[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6930) [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly

2013-06-27 Thread Liyin Tang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Liyin Tang updated HBASE-6930:
--

Attachment: (was: D5841.2.patch)

 [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly
 

 Key: HBASE-6930
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Liyin Tang
 Attachments: HBASE-6930.diff


 When processing the multiPut, multiMutations or multiDelete operations, each 
 IPC handler thread tries to acquire a lock for each row key in these batches. 
 If there are duplicated row keys in these batches, previously the IPC handler 
 thread will repeatedly acquire the same row key again and again.
 So the optimization is to sort each batch operation based on the row key in 
 the client side, and skip acquiring the same row lock repeatedly in the 
 server side.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6930) [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly

2013-06-27 Thread Liyin Tang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Liyin Tang updated HBASE-6930:
--

Attachment: HBASE-6930.diff

 [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly
 

 Key: HBASE-6930
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Liyin Tang
 Attachments: HBASE-6930.diff


 When processing the multiPut, multiMutations or multiDelete operations, each 
 IPC handler thread tries to acquire a lock for each row key in these batches. 
 If there are duplicated row keys in these batches, previously the IPC handler 
 thread will repeatedly acquire the same row key again and again.
 So the optimization is to sort each batch operation based on the row key in 
 the client side, and skip acquiring the same row lock repeatedly in the 
 server side.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6930) [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly

2013-06-27 Thread Liyin Tang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Liyin Tang updated HBASE-6930:
--

Attachment: (was: D5841.1.patch)

 [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly
 

 Key: HBASE-6930
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Liyin Tang
 Attachments: HBASE-6930.diff


 When processing the multiPut, multiMutations or multiDelete operations, each 
 IPC handler thread tries to acquire a lock for each row key in these batches. 
 If there are duplicated row keys in these batches, previously the IPC handler 
 thread will repeatedly acquire the same row key again and again.
 So the optimization is to sort each batch operation based on the row key in 
 the client side, and skip acquiring the same row lock repeatedly in the 
 server side.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6930) [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly

2012-10-03 Thread Phabricator (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Phabricator updated HBASE-6930:
---

Attachment: D5841.1.patch

mbautin requested code review of [jira] [HBASE-6930] [89-fb] Fix 
TestThriftServerLegacy: notifyAll should be inside synchronized block.
Reviewers: Kannan, Liyin, Karthik, JIRA

  There were a couple of reasons why TestThriftServerLegacy has been failing 
recently in the HBase 89-fb branch:
  - rHBASEEIGHTNINEFBBRANCH1393468 was calling notifyAll outside a synchronized 
block
  - rHBASEEIGHTNINEFBBRANCH1391219 changed the meaning of a null expected value 
passed to checkAndMutate but that was not reflected in the Thrift handler

TEST PLAN
  Run TestThriftServerLegacy

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.facebook.net/D5841

AFFECTED FILES
  src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java

MANAGE HERALD DIFFERENTIAL RULES
  https://reviews.facebook.net/herald/view/differential/

WHY DID I GET THIS EMAIL?
  https://reviews.facebook.net/herald/transcript/13833/

To: Kannan, Liyin, Karthik, JIRA, mbautin


 [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly
 

 Key: HBASE-6930
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Liyin Tang
 Attachments: D5841.1.patch, D5841.2.patch


 When processing the multiPut, multiMutations or multiDelete operations, each 
 IPC handler thread tries to acquire a lock for each row key in these batches. 
 If there are duplicated row keys in these batches, previously the IPC handler 
 thread will repeatedly acquire the same row key again and again.
 So the optimization is to sort each batch operation based on the row key in 
 the client side, and skip acquiring the same row lock repeatedly in the 
 server side.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6930) [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly

2012-10-03 Thread Phabricator (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Phabricator updated HBASE-6930:
---

Attachment: D5841.2.patch

mbautin updated the revision [jira] [HBASE-6930] [89-fb] Fix 
TestThriftServerLegacy: notifyAll should be inside synchronized block, and a 
null checkAndMutate expected value should be handled correctly.
Reviewers: Kannan, Liyin, Karthik, JIRA

  Adding ThriftServerRunner fixes

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.facebook.net/D5841

AFFECTED FILES
  src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java
  src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/thrift/ThriftServerRunner.java
  src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/thrift/TestThriftServerLegacy.java

To: Kannan, Liyin, Karthik, JIRA, mbautin


 [89-fb] Avoid acquiring the same row lock repeatedly
 

 Key: HBASE-6930
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6930
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Liyin Tang
 Attachments: D5841.1.patch, D5841.2.patch


 When processing the multiPut, multiMutations or multiDelete operations, each 
 IPC handler thread tries to acquire a lock for each row key in these batches. 
 If there are duplicated row keys in these batches, previously the IPC handler 
 thread will repeatedly acquire the same row key again and again.
 So the optimization is to sort each batch operation based on the row key in 
 the client side, and skip acquiring the same row lock repeatedly in the 
 server side.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira