[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9786) MVCC: simplify TX wait list management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16688583#comment-16688583 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-9786: Github user devozerov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4908 > MVCC: simplify TX wait list management > -- > > Key: IGNITE-9786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc >Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov >Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov >Priority: Major > Attachments: IGNITE_9786__Patch_.patch > > > It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization > mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a > list of waiters. > Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9786) MVCC: simplify TX wait list management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16686486#comment-16686486 ] Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-9786: - Re-merged with master, re-run tests to get visa: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=2317118 > MVCC: simplify TX wait list management > -- > > Key: IGNITE-9786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc >Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov >Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization > mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a > list of waiters. > Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9786) MVCC: simplify TX wait list management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16663704#comment-16663704 ] Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-9786: - Re-run: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=2162968 > MVCC: simplify TX wait list management > -- > > Key: IGNITE-9786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc >Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov >Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization > mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a > list of waiters. > Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9786) MVCC: simplify TX wait list management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16637097#comment-16637097 ] Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-9786: - Test run: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=1998703=queuedBuildOverviewTab > MVCC: simplify TX wait list management > -- > > Key: IGNITE-9786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc >Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov >Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization > mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a > list of waiters. > Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9786) MVCC: simplify TX wait list management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16637093#comment-16637093 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-9786: GitHub user devozerov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4908 IGNITE-9786 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-9786 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4908.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #4908 commit 9200568fb830c93c7d98c74c14d4006bbdac8797 Author: devozerov Date: 2018-10-03T14:37:59Z WIP. commit 88ef985156c42ffeef564b7a1a2a54e5efaa7989 Author: devozerov Date: 2018-10-03T15:41:59Z Done. > MVCC: simplify TX wait list management > -- > > Key: IGNITE-9786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc >Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov >Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization > mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a > list of waiters. > Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
