elser >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > > [~mdrob] pointed out that there's a JRuby 9.2 release. We should see if we > can get ourselves onto that from our current 9.1 release line. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
