[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-12679) Allow users to be able to specify an implementation of IMetaStoreClient via HiveConf

2021-01-04 Thread Jose (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17258137#comment-17258137
 ] 

Jose commented on HIVE-12679:
-

Any update reviewing the patch ?

> Allow users to be able to specify an implementation of IMetaStoreClient via 
> HiveConf
> 
>
> Key: HIVE-12679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12679
> Project: Hive
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Configuration, Metastore, Query Planning
>Reporter: Austin Lee
>Assignee: Noritaka Sekiyama
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: metastore, pull-request-available
> Attachments: HIVE-12679.1.patch, HIVE-12679.2.patch, 
> HIVE-12679.branch-1.2.patch, HIVE-12679.branch-2.3.patch, HIVE-12679.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 1.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hi,
> I would like to propose a change that would make it possible for users to 
> choose an implementation of IMetaStoreClient via HiveConf, i.e. 
> hive-site.xml.  Currently, in Hive the choice is hard coded to be 
> SessionHiveMetaStoreClient in org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Hive.  There 
> is no other direct reference to SessionHiveMetaStoreClient other than the 
> hard coded class name in Hive.java and the QL component operates only on the 
> IMetaStoreClient interface so the change would be minimal and it would be 
> quite similar to how an implementation of RawStore is specified and loaded in 
> hive-metastore.  One use case this change would serve would be one where a 
> user wishes to use an implementation of this interface without the dependency 
> on the Thrift server.
>   
> Thank you,
> Austin



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-22224) Support Parquet-Avro Timestamp Type

2020-08-26 Thread Felix Kizhakkel Jose (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185208#comment-17185208
 ] 

Felix Kizhakkel Jose commented on HIVE-4:
-

[~bdscheller] [~chenxiang] Any update on this? What is the solution?

> Support Parquet-Avro Timestamp Type
> ---
>
> Key: HIVE-4
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4
> Project: Hive
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Database/Schema
>Affects Versions: 2.3.5, 2.3.6
>Reporter: cdmikechen
>Assignee: cdmikechen
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: parquet, pull-request-available
>  Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When user create an external table and import a parquet-avro data with 1.8.2 
> version which supported logical_type in Hive2.3 or before version, Hive can 
> not read timestamp type column data correctly.
> Hive will read it as LongWritable which it actually stores as 
> long(logical_type=timestamp-millis).So we may add some codes in 
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.objectinspector.primitive.WritableTimestampObjectInspector.java
>  to let Hive cast long type to timestamp type.
> Some code like below:
>  
> public Timestamp getPrimitiveJavaObject(Object o) {
>   if (o instanceof LongWritable) {
>     return new Timestamp(((LongWritable) o).get());
>   }
>   return o == null ? null : ((TimestampWritable) o).getTimestamp();
> }
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)