[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5270: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.2 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, HBASE-5270v11.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v10.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, hbase-5270v9.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: HBASE-5270-92v11.patch patchv11 for 0.92 Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.2 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, HBASE-5270-92v11.patch, HBASE-5270v11.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v10.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, hbase-5270v9.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: HBASE-5270v11.patch minor items addressed in patchv11 https://reviews.apache.org/r/4021/ Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.2 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, HBASE-5270v11.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v10.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, hbase-5270v9.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zhihong Yu updated HBASE-5270: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.2 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v10.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, hbase-5270v9.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v10.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.2 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v10.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, hbase-5270v9.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v9.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, hbase-5270v9.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v7.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v8.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, hbase-5270v7.patch, hbase-5270v8.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v5.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v6.patch I‘m sorry for the mistake of ConcurrentHashSet. Thank Ted. Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, hbase-5270v5.patch, hbase-5270v6.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: hbase-5270v4.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zhihong Yu updated HBASE-5270: -- Comment: was deleted (was: @Chunhui: Since review board isn't used, do you mind highlighting the new changes in hbase-5270v4.patch ? Thanks) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Assignee: chunhui shen Fix For: 0.92.1, 0.94.0 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, hbase-5270v4.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: 5270-90v3.patch Takes Stack‘s comment in 5270-90v3.patch Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-90v3.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: 5270-testcasev2.patch hbase-5270v2.patch Optimize the testcase as Stack's sample. And hbase-5270v2 is a patch to fix the issue for trunk including testcase. Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: 5270-90v2.patch 5270-90-testcasev2.patch Testcase and patch for 90 version Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90-testcasev2.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-90v2.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, 5270-testcasev2.patch, hbase-5270.patch, hbase-5270v2.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chunhui shen updated HBASE-5270: Attachment: 5270-90-testcase.patch 5270-90.patch 5270-testcase.patch hbase-5270.patch I have written a testcase for this issue to show the exist problem in 5270-testcase.patch And hbase-5270.patch is the combination of testcase and HBASE-5179 ‘s latest patch。 5270-90.patch and 5270-90-testcase.patch are for 90 version Now， testcase may not contain all the situations which causes problems and runs slowly. I will optimize the testcase later. Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, hbase-5270.patch This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zhihong Yu updated HBASE-5270: -- Attachment: mapreduce-3583-trunk-v2.txt Reattaching patch v2 for TRUNK with --no-prefix Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, hbase-5270.patch This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5270) Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5270: - Attachment: sampletest.txt Handle potential data loss due to concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownHandler - Key: HBASE-5270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Components: master Reporter: Zhihong Yu Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1 Attachments: 5270-90-testcase.patch, 5270-90.patch, 5270-testcase.patch, hbase-5270.patch, sampletest.txt This JIRA continues the effort from HBASE-5179. Starting with Stack's comments about patches for 0.92 and TRUNK: Reviewing 0.92v17 isDeadServerInProgress is a new public method in ServerManager but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Does isDeadRootServerInProgress need to be public? Ditto for meta version. This method param names are not right 'definitiveRootServer'; what is meant by definitive? Do they need this qualifier? Is there anything in place to stop us expiring a server twice if its carrying root and meta? What is difference between asking assignment manager isCarryingRoot and this variable that is passed in? Should be doc'd at least. Ditto for meta. I think I've asked for this a few times - onlineServers needs to be explained... either in javadoc or in comment. This is the param passed into joinCluster. How does it arise? I think I know but am unsure. God love the poor noob that comes awandering this code trying to make sense of it all. It looks like we get the list by trawling zk for regionserver znodes that have not checked in. Don't we do this operation earlier in master setup? Are we doing it again here? Though distributed split log is configured, we will do in master single process splitting under some conditions with this patch. Its not explained in code why we would do this. Why do we think master log splitting 'high priority' when it could very well be slower. Should we only go this route if distributed splitting is not going on. Do we know if concurrent distributed log splitting and master splitting works? Why would we have dead servers in progress here in master startup? Because a servershutdownhandler fired? This patch is different to the patch for 0.90. Should go into trunk first with tests, then 0.92. Should it be in this issue? This issue is really hard to follow now. Maybe this issue is for 0.90.x and new issue for more work on this trunk patch? This patch needs to have the v18 differences applied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
