[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2018-12-11 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-17072:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.3.3

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.2.0, 2.0.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
>Assignee: Eiichi Sato
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.4.0, 0.98.24, 1.3.3, 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17072-0.98.patch, HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-12-05 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-17072:
---
Attachment: HBASE-17072-0.98.patch

When backporting this to 0.98 I found a multithreaded unit test in 
TestHFileBlock would fail due to concurrent read/update to the cached header 
ByteBuffer's position. In that test there is more than one read in progress 
with the same next offset. This is what I've done differently:

{code}
  PrefetchedHeader ph = prefetchedHeader.getAndSet(null); // be multithread 
safe
  ByteBuffer headerBuf = null;
  if (ph != null) {
if (ph.offset == offset) {
  headerBuf = ph.buf;   // our previous read, use the cached buffer
} else {
  prefetchedHeader.set(ph); // not our previous read, put back
}
  }
{code}

Only the first thread through will get the buffer if the offset matches. If the 
offset does not match or if another thread claimed the buffer a concurrently 
executing thread will just get {{null}}. 

The master patch does only:

{code}
  PrefetchedHeader ph = this.prefetchedHeader.get();
  return ph != null && ph.offset == offset? ph.buf: null;
{code}

More than one thread can get a reference to the buffer if the offset test 
succeeds. Could be fine for master, just pointing this out. Might be relevant 
for other backports. 1.1? 

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
>Assignee: Eiichi Sato
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.24
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17072-0.98.patch, HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> 

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-12-05 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-17072:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.98.24

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
>Assignee: Eiichi Sato
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.24
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17072-0.98.patch, HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-11-28 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Assignee: Eiichi Sato  (was: stack)
Priority: Critical  (was: Major)

Marking this critical because a long-standing issue that folks have identified 
a few times as problematic and have even tried to fix a couple of times in the 
past.

Also assigned [~sato_eiichi] the issue because of the amount of work done 
finding root cause.

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
>Assignee: Eiichi Sato
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-11-28 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
   Resolution: Fixed
 Assignee: stack
 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
   2.0.0
   Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

Pushed to removal of thread local to master and branch-1.

Let me know if you want this one applied [~mantonov] and [~busbey] (might be 
late for 1.2 but it is a cleanup of a long-standing trash-making and perf 
issue).

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
>Assignee: stack
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-11-28 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-11-25 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.master.005.patch

Seems to pass locally. Retry.

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, disable-block-header-cache.patch, 
> mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, 
> slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal usage

2016-11-23 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Summary: CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge 
ThreadLocal usage  (was: CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using 
G1GC)

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC; purge ThreadLocal 
> usage
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-23 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.master.005.patch

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, HBASE-17072.master.005.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-23 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.master.004.patch

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, disable-block-header-cache.patch, 
> mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, 
> slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-23 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.master.003.patch

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, HBASE-17072.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.004.patch, disable-block-header-cache.patch, 
> mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, 
> slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-22 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.master.002.patch

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17072.master.002.patch, disable-block-header-cache.patch, 
> mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, 
> slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-21 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
   Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.0.0, 2.0.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-21 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-17072:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: HBASE-17072.master.001.patch, 
> disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, mat-threads.png, 
> metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17072) CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC

2016-11-10 Thread Eiichi Sato (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eiichi Sato updated HBASE-17072:

Attachment: mat-threadlocals.png
metrics.png
disable-block-header-cache.patch
mat-threads.png
slave1.svg
slave2.svg
slave3.svg
slave4.svg

> CPU usage starts to climb up to 90-100% when using G1GC
> ---
>
> Key: HBASE-17072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17072
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Performance, regionserver
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.2.0
>Reporter: Eiichi Sato
> Attachments: disable-block-header-cache.patch, mat-threadlocals.png, 
> mat-threads.png, metrics.png, slave1.svg, slave2.svg, slave3.svg, slave4.svg
>
>
> h5. Problem
> CPU usage of a region server in our CDH 5.4.5 cluster, at some point, starts 
> to gradually get higher up to nearly 90-100% when using G1GC.  We've also run 
> into this problem on CDH 5.7.3 and CDH 5.8.2.
> In our production cluster, it normally takes a few weeks for this to happen 
> after restarting a RS.  We reproduced this on our test cluster and attached 
> the results.  Please note that, to make it easy to reproduce, we did some 
> "anti-tuning" on a table when running tests.
> In metrics.png, soon after we started running some workloads against a test 
> cluster (CDH 5.8.2) at about 7 p.m. CPU usage of the two RSs started to rise. 
>  Flame Graphs (slave1.svg to slave4.svg) are generated from jstack dumps of 
> each RS process around 10:30 a.m. the next day.
> After investigating heapdumps from another occurrence on a test cluster 
> running CDH 5.7.3, we found that the ThreadLocalMap contain a lot of 
> contiguous entries of {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} probably due to primary 
> clustering.  This caused more loops in 
> {{ThreadLocalMap#expungeStaleEntries()}}, consuming a certain amount of CPU 
> time.  What is worse is that the method is called from RPC metrics code, 
> which means even a small amount of per-RPC time soon adds up to a huge amount 
> of CPU time.
> This is very similar to the issue in HBASE-16616, but we have many 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} not only {{Counter$IndexHolder}} instances.  
> Here are some OQL counts from Eclipse Memory Analyzer (MAT).  This shows a 
> number of ThreadLocal instances in the ThreadLocalMap of a single handler 
> thread.
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = 
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader"
> #=> 10980 instances
> {code}
> {code}
> SELECT *
> FROM OBJECTS (SELECT AS RETAINED SET OBJECTS value
> FROM OBJECTS 0x4ee380430) obj
> WHERE obj.@clazz.@name = "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Counter$IndexHolder"
> #=> 2052 instances
> {code}
> Although as described in HBASE-16616 this somewhat seems to be an issue in 
> G1GC side regarding weakly-reachable objects, we should keep ThreadLocal 
> usage minimal and avoid creating an indefinite number (in this case, a number 
> of HFiles) of ThreadLocal instances.
> HBASE-16146 removes ThreadLocals from the RPC metrics code.  That may solve 
> the issue (I just saw the patch, never tested it at all), but the 
> {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} are still there in the ThreadLocalMap, which 
> may cause issues in the future again.
> h5. Our Solution
> We simply removed the whole {{HFileBlock$PrefetchedHeader}} caching and 
> fortunately we didn't notice any performance degradation for our production 
> workloads.
> Because the PrefetchedHeader caching uses ThreadLocal and because RPCs are 
> handled randomly in any of the handlers, small Get or small Scan RPCs do not 
> benefit from the caching (See HBASE-10676 and HBASE-11402 for the details).  
> Probably, we need to see how well reads are saved by the caching for large 
> Scan or Get RPCs and especially for compactions if we really remove the 
> caching. It's probably better if we can remove ThreadLocals without breaking 
> the current caching behavior.
> FWIW, I'm attaching the patch we applied. It's for CDH 5.4.5.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)