[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20855) PeerConfigTracker only supporting one listener will cause problem when there is a recovered replication queue

2018-07-20 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16550658#comment-16550658
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-20855:


Results for branch branch-1
[build #386 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/386/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/386//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/386//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/386//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> PeerConfigTracker only supporting one listener will cause problem when there 
> is a recovered replication queue
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20855
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
>Reporter: Jingyun Tian
>Assignee: Jingyun Tian
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.6
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20855.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.002.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.003.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.004.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.005.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.006.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.007.patch
>
>
> {code}
> public void init(Context context) throws IOException {
>  this.ctx = context;
>  if (this.ctx != null){
>  ReplicationPeer peer = this.ctx.getReplicationPeer();
>  if (peer != null){
>  peer.trackPeerConfigChanges(this);
>  } else {
>  LOG.warn("Not tracking replication peer config changes for Peer Id " + 
> this.ctx.getPeerId() +
>  " because there's no such peer");
>  }
>  }
> }
> {code}
> As we know, replication source will set itself to the PeerConfigTracker in 
> ReplicationPeer. When there is one or more recovered queue, each queue will 
> generate a new replication source, But they share the same ReplicationPeer. 
> Then when it calls setListener, the new generated one will cover the older 
> one. Thus there will only has one ReplicationPeer that receive the peer 
> config change notify.
> {code}
> public synchronized void setListener(ReplicationPeerConfigListener listener){
>  this.listener = listener;
> }
> {code}
>  
> To solve this,  PeerConfigTracker need to support multiple listener and 
> listener should be removed when the replication endpoint terminated.
> I will upload a patch later with fix and UT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20855) PeerConfigTracker only supporting one listener will cause problem when there is a recovered replication queue

2018-07-19 Thread Jingyun Tian (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16550115#comment-16550115
 ] 

Jingyun Tian commented on HBASE-20855:
--

[~yuzhih...@gmail.com] Sure. I'll update a patch asap.

> PeerConfigTracker only supporting one listener will cause problem when there 
> is a recovered replication queue
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20855
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 1.5.0
>Reporter: Jingyun Tian
>Assignee: Jingyun Tian
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.6
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20855.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.002.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.003.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.004.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.005.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.006.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.007.patch
>
>
> {code}
> public void init(Context context) throws IOException {
>  this.ctx = context;
>  if (this.ctx != null){
>  ReplicationPeer peer = this.ctx.getReplicationPeer();
>  if (peer != null){
>  peer.trackPeerConfigChanges(this);
>  } else {
>  LOG.warn("Not tracking replication peer config changes for Peer Id " + 
> this.ctx.getPeerId() +
>  " because there's no such peer");
>  }
>  }
> }
> {code}
> As we know, replication source will set itself to the PeerConfigTracker in 
> ReplicationPeer. When there is one or more recovered queue, each queue will 
> generate a new replication source, But they share the same ReplicationPeer. 
> Then when it calls setListener, the new generated one will cover the older 
> one. Thus there will only has one ReplicationPeer that receive the peer 
> config change notify.
> {code}
> public synchronized void setListener(ReplicationPeerConfigListener listener){
>  this.listener = listener;
> }
> {code}
>  
> To solve this,  PeerConfigTracker need to support multiple listener and 
> listener should be removed when the replication endpoint terminated.
> I will upload a patch later with fix and UT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20855) PeerConfigTracker only supporting one listener will cause problem when there is a recovered replication queue

2018-07-19 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16549812#comment-16549812
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-20855:


Results for branch branch-1.4
[build #390 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/390/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/390//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/390//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1.4/390//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> PeerConfigTracker only supporting one listener will cause problem when there 
> is a recovered replication queue
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20855
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 1.5.0
>Reporter: Jingyun Tian
>Assignee: Jingyun Tian
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.6
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20855.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.002.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.003.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.004.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.005.patch, 
> HBASE-20855.branch-1.006.patch, HBASE-20855.branch-1.007.patch
>
>
> {code}
> public void init(Context context) throws IOException {
>  this.ctx = context;
>  if (this.ctx != null){
>  ReplicationPeer peer = this.ctx.getReplicationPeer();
>  if (peer != null){
>  peer.trackPeerConfigChanges(this);
>  } else {
>  LOG.warn("Not tracking replication peer config changes for Peer Id " + 
> this.ctx.getPeerId() +
>  " because there's no such peer");
>  }
>  }
> }
> {code}
> As we know, replication source will set itself to the PeerConfigTracker in 
> ReplicationPeer. When there is one or more recovered queue, each queue will 
> generate a new replication source, But they share the same ReplicationPeer. 
> Then when it calls setListener, the new generated one will cover the older 
> one. Thus there will only has one ReplicationPeer that receive the peer 
> config change notify.
> {code}
> public synchronized void setListener(ReplicationPeerConfigListener listener){
>  this.listener = listener;
> }
> {code}
>  
> To solve this,  PeerConfigTracker need to support multiple listener and 
> listener should be removed when the replication endpoint terminated.
> I will upload a patch later with fix and UT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)