[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-12561) SQL: Fix incorrect check for conflict of field names in key and value.

2020-07-08 Thread Evgeniy Rudenko (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Evgeniy Rudenko updated IGNITE-12561:
-
Release Note: Added validation of the uniqueness of field's name annotated 
with @QuerySqlEntity. Previously cache could be started without errors, but the 
key's field would not be queryable:

> SQL: Fix incorrect check for conflict of field names in key and value.
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-12561
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12561
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: sql
>Reporter: Evgeniy Rudenko
>Assignee: Evgeniy Rudenko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If key and value types of an SQL-enabled cache have the same fields annotated 
> with `@QuerySqlEntity` the cache will start without errors but the key's 
> field will not be queryable:
> {noformat}
> // here, you can't query Key.a via SQL
> class Key {
>@QuerySqlField int a; 
>@QuerySqlField int b; 
> }
> class Value { 
>@QuerySqlField int a;
>@QuerySqlField int c;
> }
> {noformat}
>  
> To workaround that, one needs to specify a different name for one of the `a` 
> fields: 
> {noformat}
> class Key {
>@QuerySqlField(name = "key_a") int a;
>@QuerySqlField int b; 
> }
> class Value {
>@QuerySqlField int a; 
>@QuerySqlField int c;
> }
> {noformat}
> The first configuration is obviously incorrect - one can't use the `Key.a` in 
> SQL but annotates it as queryable. We need to issue an error or at least a 
> warning for starting a configuration like this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-12561) SQL: Fix incorrect check for conflict of field names in key and value.

2020-02-03 Thread Andrey Mashenkov (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrey Mashenkov updated IGNITE-12561:
--
Summary: SQL: Fix incorrect check for conflict of field names in key and 
value.  (was: Add a check for conflict of field names in key and value)

> SQL: Fix incorrect check for conflict of field names in key and value.
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-12561
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12561
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: sql
>Reporter: Evgeniy Rudenko
>Assignee: Evgeniy Rudenko
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> If key and value types of an SQL-enabled cache have the same fields annotated 
> with `@QuerySqlEntity` the cache will start without errors but the key's 
> field will not be queryable:
> {noformat}
> // here, you can't query Key.a via SQL
> class Key {
>@QuerySqlField int a; 
>@QuerySqlField int b; 
> }
> class Value { 
>@QuerySqlField int a;
>@QuerySqlField int c;
> }
> {noformat}
>  
> To workaround that, one needs to specify a different name for one of the `a` 
> fields: 
> {noformat}
> class Key {
>@QuerySqlField(name = "key_a") int a;
>@QuerySqlField int b; 
> }
> class Value {
>@QuerySqlField int a; 
>@QuerySqlField int c;
> }
> {noformat}
> The first configuration is obviously incorrect - one can't use the `Key.a` in 
> SQL but annotates it as queryable. We need to issue an error or at least a 
> warning for starting a configuration like this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)