[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eugene Koifman reassigned HIVE-13741:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Eugene Koifman
> TxnHandler.enqueueLockWithRetry() - optimize sql
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-13741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13741
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Metastore, Transactions
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Eugene Koifman
> Assignee: Eugene Koifman
> Original Estimate: 3h
> Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> TxnHandler.enqueueLockWithRetry() does SQL insert into 2 tables using
> (possibly) multiple statements for each. Could easily generate 1 statement
> for each table.
> TxnHandler.addDynamicPartitions() - the insert stmt here should combing
> multiple rows into single SQL stmt (but with a limit for extreme cases)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13395?focusedCommentId=15271712&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15271712
> bq. In TxnHandler.commitTxn, would it make sense to rearrange this so that
> the check is made whether there are any operations that could conflict before
> the mutex is obtained and the transaction id checked? If there's nothing to
> record in the write sets I don't see why you need to hold the mutex or even
> record a commit txn id.
> Note that Oracle doesn't support "insert into T values(1,2), (3,4)"
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
