[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16265149#comment-16265149 ]
Pavel Tupitsyn edited comment on IGNITE-6989 at 11/24/17 1:34 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Proposed schema: * 0,1,... - general-purpose operations (we don't have any?) * 100, 101, ... - cache operations * 200, ... - quries * 300, ... - metadata operations was (Author: ptupitsyn): Proposed schema: * 0,1,2,... - general-purpose operations, OP_CACHE_GET, OP_CACHE_DESTROY, etc * 100, 101, ... - cache operations * 200, ... - quries * 300, ... - metadata operations > .NET: Thin client: Group operation codes by purpose > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6989 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: platforms, thin client > Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn > Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn > Labels: .NET > Fix For: 2.4 > > > Currently operation codes are in random order. Let's group things by purpose: > cache operations, metadata, queries, etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)