[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-30 Thread Sakthi (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17027205#comment-17027205
 ] 

Sakthi commented on HBASE-23748:


I thought I had resolved this one. The commit went in. Let me close this one. 
Thanks all

> Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-23748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sakthi
>Assignee: Sakthi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-23748.branch-2.2.001.patch
>
>
> HBASE-21284 was ought to be present in 2.2. But by the time the commit was 
> done, the branch had been cut already. Hence this Jira to track it's 
> inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-30 Thread Mingliang Liu (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17027203#comment-17027203
 ] 

Mingliang Liu commented on HBASE-23748:
---

Yes, I see the patch is good. Shall we resolve this JIRA? 

> Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-23748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sakthi
>Assignee: Sakthi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-23748.branch-2.2.001.patch
>
>
> HBASE-21284 was ought to be present in 2.2. But by the time the commit was 
> done, the branch had been cut already. Hence this Jira to track it's 
> inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-30 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17027136#comment-17027136
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-23748:


Results for branch branch-2.2
[build #770 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/770/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*

details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/770//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/770//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/770//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-23748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sakthi
>Assignee: Sakthi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-23748.branch-2.2.001.patch
>
>
> HBASE-21284 was ought to be present in 2.2. But by the time the commit was 
> done, the branch had been cut already. Hence this Jira to track it's 
> inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-29 Thread Sakthi (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17026151#comment-17026151
 ] 

Sakthi commented on HBASE-23748:


Thanks [~elserj]. Let me get this in.

> Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-23748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sakthi
>Assignee: Sakthi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-23748.branch-2.2.001.patch
>
>
> HBASE-21284 was ought to be present in 2.2. But by the time the commit was 
> done, the branch had been cut already. Hence this Jira to track it's 
> inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-29 Thread Josh Elser (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17025841#comment-17025841
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-23748:


Big +1

> Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-23748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sakthi
>Assignee: Sakthi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-23748.branch-2.2.001.patch
>
>
> HBASE-21284 was ought to be present in 2.2. But by the time the commit was 
> done, the branch had been cut already. Hence this Jira to track it's 
> inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-28 Thread Sakthi (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17025457#comment-17025457
 ] 

Sakthi commented on HBASE-23748:


[~apurtell] / [~liuml07] / [~elserj] can I get any of your +1s here, please?

> Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-23748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Sakthi
>Assignee: Sakthi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-23748.branch-2.2.001.patch
>
>
> HBASE-21284 was ought to be present in 2.2. But by the time the commit was 
> done, the branch had been cut already. Hence this Jira to track it's 
> inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23748) Include HBASE-21284 to branch-2.2

2020-01-28 Thread HBase QA (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17024958#comment-17024958
 ] 

HBase QA commented on HBASE-23748:
--

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  2m  
5s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} test4tests {color} | {color:orange}  
0m  0s{color} | {color:orange} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or 
modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also 
please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  5m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
53s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.2 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} refguide {color} | {color:blue} 16m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} branch has no errors when building the reference 
guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect. {color} 
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 4s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
29s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.2 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 11m 
45s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering 
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 15m 
28s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  4m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  2m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} refguide {color} | {color:blue}  5m 
12s{color} | {color:blue} patch has no errors when building the reference 
guide. See footer for rendered docs, which you should manually inspect. {color} 
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green}  4m 
 7s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded 
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
15m 19s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.8.5 2.9.2 or 3.1.2. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 17m 
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}234m 
32s{color} | {color:green} root in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  1m 
35s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate