[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-10521) TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions

2015-05-06 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531481#comment-14531481
 ] 

Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-10521:
-

Given that precommit tests have now run, [~ekoifman]/[~alangates], could you 
please verify and commit this patch?

 TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions
 --

 Key: HIVE-10521
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521
 Project: Hive
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Transactions
Affects Versions: 0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
Reporter: Alan Gates
Assignee: Alan Gates
 Attachments: HIVE-10521.2.patch, HIVE-10521.3.patch, 
 HIVE-10521.4.patch, HIVE-10521.patch


 {code}
   for (int i = 0; i  20  rs.next(); i++) deadTxns.add(rs.getLong(1));
   // We don't care whether all of the transactions get deleted or not,
   // if some didn't it most likely means someone else deleted them in the 
 interum
   if (deadTxns.size()  0) abortTxns(dbConn, deadTxns);
 {code}
 While it makes sense to limit the number of transactions aborted in one pass 
 (since this get's translated to an IN clause) we should still make sure all 
 are timed out.  Also, 20 seems pretty small as a batch size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-10521) TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions

2015-05-05 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528353#comment-14528353
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-10521:




{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 no tests executed

Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12729817/HIVE-10521.3.patch

Test results: 
http://ec2-174-129-184-35.compute-1.amazonaws.com/jenkins/job/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build/3732/testReport
Console output: 
http://ec2-174-129-184-35.compute-1.amazonaws.com/jenkins/job/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build/3732/console
Test logs: 
http://ec2-174-129-184-35.compute-1.amazonaws.com/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build-3732/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Tests exited with: NonZeroExitCodeException
Command 'bash /data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/source-prep.sh' failed with exit 
status 1 and output '+ [[ -n /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera ]]
+ export JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera
+ JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera
+ export 
PATH=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera/bin/:/usr/local/apache-maven-3.0.5/bin:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera/bin:/usr/local/apache-ant-1.9.1/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/hiveptest/bin
+ 
PATH=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera/bin/:/usr/local/apache-maven-3.0.5/bin:/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_45-cloudera/bin:/usr/local/apache-ant-1.9.1/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/hiveptest/bin
+ export 'ANT_OPTS=-Xmx1g -XX:MaxPermSize=256m '
+ ANT_OPTS='-Xmx1g -XX:MaxPermSize=256m '
+ export 'M2_OPTS=-Xmx1g -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Dhttp.proxyHost=localhost 
-Dhttp.proxyPort=3128'
+ M2_OPTS='-Xmx1g -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Dhttp.proxyHost=localhost 
-Dhttp.proxyPort=3128'
+ cd /data/hive-ptest/working/
+ tee /data/hive-ptest/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build-3732/source-prep.txt
+ [[ false == \t\r\u\e ]]
+ mkdir -p maven ivy
+ [[ git = \s\v\n ]]
+ [[ git = \g\i\t ]]
+ [[ -z master ]]
+ [[ -d apache-github-source-source ]]
+ [[ ! -d apache-github-source-source/.git ]]
+ [[ ! -d apache-github-source-source ]]
+ cd apache-github-source-source
+ git fetch origin
+ git reset --hard HEAD
HEAD is now at 3f72f81 HIVE-5545 : HCatRecord getInteger method returns String 
when used on Partition columns of type INT (Sushanth Sowmyan, reviewed by Jason 
Dere)
+ git clean -f -d
+ git checkout master
Already on 'master'
+ git reset --hard origin/master
HEAD is now at 3f72f81 HIVE-5545 : HCatRecord getInteger method returns String 
when used on Partition columns of type INT (Sushanth Sowmyan, reviewed by Jason 
Dere)
+ git merge --ff-only origin/master
Already up-to-date.
+ git gc
+ patchCommandPath=/data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/smart-apply-patch.sh
+ patchFilePath=/data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/build.patch
+ [[ -f /data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/build.patch ]]
+ chmod +x /data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/smart-apply-patch.sh
+ /data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/smart-apply-patch.sh 
/data/hive-ptest/working/scratch/build.patch
The patch does not appear to apply with p0, p1, or p2
+ exit 1
'
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12729817 - PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build

 TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions
 --

 Key: HIVE-10521
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521
 Project: Hive
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Transactions
Affects Versions: 0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
Reporter: Alan Gates
Assignee: Alan Gates
 Attachments: HIVE-10521.2.patch, HIVE-10521.3.patch, HIVE-10521.patch


 {code}
   for (int i = 0; i  20  rs.next(); i++) deadTxns.add(rs.getLong(1));
   // We don't care whether all of the transactions get deleted or not,
   // if some didn't it most likely means someone else deleted them in the 
 interum
   if (deadTxns.size()  0) abortTxns(dbConn, deadTxns);
 {code}
 While it makes sense to limit the number of transactions aborted in one pass 
 (since this get's translated to an IN clause) we should still make sure all 
 are timed out.  Also, 20 seems pretty small as a batch size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-10521) TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions

2015-05-02 Thread Eugene Koifman (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525331#comment-14525331
 ] 

Eugene Koifman commented on HIVE-10521:
---

+1

 TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions
 --

 Key: HIVE-10521
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521
 Project: Hive
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Transactions
Affects Versions: 0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
Reporter: Alan Gates
Assignee: Alan Gates
 Attachments: HIVE-10521.2.patch, HIVE-10521.3.patch, HIVE-10521.patch


 {code}
   for (int i = 0; i  20  rs.next(); i++) deadTxns.add(rs.getLong(1));
   // We don't care whether all of the transactions get deleted or not,
   // if some didn't it most likely means someone else deleted them in the 
 interum
   if (deadTxns.size()  0) abortTxns(dbConn, deadTxns);
 {code}
 While it makes sense to limit the number of transactions aborted in one pass 
 (since this get's translated to an IN clause) we should still make sure all 
 are timed out.  Also, 20 seems pretty small as a batch size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-10521) TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions

2015-05-01 Thread Eugene Koifman (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14524355#comment-14524355
 ] 

Eugene Koifman commented on HIVE-10521:
---

[~alangates], if commit is only called once in timeOutTxns(), why break up the 
delete into multiple statement?
The patch works functionally as is, but but wouldn't it be better to read the 
whole list of txn ids into memory and then commit each abort bach separately?  
It would probably make deadlocks less likely if transactions are shorter.

 TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions
 --

 Key: HIVE-10521
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521
 Project: Hive
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Transactions
Affects Versions: 0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
Reporter: Alan Gates
Assignee: Alan Gates
 Attachments: HIVE-10521.2.patch, HIVE-10521.3.patch, HIVE-10521.patch


 {code}
   for (int i = 0; i  20  rs.next(); i++) deadTxns.add(rs.getLong(1));
   // We don't care whether all of the transactions get deleted or not,
   // if some didn't it most likely means someone else deleted them in the 
 interum
   if (deadTxns.size()  0) abortTxns(dbConn, deadTxns);
 {code}
 While it makes sense to limit the number of transactions aborted in one pass 
 (since this get's translated to an IN clause) we should still make sure all 
 are timed out.  Also, 20 seems pretty small as a batch size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-10521) TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions

2015-04-29 Thread Eugene Koifman (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519873#comment-14519873
 ] 

Eugene Koifman commented on HIVE-10521:
---

All connections in TxnHandler are autoCommit=false
timeOutTxns() opens a cursor and calls abortTxns() for each batch.
abortTxns() calls commit().  So if the cursor has more than 
TIMED_OUT_TXN_ABORT_BATCH_SIZE rows, it will end up calling commit while the 
cursor is open... I don't think you can do that (and continue to read it after 
that)

TestTxnHandler has unused import import junit.framework.Assert;


 TxnHandler.timeOutTxns only times out some of the expired transactions
 --

 Key: HIVE-10521
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10521
 Project: Hive
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Transactions
Affects Versions: 0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
Reporter: Alan Gates
Assignee: Alan Gates
 Attachments: HIVE-10521.patch


 {code}
   for (int i = 0; i  20  rs.next(); i++) deadTxns.add(rs.getLong(1));
   // We don't care whether all of the transactions get deleted or not,
   // if some didn't it most likely means someone else deleted them in the 
 interum
   if (deadTxns.size()  0) abortTxns(dbConn, deadTxns);
 {code}
 While it makes sense to limit the number of transactions aborted in one pass 
 (since this get's translated to an IN clause) we should still make sure all 
 are timed out.  Also, 20 seems pretty small as a batch size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)