[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-12-18 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13852262#comment-13852262
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-9987:
--

+1 on this change as is.

+1 on your suggestions above (remove force delete and how to return location... 
and to removing all code under lock today)

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-12-17 Thread Nicolas Liochon (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13850314#comment-13850314
 ] 

Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-9987:


bq. we just miss cache a few times more for a better perf overall?
It's difficult to be sure. But let say that if someone just removed the entry 
from the cache, it makes sense to to recheck again (and to add the entry again 
to be cache)... I feel that the shorter the synchronisation time the better it 
is, but there is nothing proven.

bq. There seems to be a bit of dodgy updating now we no longer have sync 
blocks. 
I think there are two things we should do:
 - removing the force delete: it's just bad imho: because someone does not want 
to use the cache, it removes the entry for everybody! As well, we're doing it 
inside the retry loop. That's strange.
 - when we use meta, instead of doing: ?? loc = call meta; cache(loc); return 
getCache()?? we should do ?? loc = call meta; cache(loc); return loc??. That's 
what we're doing outside of the lock actually. It's the prefect implementation 
that leads us to the logic. I'm waiting for the reverseScan before removing the 
prefect (this way we will do a single call instead of two as today). But may be 
I should remove the prefect immediately, keeping the two calls. The simplest 
implementation would just be removing all the code that is today in the lock.



> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-12-16 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13849939#comment-13849939
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-9987:
--

Is this ok?

+  Map tableLocations = 
getTableLocations(tableName);
+  // start to examine the cache. we can only do cache actions
+  // if there's something in the cache for this table.
+  rl = getCachedLocation(tableName, row);
+  if (rl != null) {
+tableLocations.remove(rl.getRegionInfo().getStartKey());
   }

Could another thread have set into tableLocations a good location and we are 
removing it here?  Previous it couldn't have happened because there was the 
sync block around the whole operation.

Ditto here:

+  result = this.cachedRegionLocations.get(tableName);
+  // if tableLocations for this table isn't built yet, make one
+  if (result == null) {
+result = new ConcurrentSkipListMap(Bytes.BYTES_COMPARATOR);
+ConcurrentSkipListMap old =
+this.cachedRegionLocations.putIfAbsent(tableName, result);
+if (old != null) {
+  return old;

Could another thread have inserted a result with perhaps some values in it?

I suppose it is not the end of the world if this happens We'll just miss 
the cache  a bit more often.

Could this be a problem?

-  synchronized(this.cachedRegionLocations) {
-this.cachedRegionLocations.clear();
-this.cachedServers.clear();
-  }
+  this.cachedRegionLocations.clear();
+  this.cachedServers.clear();


Could we give a bad location out if cachedRegionLocations is cleared but 
cachedServers is not?

There seems to be a bit of dodgy updating now we no longer have sync blocks. 
but perhaps it is ok; we just miss cache a few times more for a better perf 
overall?

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-12-16 Thread stack (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13849936#comment-13849936
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-9987:
--

+1

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-19 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13826320#comment-13826320
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-9987:
---

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #4687 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4687/])
HBASE-9987 Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager (nkeywal: 
rev 1543051)
* 
/hbase/trunk/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HConnectionManager.java


> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13826267#comment-13826267
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-9987:
---

SUCCESS: Integrated in hbase-0.96 #195 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.96/195/])
HBASE-9987 Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager (nkeywal: 
rev 1543050)
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HConnectionManager.java


> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13825600#comment-13825600
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-9987:
---

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #842 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/842/])
HBASE-9987 Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager (nkeywal: 
rev 1543051)
* 
/hbase/trunk/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HConnectionManager.java


> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13825546#comment-13825546
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-9987:
---

SUCCESS: Integrated in hbase-0.96-hadoop2 #123 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.96-hadoop2/123/])
HBASE-9987 Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager (nkeywal: 
rev 1543050)
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HConnectionManager.java


> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13825354#comment-13825354
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9987:
--

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12614364/9987.v2.patch
  against trunk revision .

{color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

{color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

{color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
10 warning messages.

{color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

{color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

{color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to 
fail.

{color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7913//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-18 Thread Nicolas Liochon (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13825238#comment-13825238
 ] 

Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-9987:


In v2 I've put back the cachedServer. We could do better than this, but short 
term it's safer to keep it. That's the only difference, so I will commit if the 
unit tests pass.

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch, 9987.v2.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-17 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824967#comment-13824967
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-9987:
--

+1

Will add the ConcurrentMap stuff to 0.94 as well.

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-17 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824886#comment-13824886
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-9987:
---

+1

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9987) Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager

2013-11-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824860#comment-13824860
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9987:
--

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12614282/9987.v1.patch
  against trunk revision .

{color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

{color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

{color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
10 warning messages.

{color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

{color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

{color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to 
fail.

{color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7903//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Remove some synchronisation points in HConnectionManager
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-9987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9987
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Client
>Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9987.v1.patch
>
>
> Change a Map to a concurrentMap
> Removed the "cachedServer (introduced in HBASE-4785). I suspect that this 
> function is not needed anymore as we also have a list of dead servers, and 
> accessing the list is not blocking. I will dig into this more however.
> The patch gives a 10% improvement with the NoClusterClient.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)