Re: [I] [Feature Request]: workflows are missing a ExecutionStoppedListener (hop)

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub 


hansva closed issue #3715: [Feature Request]: workflows are missing a 
ExecutionStoppedListener
URL: https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/3715


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: workflows are missing a ExecutionStoppedListener (hop)

2024-04-09 Thread via GitHub 


nadment commented on issue #3715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/3715#issuecomment-2045953456

   I've seen bug #3675 but haven't seen it in action yet. I'll keep an eye out 
for it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: workflows are missing a ExecutionStoppedListener (hop)

2024-04-09 Thread via GitHub 


hansva commented on issue #3715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/3715#issuecomment-2045946828

   I don't think we have to wait for a 3.0 version for this. You might have 
also noticed with your work that the pipeline finished listener is triggered 
too soon, not all transforms have finished when it is triggered 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: workflows are missing a ExecutionStoppedListener (hop)

2024-04-09 Thread via GitHub 


nadment commented on issue #3715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/3715#issuecomment-2045942349

   I'd also be tempted to standardize methods between IPipelineEngine and 
IWorkflowEngine.
   
![image](https://github.com/apache/hop/assets/39568358/38f31bdb-c46f-4aa8-8252-f922d04d26f5)
   
   Or a variant but even more API break: 
   [add][remove]PipelineExecutionStartedListener
   [fire]PipelineExecutionStartedListener
   [add][remove]WorkflowExecutionStartedListener
   [fire]WorkflowExecutionStartedListener


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: workflows are missing a ExecutionStoppedListener (hop)

2024-03-13 Thread via GitHub 


hansva commented on issue #3715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/3715#issuecomment-1994573656

   .take-issue


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org