[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9409) yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check

2019-06-13 Thread Roman Shtykh (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863622#comment-16863622
 ] 

Roman Shtykh commented on IGNITE-9409:
--

[~ilyak] Thanks for your work!

> yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-9409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: yarn
>Reporter: Roman Shtykh
>Assignee: Ilya Kasnacheev
>Priority: Major
>  Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11919) Change message format for incompatible fields' types changes

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Magda (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Denis Magda updated IGNITE-11919:
-
Description: 
Follow this discussion thread to find out the reason for the change:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-stops-working-suddenly-during-dev-td42207.html

It's suggested to apply the following format:
{code}
ERROR: Type 'ClassName/TypeName' has a different/incorrect type
for field 'FieldName'. Expected 'type1' but 'type2' was provided. Field
type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
if the type change is required.
{code}

That's an example of how it will look like:
{code}
ERROR: Type 'Person' has a different/incorrect type
for field 'salary'. Expected 'double' but 'string' was provided. Field
type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
if the type change is required.
{code}

  was:
Follow this discussion thread to find out the reason for the change:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-stops-working-suddenly-during-dev-td42207.html

It's suggested to apply the following format:
_ERROR: Type 'ClassName/TypeName' has a different/incorrect type
for field 'FieldName'. Expected 'type1' but 'type2' was provided. Field
type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
if the type change is required._

That's an example of how it will look like:
_ERROR: Type 'Person' has a different/incorrect type
for field 'salary'. Expected 'double' but 'string' was provided. Field
type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
if the type change is required._


> Change message format for incompatible fields' types changes
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-11919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11919
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Follow this discussion thread to find out the reason for the change:
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-stops-working-suddenly-during-dev-td42207.html
> It's suggested to apply the following format:
> {code}
> ERROR: Type 'ClassName/TypeName' has a different/incorrect type
> for field 'FieldName'. Expected 'type1' but 'type2' was provided. Field
> type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
> if the type change is required.
> {code}
> That's an example of how it will look like:
> {code}
> ERROR: Type 'Person' has a different/incorrect type
> for field 'salary'. Expected 'double' but 'string' was provided. Field
> type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
> if the type change is required.
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11919) Change message format for incompatible fields' types changes

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Magda (JIRA)
Denis Magda created IGNITE-11919:


 Summary: Change message format for incompatible fields' types 
changes
 Key: IGNITE-11919
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11919
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Denis Magda
 Fix For: 2.8


Follow this discussion thread to find out the reason for the change:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-stops-working-suddenly-during-dev-td42207.html

It's suggested to apply the following format:
_ERROR: Type 'ClassName/TypeName' has a different/incorrect type
for field 'FieldName'. Expected 'type1' but 'type2' was provided. Field
type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
if the type change is required._

That's an example of how it will look like:
_ERROR: Type 'Person' has a different/incorrect type
for field 'salary'. Expected 'double' but 'string' was provided. Field
type's modification is unsupported, clean {root_path}/marshaller directory
if the type change is required._



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11918) extend test coverage for KILL QUERY

2019-06-13 Thread Pavel Kuznetsov (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863481#comment-16863481
 ] 

Pavel Kuznetsov commented on IGNITE-11918:
--

tests run https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=4113648

> extend test coverage for KILL QUERY
> ---
>
> Key: IGNITE-11918
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11918
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Pavel Kuznetsov
>Assignee: Pavel Kuznetsov
>Priority: Major
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently we have implemented KILL QUERY COMMAND. However not all cases 
> covered by tests and probably it doesn't work properly for all cases.
> On first look need to add following test scenarios for KILL QUERY command:
> 1) not stable topology - when node couldn't reserve partitions.
> 2) map and reduce parts
> 3) with concrete partition
> 4) when partition pruning is work.
> 5) local query
> 6) distributed joins.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11848) [IEP-35] Monitoring Phase 1

2019-06-13 Thread Vyacheslav Daradur (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863454#comment-16863454
 ] 

Vyacheslav Daradur commented on IGNITE-11848:
-

[~NIzhikov] Looks good to me. Please run tests once again before the merge, 
just to be sure.

> [IEP-35] Monitoring Phase 1
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-11848
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Task
>Affects Versions: 2.7
>Reporter: Nikolay Izhikov
>Assignee: Nikolay Izhikov
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: IEP-35
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>  Time Spent: 6h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Umbrella ticket for the IEP-35. Monitoring and profiling.
> Phase 1 should include:
>  * NextGen monitoring subsystem implementation to manage
>  ** metrics
>  ** -lists- (will be implemented in the following tickets)
>  ** exporters
>  * JMX, SQLView, Log exporters
>  * Migration of existing metrics to new manager
>  * -Lists for all Ignite user API-



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11918) extend test coverage for KILL QUERY

2019-06-13 Thread Pavel Kuznetsov (JIRA)
Pavel Kuznetsov created IGNITE-11918:


 Summary: extend test coverage for KILL QUERY
 Key: IGNITE-11918
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11918
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Test
Reporter: Pavel Kuznetsov
Assignee: Pavel Kuznetsov


Currently we have implemented KILL QUERY COMMAND. However not all cases covered 
by tests and probably it doesn't work properly for all cases.
On first look need to add following test scenarios for KILL QUERY command:
1) not stable topology - when node couldn't reserve partitions.
2) map and reduce parts
3) with concrete partition
4) when partition pruning is work.
5) local query
6) distributed joins.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11916) reorder fields for GridQueryKillResponse and GridQueryKillRequest

2019-06-13 Thread Pavel Kuznetsov (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863384#comment-16863384
 ] 

Pavel Kuznetsov commented on IGNITE-11916:
--

Test run : https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=4112673

> reorder fields for GridQueryKillResponse and GridQueryKillRequest
> -
>
> Key: IGNITE-11916
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11916
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Pavel Kuznetsov
>Assignee: Pavel Kuznetsov
>Priority: Major
>
> need to reorder all fields for GridQueryKillResponse and GridQueryKillRequest 
> messages using MessageCodeGenerator to have right order of fields to avoid 
> upgrade issues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11917) Row count [select count(*) from table] not matching with the actual row count present in the table

2019-06-13 Thread shivakumar (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

shivakumar updated IGNITE-11917:

Description: 
To reproduce, create a sample table using JDBC endpoint:

CREATE TABLE person(Id VARCHAR, birthTime TIMESTAMP, name VARCHAR, PRIMARY 
KEY(Id)) WITH "TEMPLATE=templateEternal,CACHE_NAME=person, 
KEY_TYPE=personKey,VALUE_TYPE=person";

 

and configure cache expiry policy as below 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

with above cache configuration records will start expiring at the end of 10 
minute, batch insert around 1 records to the table and after 10 minute 
records will start expiring but after some time check the records count [select 
count(*) from person] most of the time it will show some non zero number but if 
rows are selected instead of count to see the actual data with [select * from 
person]  there will be zero rows.

why count is not becoming zero even though there are now data (rows) in the 
table ?

 

 

0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800> select count(*) from person;
 ++
|COUNT(*)|

++
|70|

++
 1 row selected (0.004 seconds)
 0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800> select * from person;
 
+-+---++++-
|ID|BIRTHTIME|NAME|

+-+---++++-
 
+-+---++++-
 No rows selected (0.015 seconds)
 0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800>

  was:
To reproduce, create a sample table using JDBC endpoint:

CREATE TABLE person(Id VARCHAR, birthTime TIMESTAMP, name VARCHAR, PRIMARY 
KEY(Id)) WITH "TEMPLATE=templateEternal,CACHE_NAME=person, 
KEY_TYPE=personKey,VALUE_TYPE=person";

 

and configure cache expiry policy as below 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

with above cache configuration records will start expiring at the end of 10 
minute, batch insert around 1 records to the table and after 10 minute 
records start expiring  but after some time check the records count [select 
count(*) from person] it should show some non zero number but if rows are 
selected instead of count to see the actual data with [select * from person] 
[select * from person] there will be zero rows.

why count is not becoming zero?

 

 


0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800> select count(*) from person;
++
| COUNT(*) |
++
| 70 |
++
1 row selected (0.004 seconds)
0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800> select * from person;
+++++-+
| ID | BIRTHTIME | NAME |
+++++-+
+++++-+
No rows selected (0.015 seconds)
0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800>


> Row count [select count(*) from table] not matching with the actual row count 
> present in the table 
> ---
>
> Key: IGNITE-11917
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11917
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: sql
>Affects Versions: 2.7
>Reporter: shivakumar
>Priority: Major
>
> To reproduce, create a sample table using JDBC endpoint:
> CREATE TABLE person(Id VARCHAR, birthTime TIMESTAMP, name VARCHAR, PRIMARY 
> KEY(Id)) WITH "TEMPLATE=templateEternal,CACHE_NAME=person, 
> KEY_TYPE=personKey,VALUE_TYPE=person";
>  
> and configure cache expiry policy as below 
> 
>  
>   class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>   factory-method="factoryOf">
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> with above cache configuration records will start expiring at the end of 10 
> minute, batch insert around 1 records to the table and after 10 minute 
> records will start expiring but after some time check the records count 
> [select count(*) from person] most of the time it will show some non zero 
> number but if rows are selected instead of count to see the actual data with 
> [select * from person]  

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11917) Row count [select count(*) from table] not matching with the actual row count present in the table

2019-06-13 Thread shivakumar (JIRA)
shivakumar created IGNITE-11917:
---

 Summary: Row count [select count(*) from table] not matching with 
the actual row count present in the table 
 Key: IGNITE-11917
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11917
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: sql
Affects Versions: 2.7
Reporter: shivakumar


To reproduce, create a sample table using JDBC endpoint:

CREATE TABLE person(Id VARCHAR, birthTime TIMESTAMP, name VARCHAR, PRIMARY 
KEY(Id)) WITH "TEMPLATE=templateEternal,CACHE_NAME=person, 
KEY_TYPE=personKey,VALUE_TYPE=person";

 

and configure cache expiry policy as below 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

with above cache configuration records will start expiring at the end of 10 
minute, batch insert around 1 records to the table and after 10 minute 
records start expiring  but after some time check the records count [select 
count(*) from person] it should show some non zero number but if rows are 
selected instead of count to see the actual data with [select * from person] 
[select * from person] there will be zero rows.

why count is not becoming zero?

 

 


0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800> select count(*) from person;
++
| COUNT(*) |
++
| 70 |
++
1 row selected (0.004 seconds)
0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800> select * from person;
+++++-+
| ID | BIRTHTIME | NAME |
+++++-+
+++++-+
No rows selected (0.015 seconds)
0: jdbc:ignite:thin://10.*.*.*:10800>



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11771) Kubernetes discovery support for non-ready pods

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Magda (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863308#comment-16863308
 ] 

Denis Magda commented on IGNITE-11771:
--

[~shroman], sorry my bad. Sure, please disregard that suggestion.

> Kubernetes discovery support for non-ready pods
> ---
>
> Key: IGNITE-11771
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11771
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 2.7
>Reporter: Balazs Peterfi
>Assignee: Denis Magda
>Priority: Minor
>  Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have a use case where Ignite is running in embedded mode and on start-up 
> there is a time consuming task to warm-up the cache. During that time 
> Kubernetes sees the pods as not ready due to the loading, thus the current 
> implementation doesn't return them as potential members. Eventually they 
> would become ready and see each-other but by then it would be a split-brain 
> situation.
> The idea is to return IPs not only for "ready" pods but for "not ready" ones 
> as well in case the discovery client is configured that way. See more details 
> here: 
> [https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.13/#endpointsubset-v1-core]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11916) reorder fields for GridQueryKillResponse and GridQueryKillRequest

2019-06-13 Thread Pavel Kuznetsov (JIRA)
Pavel Kuznetsov created IGNITE-11916:


 Summary: reorder fields for GridQueryKillResponse and 
GridQueryKillRequest
 Key: IGNITE-11916
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11916
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Pavel Kuznetsov
Assignee: Pavel Kuznetsov


need to reorder all fields for GridQueryKillResponse and GridQueryKillRequest 
messages using MessageCodeGenerator to have right order of fields to avoid 
upgrade issues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11910) JDBC v2: adds 'schema' to URL parameters, makes 'cache' parameter is optional for the most cases

2019-06-13 Thread Taras Ledkov (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Taras Ledkov updated IGNITE-11910:
--
Summary: JDBC v2: adds 'schema' to URL parameters, makes 'cache' parameter 
is optional for the most cases  (was: JDBC v2: adds 'schema' to URL parameters, 
makes 'cache' parameter is optional fpr the most cases)

> JDBC v2: adds 'schema' to URL parameters, makes 'cache' parameter is optional 
> for the most cases
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-11910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11910
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jdbc
>Reporter: Taras Ledkov
>Assignee: Taras Ledkov
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> We have to do changes for the JDBC v2:
> - makes 'cache' parameter is optional.
> - add 'schema' parameter to URL.
> When cache and schema parameters are not defined 'PUBLIC' schema is used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9409) yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check

2019-06-13 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ilya Kasnacheev updated IGNITE-9409:

Component/s: yarn

> yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-9409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: yarn
>Reporter: Roman Shtykh
>Assignee: Ilya Kasnacheev
>Priority: Major
>  Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11915) Document all ways to download Ignite in YARN

2019-06-13 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev (JIRA)
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-11915:


 Summary: Document all ways to download Ignite in YARN
 Key: IGNITE-11915
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11915
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: documentation
Reporter: Ilya Kasnacheev
 Fix For: 2.8


That is, automatic mirror download, download by URL, local file, HDFS path, 
HDFS releases dir.

For other properties it would be nice to mention whether they accept local or 
HDFS paths because it's not obvious.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9409) yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check

2019-06-13 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ilya Kasnacheev updated IGNITE-9409:

Ignite Flags:   (was: Docs Required)

> yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-9409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Roman Shtykh
>Assignee: Ilya Kasnacheev
>Priority: Major
>  Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9409) yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check

2019-06-13 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863174#comment-16863174
 ] 

Ilya Kasnacheev commented on IGNITE-9409:
-

I did a full range of tests on EMR, was able to start a cluster. Going to 
merge. [~shroman] thanks for review.

> yarn IgniteProvider uses an obsolete URL for a version check
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-9409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9409
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Roman Shtykh
>Assignee: Ilya Kasnacheev
>Priority: Major
>  Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-3653) P2P doesn't work for remote filter and filter factory.

2019-06-13 Thread Ignite TC Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863141#comment-16863141
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-3653:
---

{panel:title=-- Run :: All: Possible 
Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}Platform .NET (Core Linux){color} [[tests 3 TIMEOUT 
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4108742]]

{color:#d04437}Platform .NET{color} [[tests 3 TIMEOUT 
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4108744]]
* exe: 
CacheQueriesRestartServerTest.Test_ScanQueryAfterClientReconnect_ReturnsResults(False)

{panel}
[TeamCity *-- Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4102688buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> P2P doesn't work for remote filter and filter factory.
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-3653
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3653
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: cache
>Affects Versions: 1.6
>Reporter: Nikolai Tikhonov
>Assignee: Denis Mekhanikov
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Attachments: CCP2PTest.patch
>
>
> Remote filter and filter factory classes were not deployed on nodes which 
> join to cluster after their initialization. Test attached.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IGNITE-11876) control.sh idle verify --cache-filter doesn't work without --dump option

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Chudov (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Denis Chudov reassigned IGNITE-11876:
-

Assignee: Denis Chudov

> control.sh idle verify --cache-filter doesn't work without --dump option
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-11876
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11876
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Sergey Antonov
>Assignee: Denis Chudov
>Priority: Major
>
> At this moment control.sh {{--cache idle_verify --cache-filter PERSISTENT}} 
> doesn't work (see {{VerifyBackupPartitionsTaskV2#isCacheMatchFilter()}}). We 
> should fix it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10913) Reduce heap occupation by o.a.i.i.processors.cache.persistence.file.FilePageStore instances.

2019-06-13 Thread Ignite TC Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863018#comment-16863018
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-10913:


{panel:title=-- Run :: All: Possible 
Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}Platform .NET (Core Linux){color} [[tests 2 TIMEOUT 
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4086454]]

{color:#d04437}Platform .NET{color} [[tests 0 TIMEOUT 
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4086453]]

{panel}
[TeamCity *-- Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4086482buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> Reduce heap occupation by 
> o.a.i.i.processors.cache.persistence.file.FilePageStore instances.
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-10913
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10913
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Alexei Scherbakov
>Assignee: Denis Chudov
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>  Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> With large topology and large amount of caches/partitions and enabled 
> persistence could be millions of FilePageStore objects in heap (for each 
> partition).
> Each instance has a reference to a File (field cfgFile) storing as String 
> absolute path to a partition.
> Also internal File inplementation (on example UnixFile) also allocates space 
> for file path.
> I observed about 2Gb of heap space occupied by these objects in one of 
> environments.
> Solution: dereference (set to null) cfgFile after object creation, create 
> File object lazily on demand when needed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11911) GridToStringBuilder allocates redundant memory

2019-06-13 Thread Ryabov Dmitrii (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862987#comment-16862987
 ] 

Ryabov Dmitrii commented on IGNITE-11911:
-

Looks good.

> GridToStringBuilder allocates redundant memory
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-11911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11911
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.7
>Reporter: Aleksey Plekhanov
>Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov
>Priority: Major
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A lot of classes in Ignite uses {{GridToStringBuilder}} to implement their 
> {{toString()}} method. {{GridToStringBuilder}} uses thread local buffer to 
> generate string representation. This buffer extended on demand but never 
> shrank. On the final step {{GridToStringBuilder}} uses java {{StringBuilder}} 
> class to produce output string and uses own buffer size as {{StringBuilder}} 
> initial capacity. This leads to unnecessary memory allocation since we only 
> need to allocate memory for meaningful data, but not for all buffer.
>  Reproducer:
>  
> {code:java}
> public void testSB() {
> GridToStringBuilder.toString(C1.class, new C1(1_000_000));
> GridToStringBuilder.toString(C1.class, new C1(100));
> }
> public class C1 {
> private String f;
> C1(int len) {
> f = new String(new char[len]);
> }
> }
> {code}
> Here on the second line about 1 million chars StringBuilder will be 
> allocated, but only about 100 chars needed.
>  
> Problem code (SBLimitedLength.java:293):
>  
> {code:java}
> StringBuilder res = new StringBuilder(impl().capacity() + tailLen + 100);
> {code}
> Here {{length()}} method can be used instead of {{capacity()}}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11848) [IEP-35] Monitoring Phase 1

2019-06-13 Thread Andrey Gura (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862974#comment-16862974
 ] 

Andrey Gura commented on IGNITE-11848:
--

[~NIzhikov] Thanks! LGTM. If you are ready, please, proceed with merge.

> [IEP-35] Monitoring Phase 1
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-11848
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Task
>Affects Versions: 2.7
>Reporter: Nikolay Izhikov
>Assignee: Nikolay Izhikov
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: IEP-35
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>  Time Spent: 6h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Umbrella ticket for the IEP-35. Monitoring and profiling.
> Phase 1 should include:
>  * NextGen monitoring subsystem implementation to manage
>  ** metrics
>  ** -lists- (will be implemented in the following tickets)
>  ** exporters
>  * JMX, SQLView, Log exporters
>  * Migration of existing metrics to new manager
>  * -Lists for all Ignite user API-



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-11913) Incorrect formatting of idle_verify output

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Chudov (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Denis Chudov updated IGNITE-11913:
--
Ignite Flags:   (was: Docs Required)

> Incorrect formatting of idle_verify output
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-11913
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11913
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Denis Chudov
>Assignee: Denis Chudov
>Priority: Major
>
> Command:
> {noformat}
> bin/control.sh --cache idle_verify cachepoc1.* --cache-filter PERSISTENT 
> --host 172.25.1.29
> {noformat}
> Output:
> {noformat}
> Control utility [ver. 2.5.8#20190511-sha1:8b27f3a6]
> 2019 Copyright(C) Apache Software Foundation
> User: isuntsov
> Time: 2019-05-14T15:22:20.565
> 
> idle_verify failed.There are no caches matching given filter options.Idle 
> verify failed on nodes:
> Node ID: e5a981f6-9d0b-4cd7-aad3-fe3cc7fa6101 [172.25.1.29] consistent ID: 
> poc-tester-server-172.25.1.29-id-0
> See log for additional information. 
> /home/isuntsov/858_test/idle_verify-2019-05-14T15-22-20_895.txt
> {noformat}
> In general, the output is CORRECT but I think it will be more readable with 
> the following formatting:
> {noformat}
> idle_verify failed.
> There are no caches matching given filter options: [ cachepoc1.*; PERSISTENT].
> Idle verify failed on nodes:
> Node ID: e5a981f6-9d0b-4cd7-aad3-fe3cc7fa6101 [172.25.1.29]
> Consistent ID: poc-tester-server-172.25.1.29-id-0
> See log for additional information: 
> /home/isuntsov/858_test/idle_verify-2019-05-14T15-22-20_895.txt
> {noformat}
> Also, I guess that *null* in "Exception message" should be replaced with some 
> meaningful message:
>  \{noformat}
> cat /home/isuntsov/858_test/idle_verify-2019-05-14T15-22-20_895.txt
> idle_verify failed.There are no caches matching given filter options.Idle 
> verify failed on nodes:
> Node ID: e5a981f6-9d0b-4cd7-aad3-fe3cc7fa6101 [172.25.1.29] consistent ID: 
> poc-tester-server-172.25.1.29-id-0
> Exception message:
> null
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11914) Failures to deserialize discovery data should be handled by a failure handler

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Mekhanikov (JIRA)
Denis Mekhanikov created IGNITE-11914:
-

 Summary: Failures to deserialize discovery data should be handled 
by a failure handler
 Key: IGNITE-11914
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11914
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.7.5
Reporter: Denis Mekhanikov


When a node during join receives a discovery data packet, that it cannot 
deserialize, then this error is printed to log and not handled in any way. It 
leads to swallowing potentially important failures.

For example, a failure to deserialize a continuous query remote filter should 
be propagated to a failure handler, but it doesn't happen. Test is attached.

Error message:

{noformat}
Failed to unmarshal discovery data for component: 0
class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to find class with given 
class loader for unmarshalling (make sure same versions of all classes are 
available on all nodes or enable peer-class-loading) 
[clsLdr=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@18b4aac2, 
cls=org.apache.ignite.tests.p2p.CacheDeploymentEntryEventFilterFactory]
at 
org.apache.ignite.marshaller.jdk.JdkMarshaller.unmarshal0(JdkMarshaller.java:146)
at 
org.apache.ignite.marshaller.AbstractNodeNameAwareMarshaller.unmarshal(AbstractNodeNameAwareMarshaller.java:93)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.unmarshalZip(IgniteUtils.java:10068)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.internal.DiscoveryDataPacket.unmarshalData(DiscoveryDataPacket.java:292)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.internal.DiscoveryDataPacket.unmarshalGridData(DiscoveryDataPacket.java:154)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.TcpDiscoverySpi.onExchange(TcpDiscoverySpi.java:2065)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.processNodeAddFinishedMessage(ServerImpl.java:4882)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.processMessage(ServerImpl.java:2964)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.processMessage(ServerImpl.java:2696)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:7527)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$RingMessageWorker.body(ServerImpl.java:2818)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120)
at 
org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ServerImpl$MessageWorkerThread.body(ServerImpl.java:7458)
at org.apache.ignite.spi.IgniteSpiThread.run(IgniteSpiThread.java:61)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: 
org.apache.ignite.tests.p2p.CacheDeploymentEntryEventFilterFactory
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:348)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.forName(IgniteUtils.java:8672)
at 
org.apache.ignite.marshaller.jdk.JdkMarshallerObjectInputStream.resolveClass(JdkMarshallerObjectInputStream.java:59)
at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1863)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1746)
at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:2037)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1568)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:428)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.query.continuous.CacheContinuousQueryHandlerV2.readExternal(CacheContinuousQueryHandlerV2.java:179)
at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readExternalData(ObjectInputStream.java:2113)
at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:2062)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1568)
at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:2282)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:2206)
at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:2064)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1568)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:428)
at java.util.HashMap.readObject(HashMap.java:1409)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1158)
at 

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11913) Incorrect formatting of idle_verify output

2019-06-13 Thread Denis Chudov (JIRA)
Denis Chudov created IGNITE-11913:
-

 Summary: Incorrect formatting of idle_verify output
 Key: IGNITE-11913
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11913
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Denis Chudov
Assignee: Denis Chudov


Command:
{noformat}
bin/control.sh --cache idle_verify cachepoc1.* --cache-filter PERSISTENT --host 
172.25.1.29
{noformat}
Output:
{noformat}
Control utility [ver. 2.5.8#20190511-sha1:8b27f3a6]

2019 Copyright(C) Apache Software Foundation

User: isuntsov

Time: 2019-05-14T15:22:20.565



idle_verify failed.There are no caches matching given filter options.Idle 
verify failed on nodes:

Node ID: e5a981f6-9d0b-4cd7-aad3-fe3cc7fa6101 [172.25.1.29] consistent ID: 
poc-tester-server-172.25.1.29-id-0

See log for additional information. 
/home/isuntsov/858_test/idle_verify-2019-05-14T15-22-20_895.txt
{noformat}
In general, the output is CORRECT but I think it will be more readable with the 
following formatting:
{noformat}
idle_verify failed.

There are no caches matching given filter options: [ cachepoc1.*; PERSISTENT].

Idle verify failed on nodes:

Node ID: e5a981f6-9d0b-4cd7-aad3-fe3cc7fa6101 [172.25.1.29]

Consistent ID: poc-tester-server-172.25.1.29-id-0

See log for additional information: 
/home/isuntsov/858_test/idle_verify-2019-05-14T15-22-20_895.txt
{noformat}

Also, I guess that *null* in "Exception message" should be replaced with some 
meaningful message:
 \{noformat}
cat /home/isuntsov/858_test/idle_verify-2019-05-14T15-22-20_895.txt
idle_verify failed.There are no caches matching given filter options.Idle 
verify failed on nodes:
Node ID: e5a981f6-9d0b-4cd7-aad3-fe3cc7fa6101 [172.25.1.29] consistent ID: 
poc-tester-server-172.25.1.29-id-0
Exception message:
null
{noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11848) [IEP-35] Monitoring Phase 1

2019-06-13 Thread Nikolay Izhikov (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862851#comment-16862851
 ] 

Nikolay Izhikov commented on IGNITE-11848:
--

[~ascherbakov] Thanks for the review!

I answered all of your questions.

> [IEP-35] Monitoring Phase 1
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-11848
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Task
>Affects Versions: 2.7
>Reporter: Nikolay Izhikov
>Assignee: Nikolay Izhikov
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: IEP-35
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>  Time Spent: 5.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Umbrella ticket for the IEP-35. Monitoring and profiling.
> Phase 1 should include:
>  * NextGen monitoring subsystem implementation to manage
>  ** metrics
>  ** -lists- (will be implemented in the following tickets)
>  ** exporters
>  * JMX, SQLView, Log exporters
>  * Migration of existing metrics to new manager
>  * -Lists for all Ignite user API-



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11912) [IEP-35] Research possibility to optimize MetricRegistry

2019-06-13 Thread Nikolay Izhikov (JIRA)
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-11912:


 Summary: [IEP-35] Research possibility to optimize MetricRegistry
 Key: IGNITE-11912
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11912
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Nikolay Izhikov
Assignee: Nikolay Izhikov


We should research and benchmark different data structure for a MetricRegistry 
implementation.

A basic assumption of `MetricRegistry` usage:

1. Collection of metrics almost constant during Ignite lifetime. It will be 
changed on cache creation(destroy) and other not frequent operations.

2. Collection of metrics will be read very frequently(each several seconds or 
frequently) by configured metric exporters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-5037) Fix broken @AffinityKeyMapped annotation for compute jobs.

2019-06-13 Thread Evgenii Zhuravlev (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Evgenii Zhuravlev updated IGNITE-5037:
--
Labels:   (was: newbie)

> Fix broken @AffinityKeyMapped annotation for compute jobs.
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-5037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5037
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.7
>Reporter: Alexei Scherbakov
>Priority: Major
>
> See related discussion on dev list entitled Proper collocation of 
> computations and data 
> (http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Proper-collocation-of-computations-and-data-td16945.html).
> We must repair data affinity routing for compute jobs. It should work same as 
> for affinityCall/Run with partition.
> Currently, ComputeTask map method returns Map ClusterNode>,
> but we have to provide some API allows to map ComputeJobs to partitions or 
> keys. 
> This can be done using AffinityKeyMapped annotation or any other way.
> Since that's a publiс API any fixes should be discussed on dev list prior to 
> implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)